Geromix
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 0
The real terrorist is India.
A very mature reply that explains everything.Thanks,i suppose one can expect only more of these wonderful answers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The real terrorist is India.
A very mature reply that explains everything.Thanks,i suppose one can expect only more of these wonderful answers.
A very mature reply that explains everything.Thanks,i suppose one can expect only more of these wonderful answers.
New Recruit
Since you are in Clifton, Karachi, can you tell us if Dawood Ibrahim is there?. It is rumored that he is in a posh building in Clifton.
Just to point out that IMO some in the Pakistan media are less morally bankrupt that the Indian media. As an example I am copying below an article published in today's Dawn. Do you have any one in India who can dare to write such blatant criticism of his own country?
Facing the truth
By Irfan Husain
Even in my remote bit of paradise, news of distant disasters filters through: above the steady sound of waves breaking on the sandy beach in Sri Lanka, I was informed by several news channels about the sickening attacks on Mumbai. My Internet connection is erratic and slow, but nevertheless, I have been bombarded with emails, asking me for my take on this latest atrocity.
Over the last few years, I have travelled to several countries across four continents. Everywhere I go, I am asked why Pakistan is now the focal point of Islamic extremism and terrorism, and why successive governments have allowed this cancer to fester and grow. As a Pakistani, it is obviously embarrassing to be put on the spot, but I can see why people everywhere are concerned. In virtually every Islamic terrorist plot, whether it is successful or not, there is a Pakistani angle. Often, foreign terrorists have trained at camps in the tribal areas; others have been brainwashed in madressahs; and many more have been radicalised by the poisonous teachings of so-called religious leaders.
Madeline Albright, the ex-US secretary of state, has called Pakistan an international migraine, saying it was a cause for global concern as it had nuclear weapons, terrorism, religious extremists, corruption, extreme poverty, and was located in a very important part of the world. While none of this makes pleasant reading for a Pakistani, Ms Albrights summation is hard to refute. Often, the truth is painful, but most Pakistanis refuse to see it. Instead of confronting reality, we are in a permanent state of denial. This ostrich-like posture has made things even worse.
Most Pakistanis, when presented with the fact that our country is now the breeding ground for the most violent ideologies, and the most vicious gangs of thugs who kill in the name of religion, go back in history to explain and justify their presence in our country. They refer to the Afghan war, and the creation of an army of holy warriors to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Then they go on to complain that the Americans quit the region soon after the Soviets did, leaving us saddled with the problem of jihadi fighters from all over the Muslim world camped on our soil.
What we conveniently forget is that for most of the last two decades, the army and the ISI used these very jihadis to further their agenda in Kashmir and Afghanistan. This long official link has given various terror groups legitimacy and a domestic base that has now come to haunt us. Another aspect to this problem is the support these extremists enjoy among conservative Pakistani and Arab donors. Claiming they are fighting for Islamic causes, they attract significant amounts from Muslim businessmen here and abroad. And almost certainly, they also benefited from official Saudi largesse until 9/11.
Now that government policy is to distance itself from these jihadis, we find that many retired army officers have continued to train them in camps being run in many parts of Pakistan. A few weeks ago, Sheikh Rashid Ahmed, a prominent (and very loud) minister under both Nawaz Sharif and Musharraf, openly boasted on TV of running a camp for Kashmiri fighters on his own land just outside Rawalpindi a few years ago. If such camps can be set up a few miles from army headquarters, whats to stop them from operating in remote areas?
Many foreign and local journalists have exposed aspects of the terror network that has long flourished in Pakistan. Names, dates and addresses have been published and broadcast. But each allegation has been met with a brazen denial from every level of officialdom. Just as we denied the existence of our nuclear weapons programme for years, so too do we refuse to accept the presence of extremist terrorists.
For years, it suited the army and the ISI to secretly harbour and support these groups in Pakistan, Kashmir and Afghanistan. While officially denying that they had anything to do with these jihadis, money and arms from secret sources would reach them regularly. Despite our spooks maintaining plausible deniability, enough information about this covert support for jihadis has emerged for the fig-leaf to slip. And even if the intelligence community has now cut its links with these terrorists, the genie is out of the bottle.
Each time an atrocity like Mumbai occurs, and Pakistan is accused of being involved, the defensive mantra chanted by the chorus of official spokesmen is: Show us the proof. The reality is that in terrorist operations planned in secret, there is not much of a paper trail left behind. Nine times out of ten, the perpetrators do not survive to give evidence before a court. But in this case, one terrorist did survive, and Ajmal Amir Kamals story points to Lashkar-e-Tayyaba. The sophistication of the attack is testimony to careful planning and rigorous training.
This was no hit-and-run operation, but was intended to cause the maximum loss of life.
Pakistans foreign minister said that Pakistan, too, is a victim of terrorism. While this is certainly true, the rest of the world wants to know whey we arent doing more to root out the training camps, and lock up those involved. Given the vast un-audited amounts from the exchequer sundry intelligence agencies lay claim to, their failure to be more effective against internal terrorism is either a sign of incompetence, or of criminal collusion. Benazir Bhuttos murder, after an earlier attempt and many warnings, is a reminder of how poorly we are served by our intelligence agencies.
And while the diplomatic fallout from the Mumbai attack spreads and threatens to escalate into an armed confrontation, the biggest winners are those who carried out the butchery of so many innocent people. It is to their advantage to prevent India and Pakistan from coordinating their fight against terrorism. Tension between the two neighbours suits them, while peace and cooperation threatens their very existence.
The world is naturally concerned about the danger posed by these terror groups to other countries. However, the biggest threat they pose is to Pakistan itself. Until Pakistanis grasp this brutal reality and muster up the resolve necessary to crush them, these killers will tear the country apart.
DAWN - Irfan Hussain; December 03, 2008
In my opinion yes i think it could be a Pakistan based non-state group that organised these attacks, but the politicians in India seem keen to pass the buck to the ISI (on every ocassion) in order to save their own necks.
I agree to the fact that whatever happened was bad and it is always going to be bad when innocent civilians die on either side of the border or anywhere else in the world. If it was only military targets or soldiers i would have probably thought otherwise, perhaps even lauded the feat.
Now the real question is...inspite of India repeatedly blaming the ISI for everything that happens on Indian soil, I would like to ask them what were the internal intelligence agencies doing in India? Sleeping? They are always goin on bout ISI and ISI, well if that is the case, then India which calls itself or portrays itself as a superpower should by now be well equipped and informed to deal with the ISI and it ploys. Why is it still so obsolete in this regard?
If the ISI is really so darn good, then I think we are better then both the CIA and the Mosad based on the level of competence the boys in ISI have shown in accomplishing their missions since their creation. Actually I propose a new thread in this regard as to who has the worlds best ranking intelligence agency?
I think India should understand that the only way India can become a great power or even a super power, is by having Pakistan as a friend and not a foe.
A strong and constructive Pakistan will only complement India's growth. But if Pakistan is hurting or being sidelined or ill-treated it will only add to India's woes and misery. It is not in Indian interest to compete with Pakistan as Pakistan has proven time and time again, its resourcefulness and resilience with limited resources. That should teach you a lesson. The people of Pakistan are like Germans and Japs, who have the capability to creat something out of nothing! Look at the country's history and how it came into existance!
This attack just re-iterates how India is still a third world country, as it highlighted a depleted police force, bad intelligence, corrupt politicians and lack of infrastructure to protect its populace. On the one hand they are working on sending people to the moon and on the other hand they are revealing how the coppers are still armed with 303s.
All i have to say is India look into your own collar and your own intel lapses before pointing the fingers at others.
This is an opportunity for India to join hands with Pakistan and genuinely work towards stamping out terrorists outfits. If it misses this opportunity then it will have only itself to blame. Work with us and the benifits will be much better for you then you working against us. You have a lot more to lose economically if you go to war with Pakistan and with nukes only a buttons press away, beating the war drums does not serve anybodys interest.
As for the warmongers and hawks in the cabinet, they need to understand that Pakistan may be weak quantatively to Indian strength, but qualitatively the Pakistan army and its people in general are far superior and stronger. The truth is India does not have the power nor the will to attack Pakistan. Mark my words, India will do nothing about this, except make a lot of noise in the media and thats where it will all stop.
I have a creative tip for India. India should scrap its armed forces and intelligence agencies and outsource all its defense and intelligence services to Pakistan!!!
The entire episode was arranged to have the man, who exposed the dirty hands of the Hindu terrorists, murdered, I believe his name starts with the letter "K". His wife has refused compensation from the Indian government for she knows who murdered her husband and why.