What's new

Reality of Kargill....

How about using GB Scouts as expendible frontline troops while most of the army was not involved a blunder done by musharaf on the people of Pakistan and the people of GB.
 
.
Madrashas has worst education system. This is the fact , not hate. Even most of educated Muslims accept this fact.
Thats why you are brainwashed and very little mind to understand the difference between fact and hate.
you are the most ignorant nation of the world:
India Has Surpassed Mexico To Become The Most Ignorant Nation In ...
and now it is proved today..we don't need to learn the difference between fact and hate from you..first educate yourself then come and talk..
 
.
Musharaff clearly didn't want to escalate to a full war. His whole strategy was to maintain control to highlight the issue internationally, not to fight and win Kashmir in a full scale war. Of course, this begs the question why he still didn't involve the navy or air force regardless, atleast to keep them in the loop. My only opinion is he wasn't confident they'll be on board with the plan and decided to wing it.
No u are wrong , with limited naval & airforce options , he let them be ready just to defend other borders of pakistan ?
If in case india hve waged full scale option ?

How about using GB Scouts as expendible frontline troops while most of the army was not involved a blunder done by musharaf on the people of Pakistan and the people of GB.
I guss u dont hve any idea of PA at any level ?lol
 
.
No u are wrong , with limited naval & airforce options , he let them be ready just to defend other borders of pakistan ?
If in case india hve waged full scale option ?

The army and the navy is always prepared in a defensive scenario. But Kargil wasn't a defensive war for Pakistan.
 
. .
Musharaf has no shame. Whatsoever. We can slice and dice this subject forever but I would like to ask this arrogant basket few things.

  • If you had India by it's testicles [or throat] in Kargil and you were on the way to whipping India
  • Then why the fcuk did you not over throw Musharaf if as he says he began to fall apart under Clinton's presure?
  • A whole battalion of NLI was fighting for it's life. Why did you not launch a coup then? Was the sacrifices of those men not worth a coup? Was horsewhipping India not worth a coup?
  • Of course when his a*ss was on the line a coup was launched to save this waste of space and NS was jacked. But when Pak Army was on the line he remained obedient to NS.
  • Why the fcuk did you not have P{AF and PN not engaged? In particular PAF??
 
.
Why the fcuk did you not have P{AF and PN not engaged? In particular PAF??
Not required at initial stage later they were on board...rest should be debated on other thread since PAF have and has history of betrayal.

Musharaf has no shame. Whatsoever. We can slice and dice this subject forever but I would like to ask this arrogant basket few things.
Sir he has and have courage to tell the truth....N.S has and don't have shame to admit his Political failure and proven corrupt by apex courts.

If you had India by it's testicles [or throat] in Kargil and you were on the way to whipping India
I was in training at PMA when Kargill happen....We intrude 5 location and till last days even now Indian can't admit it since they were fighting with us only 2 points rest 3 they don't know and still don't admitted it.
 
.
Not required at initial stage later they were on board...rest should be debated on other thread since PAF have and has history of betrayal.
Later was too late. Not complaining though.
 
.
Then why the fcuk did you not over throw Musharaf if as he says he began to fall apart under Clinton's presure?
Since N.S knows he have jelly legs in front of Clinton...period

A whole battalion of NLI was fighting for it's life. Why did you not launch a coup then? Was the sacrifices of those men not worth a coup? Was horsewhipping India not worth a coup?
Army don't want to portray as rulers (actual rulers) hence wants to be in same pages of political Govt.

Of course when his a*ss was on the line a coup was launched to save this waste of space and NS was jacked. But when Pak Army was on the line he remained obedient to NS.
We achieved basic objects to highlight Kashmir issue that's why...

Why the fcuk did you not have P{AF and PN not engaged? In particular PAF??
Not required since operation was limited to specific area later well off one month before full excitation they were told to prepare.
 
. . .

Umm...so why does your own news channel in 2011 say it's still controlled by Pakistan?


LOL you Bharatis really are behsharam. You most 6 peaks, then tried to take them back and got your asses kicked, decided to change your maps and then dance around like monkeys. LMFAO.

Let's discuss the ground realities of what happened here:

Kargil peaks captured by Pakistan in 1999

  • Point 5353
  • Point Aftab-I
  • Point Saddle Ridge
  • Point Bunker Ridge
  • Shangruti
  • Tiger Hill
  • Dhalunag
Kargil peaks still under Pakistani control as of 2018



    • Point 5353
    • Point Aftab-I
    • Point Saddle Ridge
    • Point Bunker Ridge
    • Shangruti
    • Dhalunag

Pakistan still occupies key Drass point

By Praveen Swami

PAKISTAN soldiers perched at peak 5353, on the strategic Marpo La Ridge had a grandstand view of this year's Vijay Diwas celebrations, marking the official end of the Kargil war. At least some of them must had wry smiles on their faces, for although peak 5353 metres is inside the Indian side of the Line of Control (LoC), Pakistani troops held the mountain through the Kargil war and continue to do so today.

Artillery observers on peak 5353 metres can direct accurate artillery fire on to up to 20 km of the National Highway 1A, and cripple Indian defensive positions from Mushkoh to Bhimbet. Indian troops are being forced to compensate for this tactical blunder by engaging in a series of operations in the Batalik sector.

Pakistani occupation of point 5353 means Operation Vijay's core objective in Drass, securing the highway, in effect failed. Officials in New Delhi attempt to argue that point 5353 is in an ambiguous location on the Line of Control, and that there are two peaks of the same height which are being confused, claims debunked by copies of the Army's own maps which are in Business Line's possession.

Senior Army commanders in Drass are just as evasive. Asked if Pakistan was indeed in occupation of the peak, 8 Mountain Division Commander Major General Satnam Singh replied that it was ''too early to say''. Asked again, Gen. Singh said he would ''provide authentic information'' during this correspondent's ''next trip''. The strange story of peak 5353 began with the end of Operation Vijay, and the proclamation of a national triumph at Kargil.

Point 5353, like the features around it, had been occupied by Pakistani troops at the start of the Kargil war. Indian soldiers, however, were nowhere near its summit when hostilities were pronounced to have ended. All that had been achieved was the occupation of two secondary positions on the Marpo La ridge line, Charlie 6 and Charlie 7. Pakistani troops also remained on point 5240, some 1200 metres as the crow flies from point 5353. 56 Brigade Commander Amar Aul, in charge of the operations to secure point 5353, responded by occupying two heights on the Pakistani side of the LoC, 4875 and 4251, just before the ceasefire came into force.

Com. Aul's tactics, evidently under political pressure to bring about as quick an end to hostilities as possible, were designed to secure a subsequent territorial exchange. In mid-August, 1999, his efforts to bring about a deal bore fruit. Extended negotiations between the Brigadier and a Pakistani interlocutor, who called himself Colonel Saqlain, led to both sides committing themselves to leave points 5353, 5240, 4251 and 4875 unoccupied.

Both Indian and Pakistani troops were now pulled back to their pre-Kargil position, leaving an arial distance of about a kilometre between the armies along most of the Marpo La ridge. The deal wasn't ideal, for point 5353 was of enormously more strategic importance to India than either 4251 or 4875 were for Pakistan, but it was better than nothing.

Towards the end of October, things began to go horribly wrong. Commander Aul tasked the 16 Grenadiers to take point 5240 and the 1-3 Gurkha Rifles to occupy 5353, choosing to violate the August agreement rather than risk the prospect that Pakistan might reoccupy these positions again. While the 16 Grenadiers attack proceeded as planned, despite bad weather, the 1-3 Gurkha Rifles, for reasons which are still not clear, never made their way up 5353. When Pakistani troops detected the Indian presence on 52 40, they promptly launched a counter assault on 5353. Seven days later, in early November, the Grenadiers unit on 5240 watched Pakistan take up positions on the more important peak.

Pakistan moved rapidly to consolidate its position on 5353. Concrete bunkers came up on the peak, and a road was constructed to the base of the peak from Benazir Post, Pakistan's most important permanent position in the area. In the meanwhile, Commander Aul considered plans to retake the peak. He didn't have much choice. India's positions on 5240 were under threat, along with positions of the 2 Naga in Mushkoh, the 2 Grenadiers in Drass, and the 8 Sikh in Bhimbet. Offensives were discussed in January an d February this year, and again in May and August, but had to be abandoned each time because of the risks involved.

With 5353 and its adjoining area now linked by road to Pakistan's rear headquarters at Gultari, and defensive positions heavily fortified, any frontal attack would mean a full-blown resumption of hostilities in Drass.

The Army's tactics in Kargil now appear to centre around forcing a territorial swap for 5353. The worst of the fighting has come in the Batalik area, to the east of Kargil, where Indian troops have been ordered to take any unoccupied positions they discover on the Pakistan side of the LoC.

In one such operation on April 8, a company of the 14 Sikh Regiment occupied point 5310, an unheld peak roughly one kilometre air distance on the Pakistan side of the LoC. Subedar Bhatnam Singh and one soldier were killed in an avalanche during the operation.

Pakistan retaliation has been prompt. On the night of July 27, a group of 24 porters and four soldiers carrying material for an offensive from Gol Tekri to Rock Fall, facing the key Chorbat La range, were ambushed by Pakistani troops or irregulars. One porter was killed, and three are still missing, presumed dead. There is little doubt that the Pakistani ambush was laid deep in Indian territory for Kalashnikov empties, with a short range, were recovered from the ambush site. The incident followed the destruction, in May, of a new Pakistani post with a shoulder-held missile.

While the Union Government's propaganda on the Kargil War has allowed it to score propaganda points, the end of the conflict is, clearly, not quite yet in sight.

Quotes

  • "Pakistan is occupying at least six strategically located Indian peaks in the Kargil sector along the Line of Control" - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "Point 5353 is very strategic. In 1992-93, the then corps commander (of India) decided to make a shift pocket on this point and sent personnel there by helicopter. The officers posted there successfully cut off the entire supply to the Pakistani pockets along the LoC for nearly two months."...he said the Indian Army then claimed that point 5353 is "within our LoC and that we have every right to patrol the area." - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "Indian troops had tried to capture Point 5353 on May 18, 1999 when army operations were beginning in Operation Vijay in Kargil last year. But it failed...the operation was carried out by a team of soldiers led by Major Navneet Mehta."..."It is not possible to carry out an assault from the northwestern, western and south western approaches,"..."attack on 5353 called off due to bad weather" and that "13 OR (other ranks) injured in Maj Navneet's Pl (platoon) due to difficult trn (terrain)". - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "If the army's argument that Point 5353 was never India's is to be accepted, then why did they launch the attack?" - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "It looks like our army commanders are wrongly briefing the defence minister," he said when Fernandes' statement was pointed out. "The defence minister mislead Parliament on the basis of the briefing by army officers," Anand said, while demanding action against senior army commanders. - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)
Sources
  1. 'Commander ordered capture of Point 5353 in Kargil war', By Praveen Swami. NEW DELHI, 29 June 2000 - THE HINDU
  2. 'Pakistan still occupies key Drass point', by Praveen Swami. DRASS, 10 August 2000 - THE HINDU
  3. 'Fact and fiction on Point 5353; The defence establishment's response to the controversy over Point 5353 plumbs new depths' by Praveen Swami. 30 September 2000 - FRONTLINE
  4. ‘6 Kargil heights in Pak control’. NEW DELHI, 30 August 2000 - Tribune India
  5. 'Pakistan occupying six Indian peaks, claims MP' by Josy Joseph. NEW DELHI, 30 August 2000 - REDIFF
  6. 'Not convinced we won Kargil: Lt Gen Kishan Pal to NDTV' by Nitin Gokhale. NEW DELHI 31 May 2010 00:36 IST - NDTV
  7. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/904482.stm
  8. http://www.ipcs.org/event-report/3r...india-revises-time-frame-of-war/1/254326.html
  9. https://www.telegraphindia.com/1020828/asp/frontpage/story_1144073.asp
 
.
Umm...so why does your own news channel in 2011 say it's still controlled by Pakistan?


LOL you Bharatis really are behsharam. You most 6 peaks, then tried to take them back and got your asses kicked, decided to change your maps and then dance around like monkeys. LMFAO.

Let's discuss the ground realities of what happened here:

Kargil peaks captured by Pakistan in 1999

  • Point 5353
  • Point Aftab-I
  • Point Saddle Ridge
  • Point Bunker Ridge
  • Shangruti
  • Tiger Hill
  • Dhalunag
Kargil peaks still under Pakistani control as of 2018



    • Point 5353
    • Point Aftab-I
    • Point Saddle Ridge
    • Point Bunker Ridge
    • Shangruti
    • Dhalunag

You guys seem to be farting through your mouth now. One of the links you've provided completely contradicts your story.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/904482.stm

Pakistan has denied reports that its troops were occupying some border peaks on the Indian side of Kashmir.

A foreign ministry spokesman said Pakistan respected the Line of Control (LoC) with India and its troops had not infringed the ceasefire line.

On Wednesday, an Indian MP alleged that Pakistani troops were occupying six peaks on the Indian side of the LoC.

The MP's claim followed a report in an Indian newspaper that a strategic peak, Point 5353, was under Pakistani occupation.

But Indian parliamentarian Ram Kumar Anand says six prominent peaks - Point 5353, Point Aftab 1, Point Saddle Bridge, Point Bunker Ridge, Shangruti and Dhaulanag - are still under Pakistani control.

Mr Anand was specifically concerned about Point 5353 which, he said, provided Pakistani troops a clear view of an Indian military helipad and an important highway linking Indian Kashmir's summer capital, Srinagar, to the Ladakh region.

The parliamentarian even accused some senior Indian army officials of bungling during last year's conflict.

The army has refused to be drawn into the debate, but the BBC's Delhi correspondent says defence analysts are supportive of the army.

The analysts say there is a history of positions along the LoC changing hands from time to time, and that the issue was being blown out of proportion.

Umm...so why does your own news channel in 2011 say it's still controlled by Pakistan?


LOL you Bharatis really are behsharam. You most 6 peaks, then tried to take them back and got your asses kicked, decided to change your maps and then dance around like monkeys. LMFAO.

Let's discuss the ground realities of what happened here:

Kargil peaks captured by Pakistan in 1999

  • Point 5353
  • Point Aftab-I
  • Point Saddle Ridge
  • Point Bunker Ridge
  • Shangruti
  • Tiger Hill
  • Dhalunag
Kargil peaks still under Pakistani control as of 2018



    • Point 5353
    • Point Aftab-I
    • Point Saddle Ridge
    • Point Bunker Ridge
    • Shangruti
    • Dhalunag

Pakistan still occupies key Drass point

By Praveen Swami

PAKISTAN soldiers perched at peak 5353, on the strategic Marpo La Ridge had a grandstand view of this year's Vijay Diwas celebrations, marking the official end of the Kargil war. At least some of them must had wry smiles on their faces, for although peak 5353 metres is inside the Indian side of the Line of Control (LoC), Pakistani troops held the mountain through the Kargil war and continue to do so today.

Artillery observers on peak 5353 metres can direct accurate artillery fire on to up to 20 km of the National Highway 1A, and cripple Indian defensive positions from Mushkoh to Bhimbet. Indian troops are being forced to compensate for this tactical blunder by engaging in a series of operations in the Batalik sector.

Pakistani occupation of point 5353 means Operation Vijay's core objective in Drass, securing the highway, in effect failed. Officials in New Delhi attempt to argue that point 5353 is in an ambiguous location on the Line of Control, and that there are two peaks of the same height which are being confused, claims debunked by copies of the Army's own maps which are in Business Line's possession.

Senior Army commanders in Drass are just as evasive. Asked if Pakistan was indeed in occupation of the peak, 8 Mountain Division Commander Major General Satnam Singh replied that it was ''too early to say''. Asked again, Gen. Singh said he would ''provide authentic information'' during this correspondent's ''next trip''. The strange story of peak 5353 began with the end of Operation Vijay, and the proclamation of a national triumph at Kargil.

Point 5353, like the features around it, had been occupied by Pakistani troops at the start of the Kargil war. Indian soldiers, however, were nowhere near its summit when hostilities were pronounced to have ended. All that had been achieved was the occupation of two secondary positions on the Marpo La ridge line, Charlie 6 and Charlie 7. Pakistani troops also remained on point 5240, some 1200 metres as the crow flies from point 5353. 56 Brigade Commander Amar Aul, in charge of the operations to secure point 5353, responded by occupying two heights on the Pakistani side of the LoC, 4875 and 4251, just before the ceasefire came into force.

Com. Aul's tactics, evidently under political pressure to bring about as quick an end to hostilities as possible, were designed to secure a subsequent territorial exchange. In mid-August, 1999, his efforts to bring about a deal bore fruit. Extended negotiations between the Brigadier and a Pakistani interlocutor, who called himself Colonel Saqlain, led to both sides committing themselves to leave points 5353, 5240, 4251 and 4875 unoccupied.

Both Indian and Pakistani troops were now pulled back to their pre-Kargil position, leaving an arial distance of about a kilometre between the armies along most of the Marpo La ridge. The deal wasn't ideal, for point 5353 was of enormously more strategic importance to India than either 4251 or 4875 were for Pakistan, but it was better than nothing.

Towards the end of October, things began to go horribly wrong. Commander Aul tasked the 16 Grenadiers to take point 5240 and the 1-3 Gurkha Rifles to occupy 5353, choosing to violate the August agreement rather than risk the prospect that Pakistan might reoccupy these positions again. While the 16 Grenadiers attack proceeded as planned, despite bad weather, the 1-3 Gurkha Rifles, for reasons which are still not clear, never made their way up 5353. When Pakistani troops detected the Indian presence on 52 40, they promptly launched a counter assault on 5353. Seven days later, in early November, the Grenadiers unit on 5240 watched Pakistan take up positions on the more important peak.

Pakistan moved rapidly to consolidate its position on 5353. Concrete bunkers came up on the peak, and a road was constructed to the base of the peak from Benazir Post, Pakistan's most important permanent position in the area. In the meanwhile, Commander Aul considered plans to retake the peak. He didn't have much choice. India's positions on 5240 were under threat, along with positions of the 2 Naga in Mushkoh, the 2 Grenadiers in Drass, and the 8 Sikh in Bhimbet. Offensives were discussed in January an d February this year, and again in May and August, but had to be abandoned each time because of the risks involved.

With 5353 and its adjoining area now linked by road to Pakistan's rear headquarters at Gultari, and defensive positions heavily fortified, any frontal attack would mean a full-blown resumption of hostilities in Drass.

The Army's tactics in Kargil now appear to centre around forcing a territorial swap for 5353. The worst of the fighting has come in the Batalik area, to the east of Kargil, where Indian troops have been ordered to take any unoccupied positions they discover on the Pakistan side of the LoC.

In one such operation on April 8, a company of the 14 Sikh Regiment occupied point 5310, an unheld peak roughly one kilometre air distance on the Pakistan side of the LoC. Subedar Bhatnam Singh and one soldier were killed in an avalanche during the operation.

Pakistan retaliation has been prompt. On the night of July 27, a group of 24 porters and four soldiers carrying material for an offensive from Gol Tekri to Rock Fall, facing the key Chorbat La range, were ambushed by Pakistani troops or irregulars. One porter was killed, and three are still missing, presumed dead. There is little doubt that the Pakistani ambush was laid deep in Indian territory for Kalashnikov empties, with a short range, were recovered from the ambush site. The incident followed the destruction, in May, of a new Pakistani post with a shoulder-held missile.

While the Union Government's propaganda on the Kargil War has allowed it to score propaganda points, the end of the conflict is, clearly, not quite yet in sight.

Quotes

  • "Pakistan is occupying at least six strategically located Indian peaks in the Kargil sector along the Line of Control" - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "Point 5353 is very strategic. In 1992-93, the then corps commander (of India) decided to make a shift pocket on this point and sent personnel there by helicopter. The officers posted there successfully cut off the entire supply to the Pakistani pockets along the LoC for nearly two months."...he said the Indian Army then claimed that point 5353 is "within our LoC and that we have every right to patrol the area." - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "Indian troops had tried to capture Point 5353 on May 18, 1999 when army operations were beginning in Operation Vijay in Kargil last year. But it failed...the operation was carried out by a team of soldiers led by Major Navneet Mehta."..."It is not possible to carry out an assault from the northwestern, western and south western approaches,"..."attack on 5353 called off due to bad weather" and that "13 OR (other ranks) injured in Maj Navneet's Pl (platoon) due to difficult trn (terrain)". - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "If the army's argument that Point 5353 was never India's is to be accepted, then why did they launch the attack?" - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)

  • "It looks like our army commanders are wrongly briefing the defence minister," he said when Fernandes' statement was pointed out. "The defence minister mislead Parliament on the basis of the briefing by army officers," Anand said, while demanding action against senior army commanders. - Rajya Sabha member & senior criminal advocate R K Anand. (30 August 2000)
Sources
  1. 'Commander ordered capture of Point 5353 in Kargil war', By Praveen Swami. NEW DELHI, 29 June 2000 - THE HINDU
  2. 'Pakistan still occupies key Drass point', by Praveen Swami. DRASS, 10 August 2000 - THE HINDU
  3. 'Fact and fiction on Point 5353; The defence establishment's response to the controversy over Point 5353 plumbs new depths' by Praveen Swami. 30 September 2000 - FRONTLINE
  4. ‘6 Kargil heights in Pak control’. NEW DELHI, 30 August 2000 - Tribune India
  5. 'Pakistan occupying six Indian peaks, claims MP' by Josy Joseph. NEW DELHI, 30 August 2000 - REDIFF
  6. 'Not convinced we won Kargil: Lt Gen Kishan Pal to NDTV' by Nitin Gokhale. NEW DELHI 31 May 2010 00:36 IST - NDTV
  7. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/904482.stm
  8. http://www.ipcs.org/event-report/3r...india-revises-time-frame-of-war/1/254326.html
  9. https://www.telegraphindia.com/1020828/asp/frontpage/story_1144073.asp

Let me peel the banana and feed you the info. The authour of your sources Praveen Swamy also describes it in length here. Point 5330 lies on the LOC. These points were neither occupied by IA or PA. WHen Pakistan army captured it, Indian howitzers smoked the PA personnel from Pt 5330. here's the excerpt from the article.

https://www.thehindu.com/2004/03/10/stories/2004031001731200.htm

Indian soldiers on three posts, namely Point 5165, Point 5240 and Point 5100, guided their superior 155-millimetre Bofors howitzers with devastating accuracy. Pakistani troops on Point 5353 were first hit with smoke-filled mortar shells, to flush them out of their bunkers, and then with air-burst artillery, which showered down shards of metal at great speed. Well over 40 Pakistanis are believed to have died on Point 5353. Pakistan could not reinforce the troops since the Indian soldiers on Point 5165 and Point 5240 were in a position to hit their supply lines.

Drop your tears here! :cry::cry:
 
.
Small scale limited operation for specific land gains not required to prepare PAF or PN in advance but later both got full month for preparations.

That my dear is a recipe for disaster.

When one arm of the military considers herself to be so strong and brilliant that it can do every thing by herself and later is forced to take the other arms on board.
 
.
How about using GB Scouts as expendible frontline troops while most of the army was not involved a blunder done by musharaf on the people of Pakistan and the people of GB.
The whole problem was using Uniformed Regulars. The use of irregulars in J&K was being continued in 1990's without any big problems.

In 1971, Indian Military used Mukti Bahini and then formally entered behind their cover into E-Pak in a full fledged war.
In modern times, Indian Military is in Afghanistan, in the form of Commandos and RAW. The commandos had been sent to protect Indian consulates and nationals, but they have also trained ANA SF. Indian Military doesn't enter as uniformed Regulars into Balochistan and FATA, they use BLA, BRA, TTP etc. And the attacks continue inside Pakistan, though they have subsided now.

The Surgical strike drama was involving Uniformed Regulars who crossed an imaginary LOC, attacked imaginary targets and then retreated into some imaginary realm. This stunt with uniformed Regulars cannot be done easily. Now come to reality, since Mumbai attacks in 2008, how many times IAF has crossed IB and attacked targets inside Pakistan and succeeded? None. Because if it happens, it can and it will lead to an escalation to a full war.

The irregulars in J&K were giving a bloody nose to IA and BSF, there was not a crucial requirement to plan and implement a siege which eventually had to involve Regulars of PA.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom