What's new

REFUSAL OF KASHMIR PLEBISCITE IS COWARDICE OR FEAR OF REALITY

Hari Singh's grandson Ajatshatru challenges
(Ajatshatru member of the House of elders in the J&K assembly)

"Agar Yeh (Riyasat) Aap Se Nahin Sambhalti Hai, Toh Jis Ki Thi Usko Wapas Lauta Do
(If you cannot manage the affairs of this former princely state, return it to whom it belonged.)
18963658.cms.jpg
 
In 1948 India was went in UNSC India was begging to UNSC to intervene in the Kashmir Issue with Pakistan the UNSC pre condition was not accetable to Pakistan and Pakistan rejected the proposal on the grounds that the Kashmiris would be unable to vote freely in the presence of the occupational Indian army.

and according the UNSC Resolution 126(1957) 2.12.1957 one condition was as through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, &
in absence of Pakistan and under Indian Army control free and impartial plebiscite was imposable !!
What will be the result of plebiscite!! The Treasure in Burglar Security


Resolution 126 (1957)
Adopted by the Security Council at its 808th meeting on 2 December, 1957.


THE SECURITY COUNCIL,
Having received and noted with appreciation the report of Mr. Gunner V. Jarring, the
Representative of Sweden, on the mission undertaken by him pursuant to its resolution 123 (1957)
of 21 February, 1957,

Expressing its thanks to Mr. Jarring for the care and ability with which he has carried out his mission,

Observing with appreciation the expressions made by both parties of sincere willingness to
co-operate with the United Nations in finding a peaceful solution,

Observing further that the governments of India and Pakistan recognise and accept the provisions of
its resolution 38(1948) of 17 January, 1948 and of the resolutions of the United Nations
Commission for India and Pakistan dated 13 August, 1948 and 5 January, 1949, which envisage in
accordance with their terms the determination of the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmirin accordance with the will of the people through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, and that Mr. Jarring felt it appropriate to explore what was impeding their fullimplementation,

Concerned over the lack of progress towards a settlement of the dispute which his report manifests,
Considering the importance which it has attached to demilitarisation of the State of Jammu and
Kashmir as one of the steps towards settlement,


Recalling its previous resolutions and the resolutions of the United Nations Commission for India and
Pakistan on the India-Pakistan question,

1. Requests the United Nations Representative for India and Pakistan to make any
recommendations to the parties for further appropriate action, with a view to making progress
towards the implementation of the resolutions of the United Nations Commission for India and
Pakistan of 13 August, 1948 and 5 January, 1949, and towards a peaceful settlement;

3. Authorises the United Nations Representative to visit the sub-continent for these purposes;

4. Instructs the United Nations Representative to report to the Security Council on his efforts as
soon as possible.

The Security Council voted on this Resolution on 2-12-57 with the following result:
In favour: Australia, China, Colombia, Cuba, France, Iraq, Philippines, Sweden, U.K. and
U.S.A.
Against: None
Abstaining: U.S.S.R.
It doesn't matter what pakistan thought,the only thing that matters is the resolution and the UN-prescribed precondition of plebiscite. You failed to fulfill that even after signing the resolution.....so it did not happen. By the way,what made you think that we shall go by the way you want? We could accept only the formula prescribed by the UN.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom