Ah great now PTI wants to cash in on the dead bodies too, PML is to blame.... YES IT IS..... by PTI at this time of year, i don't think so. And btw Nawaz neither claims nor can claim the high moral standards that PTI claims of....
PML ministers are the junk of the junk.... PTI ones a tad bit better.... leaders.... both crapsters but Nawaz is making some smart moves i wish him luck.
You can not have a different yard-stick for comparing two parties. Either you compare them on same standards or you don't.
Strange logic you have there:
A is worst because actually A is bad but A claimed he was good. and B is good because B is actually worst but B never claimed he was good.
And all politicians make claims of high moral ground and Nawaz is not exception.
They want him to cancel it BECAUSE THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AND WE NEED ALL HANDS ON DECK..... is that too hard to comprehend....? visiting camps.... GREAT! i admire that but what would the IDPs think when they'd see him chanting slogans of change when they have their thirsty and hungry children....?
They would have felt less bad than what they felt when PM was doing his foreign tours.
It's his call and he has some sound advisers... i believe in them.... it's because of them that Russian is selling us gear, it's because of them that various banks are giving us "chanda" (as you'd call it, i call it arse saving money) it's because of him that many counties around the world have paid us visits in such short amount of time, it's because of him that projects for energy crisis have been initiated, it's because of him that our foreign reserves are rising and now stand at 14 billion dollars, it's because of him that 98=, it's because of him that we have an op against the terrorists, Chinese are giving us billions for the uplift of the region.....
All hail the glorious king attitude?
Relations with Russia started to warm up during Zardari era. So I don't think Nawaz alone can claim credit for that.
Any economist will tell you that if you increase foreign debt by 25%, foreign reserves are bound to go up by the same amount and local currency will get strengthened.
And now this $=98 thing is being presented as the biggest achievement of the century. If it is such an achievement then sending it to 108 should have been the worst economic management?
See the graph and see the time when the dollar went up, who was in government then?
My area is currently facing load-shedding, so we will talk if and when this government gets rid of load-shedding.
And about Chinese, well Pakistan's economic relations with China are hardly effected by who is in Islamabad.
And last I heard economic performance is measured by GDP growth rates, FDI and inflation. Since when increase in foreign debt became an indicator of economic growth?