KRAIT
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 16,971
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
Just reveal your real country. We know you are not Indian.Modi is chor PM of India.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just reveal your real country. We know you are not Indian.Modi is chor PM of India.
No, I don't make it my business to follow You.
I have seen plenty of your entries and so far 100 % negative vs India.
That is why I asked.
I generally avoid arguing about things I know little about.
But that's just me.
I do see how facts were tweaked in Your OP.
The OP contains the proof of the false comparision.
The meaning of a dispute is the opposing claims on the land.
Clearly the Bhutanese consider this their land, and the Chinese consider it theirs.
For the Chinese to unilaterally change the status quo by building roads on a disputed territory is an act of war and bullying!
If the Chinese claim they are building a road on their "land" then by the same logic Indian troops are parked Bhutanese land.
At least he has written a thorough article, very exhaustive and has backed it up with sources.
And here you are putting a dent into his article. Trying to be frivolous just because he is against Modi?
Man you are one pathetic yet disguised Indian living in Sweden.
You don't even seem to know an A of aviation, and you are out to malign a journalist whose bread n butter is earned from writing daily articles.
I repeat & reiterate, you do not know an "A" of aviation.
Here is a little test for you to come clear with Google at your disposal:
View attachment 419091
2)
View attachment 419092
3)
View attachment 419093
4)
View attachment 419094
5)
View attachment 419095
Come clean on these first, then attack others.
Its a Bhutanese and Chinese disputed land as agreed by Bhutan.
India has no business to transgress.
Its a Bhutanese and Chinese disputed land as agreed by Bhutan.
India has no business to transgress.
1) Its a button (If you like that area, its RED LIGHT)
2) KIGECA and 97531
3) I only know two keys. Public key and private key.
4) The one in the drivers seat.
5) Its a drivers seat.
Now, if you are happy with these answers, stop this nonsense of being anti national because Modi in power.
India has ALL business being there as being the representative of Bhutan to protect Bhutanese territory!
Please show me where Bhutan (Official govt.) has objected to Indian placement of troops to protect their sovereignty. If anything, our agreement with Bhutan requires us to be there at their behest.
This behest came from where on what grounds in what form?
Just because someone by the name of Peshwa says so?
Has Bhutan (Official Govt, NOT bloggers) in any shape or form objected to this placement of Indian troops?
If so, please go ahead and put the evidence forth and ill retract my statement publicly.
At least he has written a thorough article, very exhaustive and has backed it up with sources.
And here you are putting a dent into his article. Trying to be frivolous just because he is against Modi?
Man you are one pathetic yet disguised Indian living in Sweden.
You don't even seem to know an A of aviation, and you are out to malign a journalist whose bread n butter is earned from writing daily articles.
I repeat & reiterate, you do not know an "A" of aviation.
Here is a little test for you to come clear with Google at your disposal:
View attachment 419091
2)
View attachment 419092
3)
View attachment 419093
4)
View attachment 419094
5)
View attachment 419095
Come clean on these first, then attack others.
Its a Bhutanese and Chinese disputed land as agreed by Bhutan.
India has no business to transgress.
Its not Bhutan's interest but India's own security under threat, that makes India to object and send its millitary. If the road is built, the connectivity to NE is in real danger tomorrow if it is not today.
But China may not start (if they like to) the war at that end where the damage will be very high.
It would like to do it at Kashmir with the help of Pakistan on the other end and Kashmiri activists in the middle.
This is my personal opinion and anyone can differ.
If there is any war happens, it will be India facing two and half opponents.
Just reveal your real country. We know you are not Indian.
You are the one who said that the Indian army went there at Bhutan's behest.
The onus is on you to substantiate that behest.
Not me.
Nothing my doing.
You have to back up your own to be credible.
Has Bhutan (Official Govt, NOT bloggers) in any shape or form objected to this placement of Indian troops?
If so, please go ahead and put the evidence forth and ill retract my statement publicly.
At least he has written a thorough article, very exhaustive and has backed it up with sources.
And here you are putting a dent into his article. Trying to be frivolous just because he is against Modi?
Man you are one pathetic yet disguised Indian living in Sweden.
You don't even seem to know an A of aviation, and you are out to malign a journalist whose bread n butter is earned from writing daily articles.
BHUTANESE territory according to the Bhutanese POV.