Sina-1
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
- Messages
- 1,019
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
SO according to you your proof is that Iran would do a miserable job on an actual flying aircraft with a pilot inside but wouldn't do a miserable job on a freaking mockup!!!!!!!!! LOL!
For a POC it is not a miserable job. Quite to the contrary. It is good enough to verify certain technological enablers such as the unconventional configuration and how the aircraft behaves close to the ground.
FYI slapping on a few real equipment sitting in a storage somewhere is by far easier than trying to build a fake version of them!!!!!!!!! MY GOD!
You are deluded. It would have been easier for them just put in a couple more lcd-screens. The analog speed indicator is a big give away that this is a flying POC. Otherwise even idiots in this forum know that those indicators do not belong in a real mockup of a 5th gen fighter.
SO IT DOES NOT make it anymore than a mockup!
Wrong! If this is your idea of a mockup then I feel sorry for you. If this is your idea of what Iran could muster then AGAIN I feel sorry for you. Seniors in a tech uni would do a better job producing mockup.
Iranian engineers are NOT IDIOT's and they WOULD NOT build a canopy like that on a design that hasn't even been proven yet and expect a real trained test pilot to jump inside. It's absurd!
Go read a book about aircraft design. Understand the notion of a POC and then come back and take forum space.
This is the working prototype/prof of concept.... And even that is relatively small
As I said, go read a book. Prototype /= POC! Different uses, different phases in product development.