Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes when needed will be grounded so cheapest and best optionF-16 is the cheapest and best option besides jf-17 block 3
Why i am having a feeling that there is huge factor of corruption In Air Force which create hurdles in acquiring a new platform ?! We should have bought or lease 50 J-10's with AESA and IRST to increase our numbers ..
NO... PAF doesn't have any such need, or may be its invisible to me!PAF has a need for an off-the-shelf fighter to provide additional capabilities – i.e. range and payload.
NO... PAF doesn't have any such need, or may be its invisible to me!
You are most welcome to enlighten me on this unseen unheard need!
However, I do agree that by 2025, PAF should have a newer airframe, but considering PAC establishment.... I don't see an off the shelf fighter in any foreseeable future of PAF.
Non the less, the speed with which technology is moving forward, I trust loiter time and pay load of JF-17 will also improve.
F-16 is a potent frame and PAF likes it and would like to have more of it, mainly because of existing infrastructure, but in presence of F-17, its charm is fading away.
I don't expect more tradeoff deals by PAF in future, just to secure more F-16.
40 Sukhoi-35
40 Gripen or 40 J11
- Should be enough for modernization and take off the burden from F16