mohsen
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 6,710
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
http://mod.gov.ir/news/با-حضور-رئيس...ول-آوت-از-نخستين-هواپيماي-جت-آموزشي-بومي-كشوراین عکس رو از کجا آوردی ؟
کدوم سایت ؟
کیفیتش بالاست
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://mod.gov.ir/news/با-حضور-رئيس...ول-آوت-از-نخستين-هواپيماي-جت-آموزشي-بومي-كشوراین عکس رو از کجا آوردی ؟
کدوم سایت ؟
کیفیتش بالاست
You dont even know what u are claiming, just arguing.
And I showed that even subsonic airliner has more thin wing profile and edge flaps, something that that thing.
When I say thick I mean thick profile. Obviously thickness is relative thing. Here subsonic, transonic and supersonic wing profiles:
View attachment 391049
All modern transonic and supersonic aircraft have edge flappers which allow wing to adapt to different speeds.
Yes,boeing designed,built and flew an aircraft called the Bird of prey which used very similar canted wingsCan an aircrft fly with such wings?
Do your research young fellow and all will be revealed.......Persian/Azeris are smarter innately than Gangadeshis PERIOD!Source?
Stop pulling facts outta ur arse.
Actually they,re not! Some guy on PDF does.
For supersonic inlet u need either inlet ramp/cone or slot:Yes it's called arguing with fact and sources. You should learn it instead of blowing hot air out of your butt.
Please enlighten me and everyone else on what I don't know.
You claimed that there was no "inlet diverters" on the F-313, I corrected you to inform you that no such thing exists then I proceeded to educate you by listing methods of controlling airflow.
Here it is for everyone to see.
Inlet ramp
Inlet cone
DSI
S-duct
If you dont like term "edge flaps", call them "leading edge slats". What does it change? Qaher has none anyway. Unlike all modern transonic and supersonic aircraft.At this point you are either high on hard drugs or just helplessly challenged or a troll. It's very possible you are all three.
According to 500, this airliner's wing is "more thin" then the F-313.
View attachment 391066
The only thing here that is thick is your skull.
You accuse me of not knowing what I'm talking about but talk about something that doesn't exist. There is no such thing as "edge flappers". Just like there is no such thing as "inlet diverters"
I'm only going to assume you mean leading edge slats.
View attachment 391067
View attachment 391068
For supersonic inlet u need either inlet ramp/cone or slot:
If you dont like term "edge flaps", call them "leading edge slats". What does it change? Qaher has none anyway. Unlike all modern transonic and supersonic aircraft.
@500 I'm not an aviation expert but won't you think the flaps on the front wings can help the airplane to adept to different speed by modifying how the air move around the back wing and as you see the front wing is not that thickAll modern transonic and supersonic aircraft have edge flappers which allow wing to adapt to different speeds.
Boeing 787 has them.
Boeing X-32 has them.
All modern fighters and jet airliners have them.
Qaher does not have them.
هر عکسی رو که میخای کیفیت های مختلفش یا مشابهات رو بدست بیاری اینجوری کن گوگل برات میاره :این عکس رو از کجا آوردی ؟
کدوم سایت ؟
کیفیتش بالاست
LOL, cant u see slots between the fuselage and intakes?You did not even know what any of those were until yesterday when I gave you an education lesson.
Does the Rafale have any of those to achieve supersonic flight? The F-313 like the rafale has a very similar engine to intake spacing meaning it should also have an S-duct.
Well it was posed as fighter. If u call it a bomber, its too small to carry something internally and range is too small as well. Its some technology demonstrator at most. Like Bird of Prey.also I still wonder why this airplane must be a supersonic airplane if its designed to be able to do stealthy strike at the very low altitude against enemy target
let ask you a question if you plan for a mission to strike a target which one is preferable
1 - sneak under radar let say between 30-50m with a stealth airplane at for example 700km for 1000km
2 - fly with F-15 at 13km of altitude with a speed of 850km for 1000km
which one you think have more chance o success ?
don't forget aside from f-22 no other airplane can do super-cruise with full load
LOL, cant u see slots between the fuselage and intakes?
You dont even understand what u are talking.
Well it was posed as fighter. If u call it a bomber, its too small to carry something internally and range is too small as well. Its some technology demonstrator at most. Like Bird of Prey.