Hyde
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,543
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Vulgar comments
Mr President,
Lay off!
Post reported - no need to reply guyz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vulgar comments
please also tell it profit india more than faisal shehzad.
BTW... this is not the only Muslim majority state which was invaded by indina army.
Thousands of Muslims were killed indiscriminately when India invaded Hyderabad and continued the genocide to reduce Muslim population.
In Kashmir Indian army applied same formulae as they applied in Hyderabad but Kashmiri resistance became internationalized as a result of indo-pak wars for obvious reasons of border issues.
Hyderabad was never Muslim majority...the Nizam's territory had more than 80% Hindus.It was just the opposite of Kashmir, a Muslim ruler and majority Hindu subjects like how Kashmir had a Hindu ruler and majority Muslim subjects.
That is why both India and Pakistan are hypocrites..when it suited India the people's voice was treated as greater than the ruler's(ex Hyderabad) and when convenient the ruler's word was treated greater than the people's voice(Kashmir). Similarly Pakistanis wanted to hear the Nizam in Hyderabad but did not want to listen to the Maharaja in Kashmir.In the end India being stronger managed to hold on to both territories.
Morality means nothing in this world and never has.
Hyderabad was never Muslim majority...the Nizam's territory had more than 80% Hindus.It was just the opposite of Kashmir, a Muslim ruler and majority Hindu subjects like how Kashmir had a Hindu ruler and majority Muslim subjects.
That is why both India and Pakistan are hypocrites..when it suited India the people's voice was treated as greater than the ruler's(ex Hyderabad) and when convenient the ruler's word was treated greater than the people's voice(Kashmir). Similarly Pakistanis wanted to hear the Nizam in Hyderabad but did not want to listen to the Maharaja in Kashmir.In the end India being stronger managed to hold on to both territories.
Morality means nothing in this world and never has.
Can you show us some NEUTRAL links to show us that 2 million Kashmiri people have been killed???
2 million? Wow. Can I have some of what you're smoking bro? Please?
Hyderabad was never Muslim majority...the Nizam's territory had more than 80% Hindus.It was just the opposite of Kashmir, a Muslim ruler and majority Hindu subjects like how Kashmir had a Hindu ruler and majority Muslim subjects.
That is why both India and Pakistan are hypocrites..when it suited India the people's voice was treated as greater than the ruler's(ex Hyderabad) and when convenient the ruler's word was treated greater than the people's voice(Kashmir). Similarly Pakistanis wanted to hear the Nizam in Hyderabad but did not want to listen to the Maharaja in Kashmir.In the end India being stronger managed to hold on to both territories.
Morality means nothing in this world and never has.
New Recruit
I think he is including kashmiri pandits who were killed by the so called freedom fighters aka terrorists in his data.
India never occupied Hyderabad on the pretext of religion. It was always for strategic reasons. Pakistan brings religion in every occupation. India doesn't. For India, it is always strategic, just like the US didn't let the south secede from the union.
Oh..Pakistan and India want Kashmir for the greatest strategic reason of them all...water.
but it was decided that areas which are surrounded by indian union will become indias. thats why junagadh and hyderabad became indias
Yes. The only difference is Pakistan drops in the shadow of religion to do it while India does not. That argument is moot anyway, because their existence is in question because of their actions.