If Agencies will have different definition of Terrorist or Terrorism than it is double standard don't you think ..
No, it is the difference between theory and practise. How academics define and practioners act.
I certainly don't mean all of Europe neither US .. there are millions of Good people in both Continents .. i just highlighted the role of Canada with a little bit of opposite of Role US and EU .. plus when i talk to American as a Muslim from Pakistan i see their knowledge is either wrong or media based which is prime cause of their hate towards islam and Muslims but with Canadian i realize that, even they don't have much information but yet they did not have hate in their hearts like EU and American ( of course a certain people i am talking about not all ) .
Then the use of 'Rascist Europe and US' was inappropriate. I'll give you the benefit of doubt, assume it was unintended and leave it at that.
I wasn't specifically talking about Media , but western people in General those who tends to blame ISlam and Muslims for all ills the West is facing today .. neglecting the fact half of the problems is that their own govt put on their heads ..
Things is first it was just media but now a huge amount of people actually eats the media Narrative which i was mocking there ..
And how would this be differen from non-western people in general who blame the west/us/jews for all ills their world is facing today, neglecting the fact half of the problem is that their own governments and politicians (and possibly clerics) put on their heads? Are non-western media any better? I doubt it.
You did realize that the people i put in example dead long before the word terrorism attached to Muslims only .. Gandi died in 1947 or 48 ? and bhagat singh even before , and we experience this If he is a Muslims than a Terrorist trend which take hold recently ..
The terms 'terrorism' and 'terrorist' are old. See eg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism#Terminology
The definition of terrorism has proven controversial. These difficulties arise from the fact that the term "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged. Depending on how broadly the term is defined, the roots and practice of terrorism can be traced at least to the 1st-century AD.
"Terrorism" comes from the French word
terrorisme, and originally referred specifically to
state terrorism as practiced by the French government during the 1793–1794
Reign of Terror.
Although "terrorism" originally referred to acts committed by a government, currently it usually refers to the killing of innocent people for political purposes in such a way as to create a spectacle. This meaning can be traced back to
Sergey Nechayev, who described himself as a "terrorist". Nechayev founded the Russian terrorist group "People's Retribution" (Народная расправа) in 1869.
The lack of consensus as to what a terrorist is can affect policies designed to deal with terrorists. Some view them as soldiers that can be held at the end of a war and are entitled to various privileges spelled out in the Geneva Conventions. Others view them as criminals that should be tried in civil courts. Still others will argue that terrorists are best treated as a category to themselves and need policies tailored to them.
[note: actually not a bad substantive discussion in this wiki page]
lets not go off topic here and discuss the incident and we are not off topic than we can continue in a Formal way
I think we can safely conclude neither of us approves of this particular act of terror.[/QUOTE]
Are you white? You're definitely white. Have you ever said "what if" on PDF when the article was about a Muslim terrorist? I highly doubt it. You just proved that whites have double standards.
How come they didn't say his religion? He must be Christian? So how come they can call him a terrorist but not specify that he's a Christian Terrorist? Stupid West and their Double Standards!
May this sub-human scum Alexandre Bissonnette burn in hell for eternity with the rest of his f***ing sub-human racist brethren scum!
According to you, skin color determines standards and opinions? Are you yellow?
after the americans..the canadians must be the most fcuked up people in the american continents and this white monkey terrorist just proved it true
Violent hate crime: Countries Compared
http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Fear-of-crime/Violent-hate-crime
Rank 1= most/worst. Rank 132=least/besty
Mexico ranks 110. Canada ranks 94. India ranks 77. Netherlands ranks 65. USA ranks 45. Pakistan ranks 17.
