Wow, i never thought about it that way. I am not the type who'd abuse anyone's religion with the rare exception of indian hardline hindus who happen to be the most vilest of creatures. Although i never go for below the belt vitriol. Nothing against absolutely anyone from any other background. I didn't know Mazar e Sharif had religious connections so again sincere apologies for my ignorance.
Regarding you, i find you rather condescending in your remarks. Hence, my comment. Nevertheless, i did learn a thing or two from you so there's hope. Have a good day.
I've been here since 2009 and like other veterans seen and heard and done it all. So we do at times come across as bored or condescending hearing something said by someone new for the 1001th time. Nothing more to it. This is not the real world.
I thought the Mazar i Sharif is a shared Pashtun monumnet and not just an Afghan one. So you being Pukhtun I thought I was dealing with either an atheist or a sarkari Pashtun.
Cheers, Doc
There is a slight problem with that. India was not created as a Hindu state rather so called secular. If you want to reinvent yourself, you basically have to go back to 1947 and do another partition among you because most of the minorities like Muslims, Sikhs etc didn't sign on the dotted lines to be part of Hindu India.
Bollocks.
Secular was an afterthought put in decades later by Indira Gandhi.
There will be no signing.
There will be years, even decades if and where and when necessary, of mollycoddling and cajoling.
And finally bullets.