ramu
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,372
- Reaction score
- 0
Pakistan was formed with a strong foundation of Islam. A lot of people would agree with me that being a Muslim, being a Pakistani are two things. We have a large Muslim population outside Pakistan and therefore being a Muslim is different from being a Pakistani is my opinion but please feel free to express your thoughts.
One observation from many neutral observers is that, the working of many functions of the GoP is based on Islam or derived from the teachings. Please let me know if this is correct.
Many people argue that the strength of Pakistan is also its weakness. They also point out that democracy is a distant dream as long as the Army takes on itself the responsibility of being a guardian of the religion. Generals can interpret the teachings in a way that can uproot democratically elected Government and insert themselves at the helm of power. This gives a degree on instability for economic activity and dislodges investment. Further, no concrete framework for today's challenges can be derived if the basic tenets of governance is constrained by religion. Is this a fair comment or do you think otherwise?
I would like to know what my Pakistani friends think about religion and the concept of a nation. Is effective governance possible within the framework of religion? What holds importance to the people of Pakistan and what gives them their identity?
The question of a nation and religion seem to be mixed willingly on several platforms and is visible in the writing of several authors. Pakistan has mixed all aspects of life including cricket with religion as the previous coach(Bob) of Pakistan had expressed in one of his interviews.
Please respond to this thread with your thoughts with a degree of responsibility. I would request all to not turn this thread in to a flame thread.
One observation from many neutral observers is that, the working of many functions of the GoP is based on Islam or derived from the teachings. Please let me know if this is correct.
Many people argue that the strength of Pakistan is also its weakness. They also point out that democracy is a distant dream as long as the Army takes on itself the responsibility of being a guardian of the religion. Generals can interpret the teachings in a way that can uproot democratically elected Government and insert themselves at the helm of power. This gives a degree on instability for economic activity and dislodges investment. Further, no concrete framework for today's challenges can be derived if the basic tenets of governance is constrained by religion. Is this a fair comment or do you think otherwise?
I would like to know what my Pakistani friends think about religion and the concept of a nation. Is effective governance possible within the framework of religion? What holds importance to the people of Pakistan and what gives them their identity?
The question of a nation and religion seem to be mixed willingly on several platforms and is visible in the writing of several authors. Pakistan has mixed all aspects of life including cricket with religion as the previous coach(Bob) of Pakistan had expressed in one of his interviews.
Please respond to this thread with your thoughts with a degree of responsibility. I would request all to not turn this thread in to a flame thread.