war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
That's a nice question right. I don't know that is why asked.@war&peace Why is the Gov issuing an NOC if it is not a legal requirement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a nice question right. I don't know that is why asked.@war&peace Why is the Gov issuing an NOC if it is not a legal requirement?
Ground realities are facts written in stone, those who ignore it do it at their own dellusional perli, this isnt france or britain where the baradari system no longer exists and majority is literate and politically aware, this is pakistan...There is a wrong way to do the right thing and then there is a right way to do the right thing.
Which do you think Allah tells you to do: the wrong way or the right way?
i disagree,the saudis help us financially and have been helping us through thick and thin while the iranians bomb our territory and sends indian spiesI have avoided this thread as it has three very swing points
1. PTI
2. Raheel Sharif
3. Saudia
Now lets move forward first sending Raheel Sharif never means Pakistan is going to war with Yemen. It is just Raheel going Not PA or PN or PAF going. Why this article focus on PTI remember the last vote for deploying troops to Yemen was heavily opposed by MNA in Noon league. When Pakistan needs to deploy troops to Yemen it will require either parliament vote or an order from the president and both of those things will not come in favour of Saudia so Noon came up with a plan of sending Raheel Sharif and PTI went against it because of just political reasons and nothing else. So sending Raheel will give Noon advantage over the Saudi love vote bank but the PTI's opposition will do the job for Noon any how as most of the Saudi love vote bank lies in KPK and Noon will gain advantage.
Now lets look at foreign policy and international relations prospective. Pakistan cannot send troops as that prospective will not go through parliament so Raheel deployment will do the job in improving relations with Saudia and GCC which are all time low and this move will not piss off Iran as it is only one general that is just going in for the command and control role but in prospect this is a big move as it means Pakistan will be supplying Saudia with advance military experience and strategy of Rasheel Sharif. Only time can tell the advantage and loss of this move for now.
Relations with Iran are more important than with Saudia. As Iran and Pakistan have common border and Iran being Pakistan's land hub to Europe is necessary for the further advance in trade and prosperity. Plus Iran is also very important for the security of Balochistan and the Baloch insurgency is a common problem for Pakistan and Iran.
Sir with due respect your agreement or disagreement is not important and nor is what Saudia thinks or GCC thinks to Pakistan the national security and prosperity is more important. The ties between Pakistan and Iran are stronger as you don't supply nuclear technology to every country until you are in some form of Alliance. In kashmir neither Iran nor Saudi soldiers gave their lives so this is not our war. China has helped Pakistan most with Kashmir. Saudi gave Pakistan funds to fuel war in Afghanistan against Russia and we did our job and provided logistics and assistance to Afghan freedom. Saudia gives us funds is not a donation to Pakistan. Pakistan provides them Many services in return like training their army and training their air force. Pakistan had major wars and who supported us? these things should be kept in mind. We cannot join the war in Saudia and Iran but we can negotiate peace and that is what we should do.i disagree,the saudis help us financially and have been helping us through thick and thin while the iranians bomb our territory and sends indian spies
what we need to do is openly declare our support for the arabs as iran has a defence pact with india and also harbour's their spies.
and so what if iran gets angry at us,we have nukes,what are they gonna do?
What is their main objection?
Relations with Iran are more important than with Saudia. As Iran and Pakistan have common border and Iran being Pakistan's land hub to Europe is necessary for the further advance in trade and prosperity. Plus Iran is also very important for the security of Balochistan and the Baloch insurgency is a common problem for Pakistan and Iran.
In my personal opinion Raheel Sharif should be allowed to lead Saudi forces but The Pti made the stance to make political gain in certain areas of southern Punjab and N league made the announcement to gain political advantage in KPK. This move will not hurt our relation with Iran and will improve our relation with Saudia but Pti is looking for personal gains here I would agree with you that Pti should back off on it's stance.Most of Pakistan remittances comes from GCC countries, not Iran. They support millions of Pakistanis and this can be increased in expense of workers from other countries like India if Pakistan play its card right. PTI should stop bringing sectarian angle to oppose N league. This has nothing to do with N vs PTI.
PTI should stick with local politics
Most of Pakistan remittances comes from GCC countries, not Iran. They support millions of Pakistanis and this can be increased in expense of workers from other countries like India if Pakistan play its card right. PTI should stop bringing sectarian angle to oppose N league. This has nothing to do with N vs PTI.
PTI should stick with local politics.
Correct...Increased Pakistani assistance to GCC security has resulted in hike in Pakistani visas this year while drastic reduction in visa quotas for Philipines and India..
Allah teaches us to use our minds, there is no right way in politics when u are fixing to win, right or wrong comes when u are actually in custody of the govt, for a good cause u have to deploy multi strategims go defeat enemies, holy prophet(pbuh) was a master tactician and an exemplary politician, we are his(pbuh)'s followers, his legacy..