What's new

‘Quality, capacity, safety of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons better than India’s’

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
‘Quality, capacity, safety of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons better than India’s’
IKRAM JUNAIDI — UPDATED 26 minutes ago
WHATSAPP
1 COMMENT
PRINT
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s nuclear programme was launched for peaceful purposes but national security issues forced the country to build nuclear weapons, former nuclear scientist and the chairman of the Underground Gasification Project at the Thar Coal Field, Dr Samar Mubarakmand, said on Tuesday.

Dr Mubarakmand was speaking at a seminar titled ‘Civilian Uses for Nuclear Energy in Pakistan: Opportunities and Prospects’, organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI).

Although the seminar was supposed to focus on nuclear energy, the discussion revolved mostly around nuclear weapons and nuclear material.

Dr Mubarakmand said Pakistan’s nuclear programme was always peaceful, and there have been various peaceful applications of nuclear technology such as the establishment of several nuclear medical centres, agricultural research centres and the radioactive tracers used by the Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) to build the Mangi Dam in Balochistan.

Because Pakistan is not a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, he said it was impossible for the country to receive simple technology, and this was possible because of Pakistani scientists who despite heavy sanctions made Pakistan a nuclear state.

“The relaxation of bans by members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) with respect to India as a special dispensation in 2008 under US lobbying, and the current efforts to make India a member of the NSG is an example of the biased Western psyche and mindset,” he claimed.

Defending Pakistan against allegations of helping Iran and Libya build nuclear weapons, he said both those countries remain non-nuclear states.

“The world can see that Pakistan’s civilian nuclear programme is not being used for military purposes. No theft of nuclear material has ever taken place in Pakistan. We need to survive in the subcontinent with dignity and, being a smaller state, Pakistan restored the balance of power by conducting nuclear tests after India,” he said.

Strategic Vision Institute Executive Director Prof Zafar Iqbal Cheema said the treatment given to India by the West is evidence that politics prevails over rules.

“India was trying to make nuclear weapons since 1959, but India is considered a country with a good track record and Pakistan is considered a country that cannot be trusted. However, it is a fact that the quality, capacity and safety of Pakistani nuclear weapons are better compared to India’s,” he claimed.

Prof Cheema endorsed a statement by the Senate chairman, where he claimed that Pakistan was denied nuclear energy because it is a Muslim country.

National Defence University assistant professor Dr Rizwana Karim Abbasi, however, did speak about nuclear energy. She said the demand has increased since the 1990s, and nuclear energy could fill the demand for energy.

“Greenhouse gases have to be cut by 70pc by 2050 so the world will definitely move towards nuclear energy, which is cheaper and environment-friendly. China is producing 19,000MW of electricity through nuclear energy. India and 31 other countries are also going for it,” she said.

“Although incidents of atomic reactor accidents in Germany and Japan have led to resistance to nuclear energy in the West, it is still believed that nuclear energy should be used,” she added.

Dr Abbasi said fossil fuels increase environmental pollution so the world needs to depend more on nuclear power, and safety standards have to be improved.

“Pakistan needs to secure its membership in the NSG, and it should make more nuclear power plants to make more energy,” she said. The former chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Dr Pervez Butt, said Pakistan has been considering producing 8,835MW electricity through nuclear energy by 2030, which will meet 5 to 8pc of the total requirement.

Published in Dawn, December 28th, 2016


WHATSAPP
1 COMMENT
PRINT
 
.
Dr. Mubarak was also involved with successful cruise missile program Babur. He has stated that making an ICBM range ballistic missile is totally within the reach of Pakistan's military-nuclear industrial set up with its current capabilities, knowledge-base, and resources.

I don't know how many of these things are meant to be taken seriously though
 
.
Dr. Mubarak was also involved with successful cruise missile program Babur. He has stated that making an ICBM range ballistic missile is totally within the reach of Pakistan's military-nuclear industrial set up with its current capabilities, knowledge-base, and resources.

I don't know how many of these things are meant to be taken seriously though

He is not a politicians but a scientist so you should take his words seriously. All he said is about the capability which no doubt Pakistan has and I guess when he says that at least the enemies of Pakistan take his words very seriously. Developing a > 5500 km is not very difficult for an industrial complex that can produce a 2750 km range missile on a routine basis since the fundamentals are the same, the only differences are sizing and no of stages, a bit higher speeds and higher re-entry temperatures.
 
.
Pakistan’s nuclear programme was launched for peaceful purposes but national security issues forced the country to build nuclear weapons,

Although the seminar was supposed to focus on nuclear energy, the discussion revolved mostly around nuclear weapons and nuclear material.
This just goes to show how committed they are to used Nuke tech for Civil purposes
 
. .
Says Zafar Iqbal cheema, like anybody cares.

Everybody cares when see the miserable safety record of Indian Nuclear plants...Here are a few

http://articles.economictimes.india...ng-kakrapar-atomic-power-station-plant-worker

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/we-may-never-know-what-caused-barc-fire-govt-408153

And the worst of all is suspecting an maniac insider who plays around with nuclear stuff...

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/radiation-poisoning-at-kaiga-plant-insider-hand-suspected-405803

And here is just the tip of the iceberg

https://www.dianuke.org/accidents-at-nuclear-power-plants-in-india/

So yeah world do care when see such things and that is why your last attempt to get NSG membership faced NO from many countries other than China.
 
Last edited:
.
Says Zafar Iqbal cheema, like anybody cares.

Wrong.

Says Dr Samar Mubarakmand--who has never been wrong since now.

He commanded Pakistan's Babur program and stated that india's effort to build similar cruise missile will fail due to lack of structural capability required to carry out such program.

indians back then laughed at him and made fun of him (as usual, inferior peoples' (hindus) reaction towards superior peoples (Muslims) who previously ruled them for 1000 years).

Guess what? nirbhay--indian effort to build a cruise missile similar to Babur--failed one, then again, and again, and then AGAIN!!! and then government was thinking of scrapping the program.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

So Dr Mubarak is your god. Worship him. He is the avatar of Vishnu and Shiva combined.:azn::azn:
 
.
This just goes to show how committed they are to used Nuke tech for Civil purposes

The news report picked up on one topic from the forum and reported it. I guess you weren't able to deduce that.
 
.
Says Zafar Iqbal cheema, like anybody cares.


It doesn't matter what anyone thinks. Least of all our eternal enemies. But what he says is the truth and is reality. And that's all that matters.

He is giving the rational of why a nation that is committed to the destruction of Pakistan is unable to destroy us. Even though they are more than 7x bigger than us and have abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege. NO other nation in the ENTIRE HISTORY of MANKIND has managed to achieve this feat.
 
Last edited:
.
Wrong.

Says Dr Samar Mubarakmand--who has never been wrong since now.

He commanded Pakistan's Babur program and stated that india's effort to build similar cruise missile will fail due to lack of structural capability required to carry out such program.

indians back then laughed at him and made fun of him (as usual, inferior peoples' (hindus) reaction towards superior peoples (Muslims) who previously ruled them for 1000 years).

Guess what? nirbhay--indian effort to build a cruise missile similar to Babur--failed one, then again, and again, and then AGAIN!!! and then government was thinking of scrapping the program.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

So Dr Mubarak is your god. Worship him. He is the avatar of Vishnu and Shiva combined.:azn::azn:
No need to bring religion in to debate.
 
Last edited:
.
Wrong.

Says Dr Samar Mubarakmand--who has never been wrong since now.

He commanded Pakistan's Babur program and stated that india's effort to build similar cruise missile will fail due to lack of structural capability required to carry out such program.

indians back then laughed at him and made fun of him (as usual, inferior peoples' (hindus) reaction towards superior peoples (Muslims) who previously ruled them for 1000 years).

Guess what? nirbhay--indian effort to build a cruise missile similar to Babur--failed one, then again, and again, and then AGAIN!!! and then government was thinking of scrapping the program.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

So Dr Mubarak is your god. Worship him. He is the avatar of Vishnu and Shiva combined.:azn::azn:



Back before May 1998, indians use to laugh and severely ridicule Dr Samar Mubarakmand when he said that Pakistan had a nuclear weapons capability. indians claimed that it was IMPOSSIBLE for Pakistan to EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance. indians gave a million reasons as to why this was impossible. Some of which is uncannily similar to what indians NOW on PDF say with regards to Pakistsn's current military and economic development programs.
 
.
‘Quality, capacity, safety of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons better than India’s’
IKRAM JUNAIDI — UPDATED 26 minutes ago
WHATSAPP
1 COMMENT
PRINT
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s nuclear programme was launched for peaceful purposes but national security issues forced the country to build nuclear weapons, former nuclear scientist and the chairman of the Underground Gasification Project at the Thar Coal Field, Dr Samar Mubarakmand, said on Tuesday.

Dr Mubarakmand was speaking at a seminar titled ‘Civilian Uses for Nuclear Energy in Pakistan: Opportunities and Prospects’, organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI).

Although the seminar was supposed to focus on nuclear energy, the discussion revolved mostly around nuclear weapons and nuclear material.

Dr Mubarakmand said Pakistan’s nuclear programme was always peaceful, and there have been various peaceful applications of nuclear technology such as the establishment of several nuclear medical centres, agricultural research centres and the radioactive tracers used by the Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) to build the Mangi Dam in Balochistan.

Because Pakistan is not a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, he said it was impossible for the country to receive simple technology, and this was possible because of Pakistani scientists who despite heavy sanctions made Pakistan a nuclear state.

“The relaxation of bans by members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) with respect to India as a special dispensation in 2008 under US lobbying, and the current efforts to make India a member of the NSG is an example of the biased Western psyche and mindset,” he claimed.

Defending Pakistan against allegations of helping Iran and Libya build nuclear weapons, he said both those countries remain non-nuclear states.

“The world can see that Pakistan’s civilian nuclear programme is not being used for military purposes. No theft of nuclear material has ever taken place in Pakistan. We need to survive in the subcontinent with dignity and, being a smaller state, Pakistan restored the balance of power by conducting nuclear tests after India,” he said.

Strategic Vision Institute Executive Director Prof Zafar Iqbal Cheema said the treatment given to India by the West is evidence that politics prevails over rules.

“India was trying to make nuclear weapons since 1959, but India is considered a country with a good track record and Pakistan is considered a country that cannot be trusted. However, it is a fact that the quality, capacity and safety of Pakistani nuclear weapons are better compared to India’s,” he claimed.

Prof Cheema endorsed a statement by the Senate chairman, where he claimed that Pakistan was denied nuclear energy because it is a Muslim country.

National Defence University assistant professor Dr Rizwana Karim Abbasi, however, did speak about nuclear energy. She said the demand has increased since the 1990s, and nuclear energy could fill the demand for energy.

“Greenhouse gases have to be cut by 70pc by 2050 so the world will definitely move towards nuclear energy, which is cheaper and environment-friendly. China is producing 19,000MW of electricity through nuclear energy. India and 31 other countries are also going for it,” she said.

“Although incidents of atomic reactor accidents in Germany and Japan have led to resistance to nuclear energy in the West, it is still believed that nuclear energy should be used,” she added.

Dr Abbasi said fossil fuels increase environmental pollution so the world needs to depend more on nuclear power, and safety standards have to be improved.

“Pakistan needs to secure its membership in the NSG, and it should make more nuclear power plants to make more energy,” she said. The former chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Dr Pervez Butt, said Pakistan has been considering producing 8,835MW electricity through nuclear energy by 2030, which will meet 5 to 8pc of the total requirement.

Published in Dawn, December 28th, 2016


WHATSAPP
1 COMMENT
PRINT

From title itslef , I could guess who would have written the article. Congratulations to pakistan for better Nuclear nuclear weapo.
 
.
From title itslef , I could guess who would have written the article. Congratulations to pakistan for better Nuclear nuclear weapo.


This IS a Pakistani forum not a forum for the interests of our eternal enemies. We believe and trust our own. If you don't like it you are more than welcome to leave.
 
.
We need access to uranium... We have china which builds safest nuclear power plants recent deal with UK was reflection of that... Now, why can't we make deal with Australia for bucks for uranium??
 
.
The news report picked up on one topic from the forum and reported it. I guess you weren't able to deduce that.
Very well then I suppose these lines from the OP seem to support your line of thinking:-
Although the seminar was supposed to focus on nuclear energy, the discussion revolved mostly around nuclear weapons and nuclear material.

And such ignorant I was that I was expecting some kind of talk regarding Thorium tech or hybrid MoX fuel reactors. Even basic discussion regarding different kind of reactor vessel geometry and type with different fuel cycles and possible effects in steam generation for power production. If all this was not palatable by the audience even basic talk regarding uses of ionizing radiation in treating harvested crops would have found takers. But discussing weapons certainly dose not come "Civil Use"
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom