Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This article is very half-@rsed ignoramus vitriol against Pakistan that got printed in the name of history.
pathetic.
Indians on this forum assume that they are immune to the disintegration $hit.
Based on what?
Indian army, what the heck else.
Indian Punjab tried to separate, guess what? INdian army had to go in. Rest of the state apparatus failed miserably.
Indian Kashmir tried to separate, guess what? INdian army had to go in. Rest of the state apparatus failed miserably.
So a balanced article would have said
Pakistan too, of course, would not like any of this. Top officials of responsible states — which Pakistan certainly is — prefer the status quo and quiescent borders, not their opposite. But Pakistan might at some point in the 21st century have no choice but to confront India's partial dissolution
This is in our genes too live free or die.
As long Pakistani and Indians governments maintain strong armies, the two countries will survive. Destruction of either army will result in the end of the other.
We may be separate, but we are joined at the hip in many ways.
India should only worry about resolving Kashmir issue with Pakistan, as it is between India and Pakistan, for everything else India is not a party, shouldn't be India's business or concern.
I respectfully disagree.
Pakistan is indeed trying to change the status quo by infiltrating terrorists each year, supporting Taliban in Afghanistan to achieve strategic depth.
This is not behavior of a responsible state.
And it would be foolish to compare stability of India with Pakistan.
IMHO, India would always exist in some form or other, can't say same about Pakistan.
in simple terms this is utter B.Sno different than what India has been doing since 1947.
Please do not be so biased as to ignore the basic facts.
I have had these thoughts myself but I could never articulate them so clearly together.
Much has been made of China's cycles of consolidation and fracture, but India too undergoes these cycles.
Currently Pakistan insulates India from all the violence and barbarism originating in Central Asia, which was the major source of strife in India in yesteryears.Pakistan is like a modern great wall of India in that sense.
A failure of Pakistan would be catastrophic for security of India.
You couldnt be more mistaken my friend a strong government is the basic requirement of a state. You do know there are alot of countries that do not have armies,how do you justify their survival? Plus the main purpose of an army is external defense instead of internal which is more of the polices jobA strong army is basic requirement of a nation state.
Kaplan's boss George Friedman in his book "The Next 100 Years" raises serious doubts about India's viability as a modern nation-state, and dismisses the talk of its emergence as one of the great powers of the 21st century. Friedman does not accept that any of the four BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will achieve great world power status in this century. Instead, he believes that Turkey, Poland and Japan will join the United States as the most important world powers in the next 50 years. Haq's Musings: Are India and Pakistan Failed States?
Given the many ethnic, regional, religious and caste fault lines running through the length and breadth of India, there have long been questions raised about India's identity as a nation. Speaking about it last April, the US South Asia expert Stephen Cohen of Brookings Institution said, " But there is no all-Indian Hindu identity—India is riven by caste and linguistic differences, and Aishwarya Rai and Sachin Tendulkar are more relevant rallying points for more Indians than any Hindu caste or sect, let alone the Sanskritized Hindi that is officially promulgated". Haq's Musings: Chinese Strategist Argues for India's Disintegration