What's new

Punjabiat Zindabad

If language is a unification tool; i rather vouch for a local language; in our case Urdu, than a foreign language.
Urdu is not a 'local language', prior to 1947, hardly anyone spoke Urdu. Even Farsi was by far, significantly more wide-spread (within modern-day Pakistan) despite British attempts to suppress it.
 
.
Urdu is not a 'local language', prior to 1947, hardly anyone spoke Urdu. Even Farsi was by far, significantly more wide-spread (within modern-day Pakistan) despite British attempts to suppress it.

What i meant by local is that a big chunk of Pakistanis speak it; i.e. native urdu speakers. And even despite that; Quaid said it, so it's an Amen for us.
 
.
ppp.jpg
 
. . . . . . .
We don't.
Many of the Urdu Speakers were not originally Urdu Speakers like Gujratis, Memons etc

Then you shouldn't have to create an artificial identity for yourselves. Gujrati culture isn't any worse than Sindhi or Punjabi culture.

We don't.
Many of the Urdu Speakers were not originally Urdu Speakers like Gujratis, Memons etc
Many Gujratis and Rajasthanis living in Sindh from pre-partition era proudly speak their language and don't act like their newcomer wannabe fellows.
 
. . . .
Yes, we will send some sugar mills as sweetener too :D

Sugar is just a fassad. Its affects on the brain are similar to that of Cocaine. It should be banned for greater public health.

But seriously how many people in Pakistan does BBC think, can write or read Sanskrit script?
 
.
Sugar is just a fassad. Its affects on the brain are similar to that of Cocaine. It should be banned for greater public health.

But seriously how many people in Pakistan does BBC think, can write or read Sanskrit script?

BBC are not a very bright bunch of people (dont let the accents, poshness, snottiness fool you)....and they are about to get shellacked by British govt (removal of mandatory TV license on brit public)...so serves them right.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom