Apprentice
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
- Messages
- 665
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
I thought the Pakistani historical narrative, was region of Pakistan historical had nothing to do with India, and Pakistan always was more related to Turks, Central Asians and Persians.
Good to see you admit your nation was historically part of India
PS: your grand achievement of dividing India has resulted in approx 500 million Muslims of subcontinent being divided into 3 part, probably the major reason why subcontinent's Muslims seem to submissive attitude towards Arabs or leaching off Turkish and Afghan victories.
By dividing Muslims of subcontinent into 3 parts, Pakistanis have merely continued with their historical tradition of being divided and not forming an empire, which led over 2400 years of uninterrupted subjugation by external empires from Achaemenids, Greeks, Huns, Sycthicans, Arabs, Turks, Afghans and finally the British.
I guess some things never change.
Well its true Turks, Persians and Central Asians had their influence on present day Pakistan but we all know Pakistan was once part of sacred Hindu land. No one can dispute that. Sindh and Punjab in particular, but even Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was once ruled and populated by Hindus as well as Afghanistan and Balochistan. One of Hinduism's most sacred temples is in Balochistan, Hinglaj Mata.
How does it feel to see one quarter of Hindu holy land now part of 2 Muslim countries?
I guess it might also bother you that I am a Muslim descendant of Kashmiri pandits.