What's new

Real Covid 19 vaccine efficacy

Song Hong

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
5,058
Reaction score
-25
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Singapore
From Hungary.

Winner is Russian Sputnik V. Normalized to 100,000 people, as below. I would say Moderna and Sinovac tie. Reason is large number of death cases 72 hours after taking Moderna, while very little death cases for Sinovac. Moderna also has very little sample. If large enough sample is taken, Sinovac may win.

I believe the my countries have their own data already. Most fear to release it. For releasing the data, GoH is being whacked by pro US opposition accusing all data are fake.

Infected

Sputnik-V 95
Moderna 177
Sinopharm 356
Pfizer 555
Astrazeneca 700
Osszesen 408

Death

Sputnik-V 1
Moderna 20
Sinopharm 16
Pfizer 32
Astrazeneca 7
Osszesen 20





1619558558600.png
 
. .
Translate this chart if possible please!

I show you the webpage where you can google translate.

Those cheer leaders of US vaccine will get their face slap in future. Scientists and engineers have a problem of not being able to lie.

******************


Data were also reported by vaccine:

3048 after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations, 1744 after Sinopharm vaccine, 613 after AstraZeneca vaccine, 201 after Sputnik vaccine and 108 after Moderna vaccine

175 died after vaccinations with Pfizer-BioNTech, 78 after Sinopharm, 12 after Moderna, six after AstraZeneca and two after Sputnik

The number of cases per 100,000 vaccinated is the lowest at Sputnik (95) and the highest at AstraZeneca (700). The number of deaths per 100,000 vaccinated is also the lowest at Sputnik (1) and the highest at Pfizer / BioNTech (32). After Sinopharm vaccination, 78 people died, which is 16 per 100,000 vaccinees.
 
.
I show you the webpage where you can google translate.

Those cheer leaders of US vaccine will get their face slap in future. Scientists and engineers have a problem of not being able to lie.

******************


Data were also reported by vaccine:

3048 after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations, 1744 after Sinopharm vaccine, 613 after AstraZeneca vaccine, 201 after Sputnik vaccine and 108 after Moderna vaccine

175 died after vaccinations with Pfizer-BioNTech, 78 after Sinopharm, 12 after Moderna, six after AstraZeneca and two after Sputnik

The number of cases per 100,000 vaccinated is the lowest at Sputnik (95) and the highest at AstraZeneca (700). The number of deaths per 100,000 vaccinated is also the lowest at Sputnik (1) and the highest at Pfizer / BioNTech (32). After Sinopharm vaccination, 78 people died, which is 16 per 100,000 vaccinees.
There's some criticism coming as well.

People are saying that Sputnik and Sinopharm were not given to chronic patients. And pfizer testing period was 4 months, while others were less.

Anyway, I think all vaccines are showing promise.
 
.
From Hungary.

Winner is Russian Sputnik V. Normalized to 100,000 people, as below. I would say Moderna and Sinovac tie. Reason is large number of death cases 72 hours after taking Moderna, while very little death cases for Sinovac. Moderna also has very little sample. If large enough sample is taken, Sinovac may win.

I believe the my countries have their own data already. Most fear to release it. For releasing the data, GoH is being whacked by pro US opposition accusing all data are fake.

Infected

Sputnik-V 95
Moderna 177
Sinopharm 356
Pfizer 555
Astrazeneca 700
Osszesen 408

Death

Sputnik-V 1
Moderna 20
Sinopharm 16
Pfizer 32
Astrazeneca 7
Osszesen 20





View attachment 738036

Of course, bestie Putin’s vaccine will be super stronk. ..and then the Chinese vaccine at 10x the price of AstraZeneca also should be next stronkest :lol: .

And please use your god given brain for once 740 people died in Hungary from Pfizer shot and yet instead of banning Pfizer, Hungary just purchased an additional 10 million doses of Pfizer. Something doesn’t add up - does it?




 
.
"Chinese vaccines are dangerous." Turns out to be another blatant lie spread by U.S. regime mouthpieces and dumb trolls just making up shit playing out racist stereotypes and proven wrong by later turnouts
"Chinese vaccines are defective" Turns out to be another blatant lie spread by U.S. regime mouthpieces and carried by dumb trolls, disingeniously pulling numbers out of context and plastering false assumptions into headlines and proven wrong by later turnouts
"Chinese vaccines are overpriced" Turns out to be another blatant lie spread by U.S. regime mouthpieces and carried by dumb trolls, pulling falsified numbers out of dubious sources and plastering false claims into headlines and proven wrong by later turnouts

Who could have expected that... 🙄
 
. .
There's some criticism coming as well.

People are saying that Sputnik and Sinopharm were not given to chronic patients. And pfizer testing period was 4 months, while others were less.

Anyway, I think all vaccines are showing promise.

i think this is more of the bottom line of a situation rather than supposed stats:

 
.
Look like in an outbreak setting such as open borders Sinopharm did better than Pfizer with no blood clots.
 
.
I took Sinovac about two weeks ago
1619664828155.png


Flower blooming along the road in Beijing, the vaccine center is not far from my place, I can talk there
1619664840073.png


Took a roast chicken for dinner in the market
1619664862721.png
 
.
Back
Top Bottom