The question here is not your opinion, about how Malala's fame is helping educate the youth of Pakistan. The question is whether the OP's argument merits any consideration?
You say the only thing wrong is that there is no evidence. How often is it that the intel agencies, and that too the most capable ones, would leave any trace or evidence behind? On the other hand, they would invest their resources in trying to convince you exactly the opposite.
Of course, I have no evidence either. But, I ask you this - Before Gen. Pasha's testimony, how many out there in Pakistan really suspected the NGOs of spying? And how many suspect them now, after Pasha's testimony? I bet the number have changed by a great deal!
But, is there any evidence to support Pasha's statements? No, none at all. So, would you say Pasha shouldn't speak unless he can produce the evidence?
If you were to rely solely on the evidence part when examining the intrusion of any foreign intel agency, then you will encounter nothing but failure.
Oh, and indeed there is nothing wrong with freedom of speech, isn't that why the posts calling him names have survived? So let's not even talk about the survival of the thread.
By the way, are you a shrink to comment on my mental condition? Unless you are one, you should abstain from using such words. It only goes to show you are no better than those who have been calling names at the OP.
What are the OP's argument anyways other than guessing , conjecture , wild conspiracy theories and considering everything as an attack against Islam and Pakistan ? Just as you , the OP didn't have any evidence or proof to back it up .
How often do you see the Intel agencies picking up a girl from a backward area in a third world country from an area under siege , educate her to an extent , make her write what every brave men should have and get her shot/or make herself shoot in the head to pave the way for her rise to fame to conspire against Pakistani by promoting education ? I mean , honestly ! To tell the truth , most of the people believed that she was dead until hopeful news started coming in from U.K. since she was shot in the head and spent weeks in I.C.U. May I ask what exactly has the CIA achieved by it , being the devil's advocate here ? What has changed drastically for Pakistan ? . Even the most capable ones leave some evidence of foul play behind in almost all cases , do we not have a history of false flag operations at hand ? Op MKULTRA ? Pigs of Bay invasion ? Op Mongoose ? Op MKDELTA ? The same agency which is now being alleged , was involved ? . I do not believe in perfection . Even the plausible deniability works to an extent .
Then , I believe we are wasting our time , aren't we ? Discussing maybe , could be , would be and there's no evidence because face it , the agencies do not leave any behind . Yet , we have a lot in knowledge about the acts of many . A lot , nothing changed after Gen.Pasha's testimony , just that the Brutus became an honorable man .
A classic example of an argument from an authority . Nothing else . Despite being valid sometimes for some , doesn't mean that the people should start believing in allegations than the established facts . Gen.Pasha's words weren't remotely enlightening , I assume that you would have realized it , just he was a top ranking former official .
Not really . The biggest man hunt recently , landed a certain doctor in jail , didn't it ? There's always some evidence , otherwise how do you know that the foreign agencies do not really leave any trace ?
Isn't that why the thread is still running too despite calls from several members ? The name calling's not appreciated , but still has to tolerated , under the same freedom .
