What's new

Procurement of new aircraft in PAF

.
(F16 India+) order ker do , lets see how low we will go before we order something like Sukhoi-35 or better

Is there any proof that america has clinched the vaunted indian mmrca deal? Or this something different altogether?
 
.
What about 18 Mirage-2000-5
As far as I know J-10 C is pretty much done deal. Only question in my mind is whether we would stop at J-10 C and BLOCK III or we may try go for some other 4.5th Generation also

We should go for J-16 rather then J-10C.
We had talked extensively about getting Mirage from UAE or France and i know that didn't happen.
 
.
What about 18 Mirage-2000-5


We should go for J-16 rather then J-10C.
We had talked extensively about getting Mirage from UAE or France and i know that didn't happen.
A friend of mine was part of the negotiations when talks failed in UAE in 2011
 
. .
We should go for J-16 rather then J-10C.
In technology, J-16 should be the best choice of PAF. There are different versions of J-16, which can meet all requirements of PAF and PN.

But, in reality, China has to consider the relationship with Russia, and J-16 can't be exported.

1) J-16
20190203205552-.jpg
20190203205557-.jpg
20190203205615-.jpg


2) The navy version of J-16: J-16H
20190203200924-.jpg
20190203200728-.jpg


3) The electronic-warfare version of J-16: J-16D
c0b8288cebcf232.jpg
3500a3fe132d606_w620_h344.jpg
img-b3ac7fd80aabd090c2f7ae16604e9e2b.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
In technology, J-16 should be the best choice of PAF. There are different versions of J-16, which can meet all requirements of PAF and PN.

But, in reality, China has to consider the relationship with Russia, and J-16 can't be exported.

1) J-16
View attachment 536871 View attachment 536872 View attachment 536873

2) The navy version of J-16: J-16H
View attachment 536874 View attachment 536875

3) The electronic-warfare version of J-16: J-16D
View attachment 536876 View attachment 536877 View attachment 536878
True but everything is negotiable in a strategic alliance.
 
.
True but everything is negotiable in a strategic alliance.
But Russia can get nothing from the J-16 deal, including engines and ammunition, and it will be really a bad news to Russian Su-30's export.
 
.
But Russia can get nothing from the J-16 deal, including engines and ammunition, and it will be really a bad news to Russian Su-30's export.
Very true but strange things are known to happen in such decisions.
 
.
Hi,

Pakistan trapped the US into the russian afghan war---.
Finally, one soul on PDF who has stated history and geopolitics of that time accurately. Almost all here think that it was Americas war, only a few here know that it was our war long before we pulled the yanks in. The Americans were not too enthusiastic to jump into another proxy war with the Soviets after what happened to them in Vietnam. It took a lot of convincing to pull them in.
 
.
The way out is that PAF leases J 16 .
That way it does not effect Russian relations with either China or Pakistan.
All that is needed is good deplomocy on part of China and with the eco power of China, Russia can seldom refuse.
 
.
What about 18 Mirage-2000-5


We should go for J-16 rather then J-10C.
We had talked extensively about getting Mirage from UAE or France and i know that didn't happen.
We are barely keeping up with thunders..
Nothing is going to come as first pirority if additional money comes will be to update the current fleet...
 
.
I have posted last month about this. Its in the contract that the Chinese can not export any Flanker variants to other countries so its off the table. No point trying to keep bringing it up.
 
.
J20 and j31 if inducted by Chinese will be a good option for strategic strike rôle
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom