Rana Sanaullah won't find place to hide in Islamabad, warns Imran Khan

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

Former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan on Thursday while reacting to the threat of Minister for Interior warned Rana Sanaullah that he wouldn’t find place in Islamabad to hide because this time they [PTI] will come fully prepared.

Addressing party convention in Islamabad on Thursday, he said that the Freedom is never given on a plate but sacrifices have to be made to gain real independence.

“Those who have hijacked the system have become billionaires and they will never give us freedom easily,” Imran Khan said adding that the movement for real freedom is the biggest after Tehreek-e-Pakistan.

Reacting to the threats of the interior minister, Imran warned Rana Sanaullah that he would not find a place to hide in Islamabad if he adopts the same brutality and violence against peaceful marchers at this time.

The PTI chairman said that a coward person cannot become a great leader, adding that a person, who can control and end his fear, can become a big leader.

The former PM went on to say that he was trying to explain to the nation what kind of Medina welfare state was and also urged the party workers to join his long march when he gives a call, adding that this is a testing time for the PTI workers and the nation

Rana Sanaullah won't find place to hide in Islamabad, warns Imran Khan

Rana Sanaullah won’t find place to hide in Islamabad, warns Imran Khan

dunyanews.tv

 

[PakFactor]

First, has he found out where his father is hiding?

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

 

[El Sidd]

How can one threaten a state minister?

 

[Maea]

How can one threaten a state minister?

Well, anyone can threaten the state minister, its how the state and its instituitions react to the said threat that sets apart a strong nation from a weak nation.

 

[M. Sarmad]

How can one threaten a state minister?

Read again. The news article says that IK reacted to the threats of a State Minister.

It's the criminal state minister who had been threatening his political opponents and their followers.

Are the state ministers/PDM above law, according to you ?

 

[alphapak]

The people are ready to drag these thugs out and give them a beating of a lifetime.
They are even threatening Youtubers, bloody low lifes.

 

[Goritoes]

do something you idiot, you are issuing stupid threats... Country like Pakistan and people like Pakistani's if you beg them they won't give you sh!t, a powerful leader is needed who can make strong decision, IK has to use force to boot out corrupt Politicians/Generals/Judges/Journalist or else he will keep issuing statements while the scums of society will keep their power and laugh at his sorry A$$.

 

[maverick1977]

How can one threaten a state minister?

everyone should threaten this criminal.. shame on you to even saying that, when u know the whole system is a sham

 

[El Sidd]

Well, anyone can threaten the state minister, its how the state and its instituitions react to the said threat that sets apart a strong nation from a weak nation.

A simple case for the police becomes a question for whole nations legacy, there lies the problem. Mundane and the routine is where energy can be saved.

Read again. The news article says that IK reacted to the threats of a State Minister

So he is threatening the office rather than the minister? Makes more sense now.

Are the state ministers/PDM above law, according to you ?

What went through your mind to ask this rhetorical question is of more interesting conversation than the rhetorical answer you expect.

everyone should threaten this criminal.. shame on you to even saying that, when u know the whole system is a sham

Why must anyone choose violent means? The whole system is sham mantra is resulting in more domestic violence in the country.

 

[maverick1977]

A simple case for the police becomes a question for whole nations legacy, there lies the problem. Mundane and the routine is where energy can be saved.

So he is threatening the office rather than the minister? Makes more sense now.

What went through your mind to ask this rhetorical question is of more interesting conversation than the rhetorical answer you expect.


Why must anyone choose violent means? The whole system is sham mantra is resulting in more domestic violence in the country.

Violence happens when the justice system fails…

when law is upheld irrespective of social status, people generally are happy, prgressing and violence is contained