............................
Blind and foolish are those who miss the big potholes on the roads of a capital but point to building a temple as the reason for that potholes
As to the existence of the Ram Temple, you do not have to spin a new "secular fact". The Allahabad High Court has conclusively established it after viewing Archaeological evidence.
eLegalix - Ayodhya Bench Decision (Full Judgment)
I don't think anyone on this forum would have the details of the finding available with them. The best they could post is link to some site to prove their point but if you really think that the court erred reading the findings and you can read and analyze them better then who has stopped you from going to the higher courts & challenging the verdict. You will get no result debating about it on an online forum.
The archaeological findings are available in detail and analyzed thoroughly. The point is the politicians of this country should focus more on issues which need urgent attention. In stead they look more interested on banning mini skirts, building temples or defining who is a Hindu or not.
Ok, then. I am backing off from the discussion too.
even if it is proved that the temple was destroyed and a mosque was build over it by babur, you still cant build a temple there. because the land right belongs to a specific person/org which happens to be on muslim side.
There are ample evidences of a temple structure beneath the mosque but there is neither any proof that it had been considered as a birth place of Lord Rama, nor there is a single evidence that Babar destroyed it. The whole thing sets up a very wrong precedent to the whole nation, INDIC. We can ignore it now without realizing its further significance.
............. how blind can you be ? ..... or pretend to be.Every body knows temples were destroyed. What new facts do it bring in?LOL....if it is proved that the temple was destroyed and a mosque was built there then the land ownership automatically transfers to the Hindus.
Especially since the land was given to the muslims by the same muslim king who destroyed the temple and build the mosque
EVEN when the mosque was built, historical evidence show it remained a Hindu place of worship and hindu pilgrims continued to treat it like a temple .
Lastly BY LAW if the possession of the place is by Hindus for at least 14 years, the law states that the land now LEGALLY belong to the Hindus .............. its called The Doctrine of Adverse Possession.
This is because under India law a temple legally belongs to the presiding deity, and in this case is Lord Ram lala for the last 70 odd years.
Even other wise since it's been proven that a temple existed there, the ownership of the temple reverts back to the presiding god and since god is ageless, the land belongs to him for all of perpetuity.
Finally I already know you are a muslim, why don't you come out in the open and declare it ?
Wrong again .......I have quoted multiple proof that demonstrates evidence that first babur and then Auranzeb had destroyed the temple and associated structures.
No proof of it being ram birthplace is required as its a matter of faith. The court cannot decide on that matter. It can only decide on land ownership
Nothing can justify destruction of any religious places on the basis of doctored belief. It was a crime and dark spot on the nation's commitment for a secular constitution. If you don't wanna believe it, don't believe it.No rebuilding the Temple sends a VERY WRONG precedent to the whole nation and to the whole world. If it could not be ignored for the last 400 years what makes you think it can be ignored now
LOL....if it is proved that the temple was destroyed and a mosque was built there then the land ownership automatically transfers to the Hindus.
Especially since the land was given to the muslims by the same muslim king who destroyed the temple and build the mosque
EVEN when the mosque was built, historical evidence show it remained a Hindu place of worship and hindu pilgrims continued to treat it like a temple .
Lastly BY LAW if the possession of the place is by Hindus for at least 14 years, the law states that the land now LEGALLY belong to the Hindus .............. its called The Doctrine of Adverse Possession.
This is because under India law a temple legally belongs to the presiding deity, and in this case is Lord Ram lala for the last 70 odd years.
Even other wise since it's been proven that a temple existed there, the ownership of the temple reverts back to the presiding god and since god is ageless, the land belongs to him for all of perpetuity.
Finally I already know you are a muslim, why don't you come out in the open and declare it ?
Wrong again .......I have quoted multiple proof that demonstrates evidence that first babur and then Auranzeb had destroyed the temple and associated structures.
No proof of it being ram birthplace is required as its a matter of faith. The court cannot decide on that matter. It can only decide on land ownership
No rebuilding the Temple sends a VERY WRONG precedent to the whole nation and to the whole world. If it could not be ignored for the last 400 years what makes you think it can be ignored now
Being wilfully blind to a 400 year on injury and sore on the body of Hindu consciousness just to appease muslims is the height of religious pandering and minority appeasement.
........... When 70 years of negotiation fails then what follows next is inevitable. 
