Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Btw, keep in mind Ayaz Sadiq had a stay order on this before as well...maybe he'll play the legal game again and get stays
Lol funnily Ayaz Sadiq moments before gave a statement that "jo bhi result aye ga mein qabol karloonga aur ager against aya to 'chup chaap chala jaoonga' "
well as i said how he won 3rd time is arguable & debatable, but all out saying that Ayaz Sadiq was/is totally unknown is were i disagree one need to be fair & honestBut This time Ayaz Sadiq's position at NA-122 was very weak, its my former constituency i used to live there 10 years ago. From all points of view it was pointing to a strong win for IK from NA-122 and i assure you IK was leading ayaz sadiq by atleast 30k votes and then the major uturn happened overnight within an hour and ayaz sadiq got the lead suddenly..same with Saad Rafique and hamid khan..in the end Saad Rafique defeated Hamid Khan by 40k votes LOL thats the exact amount by which he was losing to him a couple of hours earlier I can't say about previous elections but for the 2013 election, Ayaz sadiq had already lost.
not a big deal...Speaker is gone, Now, who will accept resignation of MQM.?
Lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
The wording of the decision is very important. If it says dhandhli then it will be the end for him but the decision says irregularities and not dhandhli which means in supreme court ayaz sadiq may argue in courts that irregularities are not his fault and Imran had filed dhandhli petition and this may create a mess
Frankly ayaz Sadiq will stay on. Wordings are very important in courts.
well as i said how he won 3rd time is arguable & debatable, but all out saying that Ayaz Sadiq was/is totally unknown is were i disagree one need to be fair & honest
No dandli word will be used . It is not possible to prove that a candidate did dandli. Just imagine how can you manage to prove it . Unless there is a video or audio or if the candidate will be so stupid that all the thappas himself with his thumb printsThe wording of the decision is very important. If it says dhandhli then it will be the end for him but the decision says irregularities and not dhandhli which means in supreme court ayaz sadiq may argue in courts that irregularities are not his fault and Imran had filed dhandhli petition and this may create a mess
Frankly ayaz Sadiq will stay on. Wordings are very important in courts.
I partly agree but seriously Massive irregularities=Dhandhli.
i dont know the ground realities, so i'll take ur word for itIam not saying that ayaz sadiq was an unknown quantity in NA-122 but his rep. wasn't very good in 2013 and IK was on a roll with his support up to the clouds. I still can't fathom a weak ayaz sadiq beating IK in those questionable conditions in 2013.
i dont know the ground realities, so i'll take ur word for it