[/QUOTE]
New Recruit
i would never be able to say it though, because it's not true. ex. people say there is a rape problem in india, why should i feel responsible when it's not india it's just bihar and UP? yes i am technically indian but i have zero connection to those parts of india... and that's how 'indian' loses its meaning. another example americans like indian food but why should i claim it when all they know is butter chicken and korma from punjab .
New Recruit
yes we do think differently. i want so much to compare india to european union, but even europeans are more similar to each other than indians, and they are a continent. the biggest divide in india is the dravidian/indo aryan languages, which have 100% separate histories and cultures and origins (european languages are similar). then you take the fact that europeans actually have a common religion, christianity, whereas indians have many religions with different heritages. also account for the fact that europeans are all one race, whereas indian race varies from indo aryan in north to mongoloid in NE and then dravidian mediteranean down south (haplogroups/charts/etc) and then an ASI component throughout
Of course, None of them should happen and nobody denies the fact but except few cases, it happens across the world. As much as you talk about Human rights, you forget that those acted on that are also "Humans". Lets take an example of US where a white cop shot Black teenager and then there were riots and arsoning. How would this stop when it is happening in a country where Human rights, Laws etc everything is strict. I am not defending but I am saying you are seeing the things out of perspective.
Why Priyanka, Aamir and Salman are expected to do so? Because they are celebrity? That doesn't make a sense. Who denies India doesn't have problem or as a fact of matter every country has its own problem but Celebrities are not the answers but Social servants are. This has been proved by recent noble prize.
Socialism can be solution so good democracy as well as Good dictatorship, It only depends only on the stakeholder the way they are behaving. I will see that thread but somehow I am missing your reason for argument. What do you want to convey, India has problems, yes there are lots of ! We agreed in starting. You want to be pessimistic, others wanted to be optimistic.
I know this mate , it was Nehru & his lust for power who rejected it, you will be amazed to learn that it was Qauid-e-Azam Md.Ali Jinnah & Mahatma Gandhi, who agreed to the cabinet mission plan , when Gandhi ji supported Md.Ali Jinnah in this, Nehru felt betrayed by Gandhi (note the role of Gandhi in negotiation with the British, diminished considerably after that , as Nehru made sure that Gandhi becomes symbolic rather then have a say in political matters in the real term) in fact the cabinet mission plan was the undisputed victory of both Qauid-e-Azam & Allama Iqbal , as the struggle from the beginning was to secure two large autonomous provinces within the framework of a federation , I think even Ayub Khan had also proposed a joint Indo-Pak defense agreement , in a federation with two autonomous province & Quaid e Azam Md.Ali Jinnah as its prime minister, the Quaid would almost certainly make sure that the arm forces had the maximum numbers of Muslims , & that would be the masterstroke with which, the power of running federal India would ultimately favour the Muslims , it was the best solution ,which power hungry Nehru & the ever deceitful British had to ruin it, & they did
