What's new

Project 71 :: Aircraft-carrier launch delayed by few weeks

.
they have shaken the Congress more than even 2G, especially after the party lost its deposit in the Hissar by-election. The Congress wasn’t expected to win anyway, but the H-Bomb (Hazare Bomb) blast shook the party’s confidence.....UNQUOTE
 
.
What is political system without political parties? which and how many democratic countries dont have political parties?
Are you an infant?
If people like you could have understood what I said, India would have been a better place.

Did I ever say "political system WITHOUT political parties".....read my post again.

My post actually means that behavior of political parties cannot be changed, instead we should look to change the system by which corrupt politicians are elected(this is one of the things ANNA HAZARE has been fighting for-this clause in present in JAN LOKPAL BILL).

On one hand you are talking against corruption and on the other hand you are talking about leaders like Mayawati......should I mention the list of "ghotalas" Mayawati has been involved in.
See the below link about how Mayawati spends PUBLIC MONEY..........
Mayawati sent empty jet to Mumbai for sandals: WikiLeaks - The Times of India
You are supporting one corrupt leader in order to oppose the other.....This is the immature mindset I was talking about
It seems that you are an infant...needs to be spoon fed.....grow up,think logically.
And if you are not an infant then, going by your logic, you must be a retard.
 
. .
In a new twist, three senior executives of the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (R-ADAG) have filed bail pleas before the Supreme Court saying that they were “merely employees and not actual beneficiaries” in the alleged 2G scam.

If their bail pleas are accepted, it would imply that the true beneficiaries are their bosses – including, perhaps, group chairman Anil Ambani.

If so...why is Anil Ambani meeting PC Chidambaram every wednesday at his office? his private jets have been used by Maino families.....Nira Radia tapes revealed: Congress tau apni dukan hai.....

India is fooked up...

---------- Post added at 01:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:16 AM ----------

If people like you could have understood what I said, India would have been a better place.

Did I ever say "political system WITHOUT political parties".....read my post again.

My post actually means that behavior of political parties cannot be changed, instead we should look to change the system by which corrupt politicians are elected(this is one of the things ANNA HAZARE has been fighting for-this clause in present in JAN LOKPAL BILL).

On one hand you are talking against corruption and on the other hand you are talking about leaders like Mayawati......should I mention the list of "ghotalas" Mayawati has been involved in.
See the below link about how Mayawati spends PUBLIC MONEY..........
Mayawati sent empty jet to Mumbai for sandals: WikiLeaks - The Times of India
You are supporting one corrupted leader in order to oppose the other.....This is the immature mindset I was talking about
It seems that you are an infant...needs to be spoon fed.....grow up,think logically.
And if you are not an infant then you must be a retard.

Dude Mayawati is a pc of shik, dont twist my words......She is chor...now what defense do u have? where did I praise Mayawati baskar?
 
. .
Dude Mayawati is a pc of shik, dont twist my words......She is chor...now what defense do u have? where did I praise Mayawati baskar?
Are you suffering from Alzheimer Disease?....forgetting what you wrote previously.
see the post below..........
However, Narendra Modi, Mayawati and Team Anna are its worst nightmares. The party is equally worried about the Comptroller and Auditor General of India Vinod Rai’s future moves. Its leadership is convinced that if these few individuals are neutralised, a decisive victory in the 2012 Assembly polls and the 2014 general elections will be easy. For the past few weeks, it has unleashed political and administrative instruments to demoralise and demolish these individuals. The objective is clear: if you can’t defeat them, defame them. UNQUOTE...

You mentioned Mayawati's name along with team ANNA as she is also causing trouble to the Congress.....but ANNA and Mayawati are causing trouble for different(opposite) reasons......Mayawati is not against corruption, she is causing trouble for her own political benifit.....so when you name them together, people will obviously think that you are also supporting Mayawati along with Anna.


By the way, You also should not twist my words.....Oh! for that you need to first understand what I am saying :lol:
I am asking again, where did i say "political system WITHOUT political parties"?
 
.
Our AC are of 40000T displacement range ie around 30-40 fighters can be decked... in comparison china is trying its hands on varyag ~65000t capacity ie. around 50-60 fighters can be decked on it... shouldn't we rethink the plans for IAC2 and IAC3 ?

They can't carry that many fighters, but most probably that many aircrafts, which includes helicopters too. Groshkov is estimated with around 22 fighters, IAC 1 around 30 possibly and the capacity of the chinese carriers are still unreliable but it is already clear that IAC 2 and followers will be bigger and will carry more fighters. Btw, the reason why IAC 2 is said to be long way off is once, because the production capabilities of our docks in the carrier building field has to be seen, during the development of IAC 1. We are completely new in this field and although we might have help from Italian and Russian assistance, a development without any problems and delays would be highly surprising. However, it will be a huge learning curve for us and we will gain a lot experience, that could make some things easier in the IAC 2 development.
The second reason is, that there is a lot of pre-planning needed, before you can launch a new carrier. You need to know what take of system the carrier will have for its fighters, ski-jump or catapults, because the selection of a carrier fighter is greatly dependent on that. Not to mention that the selection of the aircrafts is critical for the design too, because it defines also what size the hangar must have, what size and weight limit the elevators must have, how many aircrafts the carrier will accommodate...
So far we are still in an very early stage of the development of IAC 2, they cleared a development partner, they are gathering infos about possible carrier fighters and AEW aircrafts, they are trying to get catapults..., still so much to do, so we shouldn't jump into too high expectations yet.

---------- Post added at 10:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 PM ----------

@ somnathsn and ashok321

Like blackops mentioned, this threat is about IAC 2 and Indian carriers in general, please stick to topic and discuss political issues in the right threads or via PM!
 
.
how many countries in the world anyway have the capability to build an AC from scratch ??
 
.
Dude that was a quote on Mayawati...nothing mine,,, anyway she is currupt reiterated by me...

---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 AM ----------

Like blackops mentioned, this threat is about IAC 2 and Indian carriers in general, please stick to topic


MOD is controlled by whom?
 
.
I heard second IAC will be named as INS Vishal. What a Trio first as Viraat, Vikramaditya, Vikrant then as Vikramanditya, Vikrant, Vishal. 3 Vs of Indian Navy.

Anyway few week late is not considered as late.
 
.
@ somnathsn and ashok321

Like blackops mentioned, this threat is about IAC 2 and Indian carriers in general, please stick to topic and discuss political issues in the right threads or via PM!
I won't discuss political issues further............

But let me tell you(and to those who are advising us to stick to the thread) one thing.............this thread is not just about IACs, it's actually about DELAY in Aircraft-carrier launch.....which obviously raises the question of why there is a delay.....and political system/will comes into this as it is a government project.........so logically, we were actually discussing correctly and you guys are taking it to the wrong direction.
So I would request you guys to at least read the thread title(if not the whole body) carefully before advising others.
Even the thread starter started the thread by saying "India’s poor record in meeting deadlines............."
 
.
I won't discuss political issues further............

But let me tell you(and to those who are advising us to stick to the thread) one thing.............this thread is not just about IACs, it's actually about DELAY in Aircraft-carrier launch.....which obviously raises the question of why there is a delay.....and political system/will comes into this as it is a government project.........so logically, we were actually discussing correctly and you guys are taking it to the wrong direction.
So I would request you guys to at least read the thread title(if not the whole body) carefully before advising others.
Even the thread starter started the thread by saying "India’s poor record in meeting deadlines............."

I read somewhere that project got delayed due to delay import of particular kind of Steel from Russia, later on SAIL stated manufacturing it and project got the pace. I think the launch is 2yrs delayed. Also time would be consumed for sea-trials also.
 
.
I read somewhere that project got delayed due to delay import of particular kind of Steel from Russia, later on SAIL stated manufacturing it and project got the pace. I think the launch is 2yrs delayed. Also time would be consumed for sea-trials also.
This is what we should be actually discussing............why there is a delay?

There can be different reasons.....political/apolitical etc......and when you are suggesting any particular reason then you should back it up with proofs (preferably links from credible sites).
 
.
This is what we should be actually discussing............why there is a delay?

There can be different reasons.....political/apolitical etc......and when you are suggesting any particular reason then you should back it up with proofs (preferably links from credible sites).

Here is the proof from 2008 Hindu paper. It says
Originally, the carrier was to have been built by 2012. But a delay in arrival of indigenous steel — after efforts to import steel from Russia ran aground — caused it to be a year behind schedule. After steel was cut for the construction in April, 2005, there was considerable delay.

The Hindu : National : Keel-laying of indigenous aircraft carrier in December
 
.
Back
Top Bottom