What's new

Race backlash against Nina Davuluri shows OUR true colours

.
I have, almost all parts of India, from Sopore to Kanyakumari to Ahmadabad to Guwahati and everything in-between.

And I testify to the fact that there is not a single corner in India where discrimination does not exist, be it based on skin color, ethnicity, financial standing, or gender.

There is no racism, but only for the fact that people do not even know what races are.



The current President of the US is half Kenyan, and also carries Native blood in his veins. The natives in the US have their own distinct laws and 'nations' inside the US and Canada that only they are privileged to, for as long as they are pure.

You cannot even imagine how apologetic an average white American feels toward the natives, even if his/her ancestors migrated to the US in the 20th century and had absolutely nothing to do with any discrimination toward any colored group.

May be if you traveled wide and far you would know where we South Asians stand with respect to the US. But I guess you are one of those who look the other way whenever a black is teased or discriminated against in public places, or a when white visitor is treated like some sort of God in India.

I have no Idea, whether the current gen of Americans are "too" apologetic towards the killngs, massacres of natives of the past. USA is a multi cultural, yes. But the multi cultures people arent nativians. They themselves made USA home, without the consent of people who had the America home.
A black or white is the same for me. Infact I can relate more with the blacks than other people. Talking about racism, Chris gayle is currently the most famous cricketer in India, probably after Dhoni.
Maybe u treat Whites as God, But I am not so sure.

Oh yes I have, I have seen how the "locals" in India treat the African students!

I was replying to the dude who was yakking commenting on US multiculturalism anyways.:pop:

And we have seen how the foreigners treat the "Locals" in USA.

Look buddy, I am not making it a USA vs India contest. Indian multiculturism is different, while Americanism is different. A multicultural society has to be plural. What is American culture? No one knows. The current culture is a mixture of European people, added lately to its mixture are South Asians and East Asians. Thats it. India isnt like that.
 
.
We don't want to be multi-cultural, we've always been of one culture and one language.

And this country was founded by European immigrants, not Native Americans. That's a lie told to you by your 3rd world teachers. The Natives were too busy colonizing each other and annexing the borderless tribes next door to care about the European presence. I have no shame for the founding of our country; it was as bloody and gruesome as any other founding of a nation.



Hmmm, and I thought Indians were supposed to be lovers of multi-racialism and all that stuff? That's what the dim-witted Indian retard JayAtl led me to believe.... lol

Well, Someone was telling me in this thread that USA was Multicultural. And you are proving , America isnt, for some extent.

Before the European man landed in America, there was no America. America as we know it today would not have existed if it weren't for European pioneers, inventors, intellectuals, explorers, philosophers, etc..

That doesnt mean, they have to violently kill the natives. Get the point.
 
.
Hmmm, and I thought Indians were supposed to be lovers of multi-racialism and all that stuff? That's what the dim-witted Indian retard JayAtl led me to believe.... lol

Yea cause to be a supporter of multiculturalism and ethnicity you have to love blacks. We aren't stupid. Look at how safe Canada is compared to America. Look at the best parts of America and its worst. One can see a common thread emerges: the more africans the worse the location. They bring a state of social and physical malaise.
 
. . .
Whites arent natives to America. Atleast not during that time, period.

They were there before american indians,this can't be disputed anymore due to archeological discoveries.Now if they were killed and forced to go extinct by the the "indians" who came to the continent some 10.000 years ago suddenly it isn't genocide just because it happenned long ago?
 
.
Actually european caucasian men were first in America :"Upon examination, the 5 feet 9 inches tall specimen had "characteristics that are similar to those of Europeans."

Cro-Magnon skeletons discovered in North America

So,the whites just returned home,no biggy.This trigered the "burry them bones syndrome" amongst many so called native americans.

We can also conclude that the so called native americans(indians-populary called) commited genocide against the native european caucasian inhabitants when they arrived,a crime that they haven't answered for.:ashamed:

What does it by mean by characteristics similar to Europeans? Does it simply mean Caucasian features or..? And if you are going to go back 27 thousand or so years then why stop there? Go all the way back and say black people have the right to the whole of this planet since they were there first.

They were there before american indians,this can't be disputed anymore due to archeological discoveries.Now if they were killed and forced to go extinct by the the "indians" who came to the continent some 10.000 years ago suddenly it isn't genocide just because it happenned long ago?

No evidence exists of a white genocide though.
 
.
What does it by mean by characteristics similar to Europeans? Does it simply mean Caucasian features or..? And if you are going to go back 27 thousand or so years then why stop there? Go all the way back and say black people have the right to the whole of this planet since they were there first.



No evidence exists of a white genocide though.

They were not there anymore...i doubt that the mammoths killed them.
Ok,so what's the time table on a genocide ? I call dibs for 20 years ago maximum,everything else should fall under "sh^t hapenned in the past"
 
.
They were not there anymore...i doubt that the mammoths killed them.
Ok,so what's the time table on a genocide ? I call dibs for 20 years ago maximum,everything else should fall under "sh^t hapenned in the past"

lol. No I doubt the mammoths killed them. But what I gather from your posts is that you're saying that European americans have somehow more right than the native americans on the American continent, all based on a obscure link to an early human ancestor. A bit like neaderthals lol.
And lets not forget it was likely that the cro magnon that migrated into the American continent were their mongoloid cousins who went east to asia, instead of their counterparts who went west? since the land bridge existed on the Asian continent.
 
.
We don't want to be multi-cultural, we've always been of one culture and one language.

And this country was founded by European immigrants, not Native Americans. That's a lie told to you by your 3rd world teachers. The Natives were too busy colonizing each other and annexing the borderless tribes next door to care about the European presence. I have no shame for the founding of our country; it was as bloody and gruesome as any other founding of a nation.



Hmmm, and I thought Indians were supposed to be lovers of multi-racialism and all that stuff? That's what the dim-witted Indian retard JayAtl led me to believe.... lol

I agree about one culture, one system and one language but using the words "3rd world teachers" is inappropriate ;)
 
.
They were there before american indians,this can't be disputed anymore due to archeological discoveries.Now if they were killed and forced to go extinct by the the "indians" who came to the continent some 10.000 years ago suddenly it isn't genocide just because it happenned long ago?

What evidence? ur evidence? European caucasians in America? :lol:
Making up a stand up comedy.! Heard of mongoloids moving to America from East Asia, long ago, as the distance of crossing is very less. And you talk of from Europe to America.
Good BS.
 
.
Anything on topic dude ???

That's one ugly Miss America. How in the hell did she win?
I'm not saying that because she's Indian, but because there are much better looking Indian women out there.
 
.
What evidence? ur evidence? European caucasians in America? :lol:
Making up a stand up comedy.! Heard of mongoloids moving to America from East Asia, long ago, as the distance of crossing is very less. And you talk of from Europe to America.
Good BS.

Archeological evidence,you know ,the science that digs up bones ,studies them and establishes their age and whome did they belong. Read about it,it may bring you in the 21st century.

Until then,i will spoon feed you a little.One of many articles if you would care to search:

http://www.utexas.edu/courses/stross/ant322m_files/1stpersons.htm
 
.
lol. No I doubt the mammoths killed them. But what I gather from your posts is that you're saying that European americans have somehow more right than the native americans on the American continent, all based on a obscure link to an early human ancestor. A bit like neaderthals lol.
And lets not forget it was likely that the cro magnon that migrated into the American continent were their mongoloid cousins who went east to asia, instead of their counterparts who went west? since the land bridge existed on the Asian continent.

No obscure link,many archelogical findings proove my point,pls just search.If i were the american goverment i would abolish all the extra rights that the so called natives have right now as clearly they are not the natives.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom