Promoting anti-science via textbooks - by PERVEZ HOODBHOY

[malik_qasim]

Wikipedia is not an authority on anything. Anyone can post anything. IT would be best if you stopped quoting the Quran, of which you have no knowledge of.

haha fine do not believe then
your loss

 

[Mrc]

clearly as you cannot put an effort to do your own research, I am posting the explanation of scientific theory as written in Wikipedia.

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed, preferably using a written, pre-defined, protocol of observations and experiments.[1][2]Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.[3]

It is important to note that the definition of a "scientific theory" (often ambiguously contracted to "theory" for the sake of brevity, including in this page) as used in the disciplines of science is significantly different from, and in contrast to, the common vernacular usage of the word "theory". As used in everyday non-scientific speech, "theory" implies that something is an unsubstantiated and speculative guess, conjecture, idea, or, hypothesis;[4] such a usage is the opposite of the word 'theory' in science.

clearly since you cannot think in terms of science and are stuck with an English word.. let me put is this way... Darwin's theory in clear violation of English grammer has no scientific proof behind it

 

[malik_qasim]

You are misquoting Quran where are the references for the Holy Quranic verses you mentioned? .....you are creating multiple ids so that you can spew all the false stuff here without harming your main id...and i suspect that you are a troll from across the border... and this id and dp both are fake.

You are misquoting Quran where are the references for the Holy Quranic verses you mentioned? .....you are creating multiple ids so that you can spew all the false stuff here without harming your main id...and i suspect that you are a troll from across the border... and this id and dp both are fake.

ok friend
i will give you a reference
i believe its Quran 18 chapter 86 ayyat
read it

Wikipedia is not an authority on anything. Anyone can post anything. IT would be best if you stopped quoting the Quran, of which you have no knowledge of.

my friend the feeling is mutual
i wont court quran and they leave theory of evolution alone..
which they clearly do not understand..
but they will not..

 

[Clutch]

dude..!!!
you need to study Quran more often
or at least in a language you understand
then you might not be asking me for references
but if you are sincere i can give you references..
that Quran and science are things apart..

Quran is not a book of science. Rather it is a book which does not contradict Science.

Unlike other scriptures it's language is Arabic is a very rich language which can have multiple understandings within the same context.

 

[malik_qasim]

You are misquoting Quran where are the references for the Holy Quranic verses you mentioned? .....you are creating multiple ids so that you can spew all the false stuff here without harming your main id...and i suspect that you are a troll from across the border... and this id and dp both are fake.

haha dude i am a village boy from near kasoor
i do not know how more Pakistani can you get then that

 

[Mythal]

clearly since you cannot think in terms of science and are stuck with an English word.. let me put is this way... Darwin's theory in clear violation of English grammer has no scientific proof behind it

It got the recognition of a scientific theory for a reason. The proof to back it (a evolved version of it) are plenty just try and look for them, macroevolution is performed in labs on daily basis around the world.

 

[war&peace]

ok friend
i will give you a reference
i believe its Quran 18 chapter 86 ayyat
read it

I'm not your friend so don't try to get frank with me and stop quoting me. GTFO

 

[Khafee]

ok friend
i will give you a reference
i believe its Quran 18 chapter 86 ayyat
read it

O enlightened one, do tell this what this Ayah is saying?

 

[Mrc]

It got the recognition of a scientific theory for a reason. The proof to back it (a evolved version of it) are plenty just try and look for them, macroevolution is performed in labs on daily basis around the world.

Really.... like what macroevultions?? Monkeys turned into humans?? Yeah i get it

 

[Mythal]

Really.... like what macroevultions?? Monkeys turned into humans?? Yeah i get it

1. my mistake. I meant microevolution.
2. Monkeys do not turn into humans, they share a common ancestor very down the line. For macroevolution experiments were done on the scale of over 20 years on lizards. You can DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH FOR THAT.

 

[malik_qasim]

Quran is not a book of science. Rather it is a book which does not contradict Science.

Unlike other scriptures it's language is Arabic is a very rich language which can have multiple understandings within the same context.

well mr. Ben Kingsley did a very good job in that add
but it does not change what Islam is all about
the people who are credited with these invention,
are mostly people of Mesopotamian or Levant decent
now these people were inventors, philosophers years before Islam was even born
and they whey were inventors after Arabs conquered those territories..
but the human material remained the same in those land...
and no surprise from ashes they were risen again..
and they did contributed to humanity
i believe it is unfair to categorize them will a specific relgion

 

[Clutch]

well mr. Ben Kingsley did a very good job in that add
but it do not change what Islam is all about
the people who are credited with these invention,
are mostly people people of Mesopotamian or Levant decent
now these people were inventors, philosophers years before Islam was even born
and they whey were inventors after Arabs conquered those territories..
but the human material remained the same in those land...
and no surprise from ashes they were risen again..
and they did contributed to humanity
i believe it is unfair to categorize them will a specific relgion

Science is a global achievement. A lot of different nations and civilizations had their role. It is a building block upon which many different scientists have laid their bricks. A few of those bricks were laid by Muslim thinkers and scientists as well.... That's all... nothing more nothing less...

Ultimate knowledge is beyond any human endeavour.

Period.

 

[django]

@malik_qasim You clearly have no knowledge of Islam or Koran-shareef ie "Earth is flat", even the Holy Bible does not express this let alone the Koran......do yourself a favour log-off, as little knowledge is very dangerous.

 

[malik_qasim]

Science is a global achievement. A lot of different nations and civilizations had their role. It is a building block upon which many different scientists have laid their bricks. A few of those bricks were laid by Muslim thinkers and scientists as well.... That's all... nothing more nothing less...

Ultimate knowledge is beyond any human endeavour.

Period.

yes my friend
nations laid those bricks
not religions,
and specifically great humans,
whom nation lay claims over

 

[Chauvinist]

what the heck are you talking about and what the heck did you teacher study to reach that post. Seriously? Can a mouse evolve into a human? and the answer is not known? and you will try to mutate gene of a mouse? of a living one or of the eggs and sperms for the one to be born?

The heck I'm talking about is far far higher than your tiny little mind..

Go and study Molecular Biology by David Clark.. At leat first two chapters... Then you will be able to talk to me.. I've spent 4 years that made me to do that post...

And one more thing it wasn't for ignorant goons like you...

@Aether People need your attention... @Hell hound Idhar dekho... Aik aur Tabahi...