Pulwama - From Bluster to a Whimper

[Maarkhoor]

@Hodor

@Bilal Khan 777
Sir this guy claims to know each and everything....

Can you visit this thread and tell us either he or she is correct or just bullshitting it here and there and calling names at senior persons.
@Rashid Mahmood @Tps43 @Khafee

 

[Talon]

Yaar ye kon samjhai inko.

Source to aisay mangtay hein jaisay sab kuch internet pe hota hai.

exactly...100% agreed

 

[GumNaam]

Yaar ye kon samjhai inko.

Source to aisay mangtay hein jaisay sab kuch internet pe hota hai.

Well you can't blame them. It's your unsubstantiated word against a video that you call fake and the word of ISPR. Of course no one would take your word seriously unless you provide an authentic, verifiable source, I mean...DUH! I guess the best STILL came from the ISPR to the indians when they were disputing JFT verses F16...pick any aircraft, doesn't change the fact that the iaf got humiliated!

 

[Talon]

@Hodor

@Bilal Khan 777
Sir this guy claims to know each and everything....

Can you visit this thread and tell us either he or she is correct or just bullshitting it here and there and calling names at senior persons.
@Rashid Mahmood @Tps43 @Khafee

dude when did I claim to know everything?

And mind telling me when did I call names to senior members?

Not forgetting you abused me extensively last time we had an argument.

Just be honourable.

 

[Signalian]

On the other end of the PGB spectrum, Global Industrial and Defence Solutions (GIDS) is marketing what is known as the “Range Extension Kit” (REK). The REK is a refit for Mk80-series bombs, likely the 113kg Mk81, 227kg Mk82, and potentially 454kg Mk83. With the REK, GPBs – or “dumb bombs” – are converted into INS/GPS PGBs with a maximum range of 50-60km. Among the potential PGB options available to the PAF’s JF-17, the GIDS REK will be the most likely. However, the PAF could also have the added option of procuring an even longer range PGB kit in the form of the Denel Dynamics Umbani, which can be configured to travel in excess of 100km and up to 200km.

 

[airomerix]

Well you can't blame them. It's your unsubstantiated word against a video that you call fake and the word of ISPR. Of course no one would take your word seriously unless you provide an authentic, verifiable source, I mean...DUH! I guess the best STILL came from the ISPR to the indians when they were disputing JFT verses F16...pick any aircraft, doesn't change the fact that the iaf got humiliated!

I agree. But

I've been saying the following since 28th Feb

1) 29 Squadron was in action (People asked for sources)
2) No JF-17s got the kills (people asked for sources)
3) Wg Cmdr Nauman got the Bison kill
4) MANY MORE.

I post on this forum after having a word or two with the officers involved. I might reveal the entire story. But the crux is always there. And slowly it is coming out. This article is one such revelation.

 

[ziaulislam]

Nope it does not.

They just want to mask the aircraft used.

You guys want to award false kills to someone who was incompetent. Which is a greater sin?

It does..especially with help of guys like you..
Sin is a sin..a lie is a lie
PAF is suppose to be clear which aircraft shot which..or stay mum..

 

[Sugarcane]

Hindustan was lucky that bombs didn't hit seminary, other wise killing of children would have surely initiated full fledge war.

 

[untitled]

So the Su30 kill is a 'probable'

 

[maximuswarrior]

It is a joy to relive the special moments.

So the Su30 kill is a 'probable'

In your pathetic mind it might be.

 

[GumNaam]

I agree. But

I've been saying the following since 28th Feb

1) 29 Squadron was in action (People asked for sources)
2) No JF-17s got the kills (people asked for sources)
3) Wg Cmdr Nauman got the Bison kill
4) MANY MORE.

I post on this forum after having a word or two with the officers involved. I might reveal the entire story. But the crux is always there. And slowly it is coming out. This article is one such revelation.

Again, none of your claims have any verifiable sources. You are basically asking us to take your word for it cuz you supposedly appen to know sooner military officers. Come on yar, seriously?

 

[airomerix]

Again, none of your claims have any verifiable sources. You are basically asking us to take your word for it cuz you supposedly appen to know sooner military officers. Come on yar, seriously?

Nope don't take my word.

Take Kaiser Tufails. He confirmed all my claims in his one report.

 

[GumNaam]

Nope don't take my word.

Take Kaiser Tufails. He confirmed all my claims in his one report.

And who is Kaiser Tufail? A PDF member? Or a PAF officer?

 

[Falcon26]

The video of S/L Hassan standing with a JF-17 and airmen cheering is a staged one.

When ISPR announced no F-16s were used, the base cmdr asked the guys to leak out a video of JF-17 and S/L Hassan.

Why S/L Hassan? Because his photo was already leaked with two AD guys who sit on a hot plate for now.

What was the reason of staging?

 

[Ultima Thule]

What was the reason of staging?

According t @airomerix its was the marketing stunt @Falcon26