What's new

Pro-ISIS mob attacks Kurdish protesters with machetes, knives in Germany

its true sir.

Yeah, tell me more about my country and my people..... educate me more, the man from the other side of the planet.

Without the IS, the US wouldn't have the needed reason to attack Syria. Think about it!

BTW, the Turks are more than happy to comply with US agenda in this case because the Kurdish problem is also Turkey's problem. An independent Turkistan would be a Turkish nightmare.

And yet another conspiracy teorist. :)
 
.
well u re entitled to believe them and their hot gas talk. I have no such intention.
Believe in whatever you want but dont try to look smart by posting your BS everywhere.

BTW, the Turks are more than happy to comply with US agenda in this case because the Kurdish problem is also Turkey's problem. An independent Turkistan would be a Turkish nightmare.
:blink:
 
.
frankly sir US does not need any reason to invade a small county !

It does, by lying, e.g. WMD in Iraq, Gadaffi killing innocent civilians or the alleged Sarin gas attack that didn't work, because Russia intervened and found a diplomatic solution. Now the IS is a pretty damn good excuse to justify an attack on Syria through the backdoor.

And yet another conspiracy teorist. :)

An independent Kurdistan might demand territorial concession from Turkey if not right out separation of Kurdish inhabited areas neighbouring Syria and Iraq. Right now, the Kurds don't have a territorial basis to make such demands.
 
.
It does, by lying, e.g. WMD in Iraq, Gadaffi killing innocent civilians or the alleged Sarin gas attack that didn't work, because Russia intervened and found a diplomatic solution. Now the IS is a pretty damn good excuse to justify an attack on Syria through the backdoor.



An independent Kurdistan might demand territorial concession from Turkey if not right out separation of Kurdish inhabited areas neighbouring Syria and Iraq. Right now, the Kurds don't have a territorial basis to make such demands.
but they can not attack the Assad Govt of Syria using IS as justification. Unless u want to say that IS and Assad are same. Also IS is not the only player in Syria. But in Iraq is the main player.
 
.
It does, by lying, e.g. WMD in Iraq, Gadaffi killing innocent civilians or the alleged Sarin gas attack that didn't work, because Russia intervened and found a diplomatic solution. Now the IS is a pretty damn good excuse to justify an attack on Syria through the backdoor.
On 15 August 2003, Libya's UN ambassador, Ahmed Own, submitted a letter to the UN Security Council formally accepting "responsibility for the actions of its officials" in relation to the Lockerbie bombing.

Pan Am Flight 103 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why did Libya accepted the responsibility if they was so innocent?
There is a saying ''being more royalist than king himself''
 
.
These recent attacks by Kurdish terrorist will only cause less sympathy for Kurds on the long term. Turks are no ISIS supporters but PKK is not better than ISIS. It the job of NATO to tell these Kurds to stop otherwise some where Turkish patience is going to brake and they will regret it. If they continue like this PKK will have to fight Turkey too. They burnt several schools, hospitals and cars that were helping Syrian refugees including Kurds. they don't care about Kurds, they want a piece out of Turkey.
 
.
but they can not attack the Assad Govt of Syria using IS as justification. Unless u want to say that IS and Assad are same. Also IS is not the only player in Syria. But in Iraq is the main player.

You are indeed very naive. Of course the US is not declaring that they are attacking Assad, but they attack the IS on Syrian territory.
 
. .
Pan Am Flight 103 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why did Libya accepted the responsibility if they was so innocent?
There is a saying ''being more royalist than king himself''


Excuse me, I can't remember that the last invasion on Libya was justified with PanAm 103.

Aside from that, Gaddafi was coerced to accept the swallow that and pay a huge ransom or else the US would have invaded Libya back then. It's indeed an open secret that the PanAm bomb was planted by the CIA.

they are also bombarding IS on Iraqi territory. what about that?

You are indeed very, very naive. Of course they do that. How would it look like to the public if the US only bombs IS in Syria and not in Iraq?

:disagree:
 
.
Excuse me, I can't remember that the last invasion on Libya was justified with PanAm 103.
Someone who orders a terrorist attack on a civilian aircraft would also kill everybody who opposes him.

Aside from that, Gaddafi was coerced to accept the swallow that and pay a huge ransom or else the US would have invaded Libya back then. It's indeed an open secret that the PanAm bomb was planted by the CIA.
Yeah sure because US desperately needed Libyan compensation or they would have invaded them. :agree: What you say doesnt make sense at all.
 
.
An independent Kurdistan might demand territorial concession from Turkey if not right out separation of Kurdish inhabited areas neighbouring Syria and Iraq. Right now, the Kurds don't have a territorial basis to make such demands.

Which independent Kurdistan ? Syrian Kurds ?

Syria, Armenia, Greece had territorial claims.. did we gave a fvck ? Nope, we are here, if anyone has territorial claims on our country, they should met us in the battlefield. Other than that no nation can demand land from us with just talk.

Other than that, If Kurds have such power to challenge Turkish army in combat. They should go and save their kin from ISIS.
 
.
Someone who orders a terrorist attack on a civilian aircraft would also kill everybody who opposes him.


Yeah sure because US desperately needed Libyan compensation or they would have invaded them. :agree: What you say doesnt make sense at all.

There are no evidence but an coerced testimony that Gaddafi bombed the PanAm plane. Google is your friend.

The money didn't go to the US, smarty, it went to compensate the victims' families. Don't you think it's clever to kill hundreds of people and someone else has to pay for it?

Which independent Kurdistan ? Syrian Kurds ?

Syria, Armenia, Greece had territorial claims.. did we gave a fvck ? Nope, we are here, if anyone has territorial claims on our country, they should met us in the battlefield. Other than that no nation can demand land from us with just talk.

Other than that, If Kurds have such power to challenge Turkish army in combat. They should go and save their kin from ISIS.

Where did I say there is already an independent Kurdistan? :cheesy:
 
.
Excuse me, I can't remember that the last invasion on Libya was justified with PanAm 103.

Aside from that, Gaddafi was coerced to accept the swallow that and pay a huge ransom or else the US would have invaded Libya back then. It's indeed an open secret that the PanAm bomb was planted by the CIA.



You are indeed very, very naive. Of course they do that. How would it look like to the public if the US only bombs IS in Syria and not in Iraq?

:disagree:
well i was expecting that !
 
.
IS attacks kurdish city kobane, kurds protesting it in germany and pro-IS guys attack on them... And an indian attach it to Turkey.. joke of the day...
actually I suppoet IS and kurds kill each other... I would sponsor it...
 
.
There are no evidence but an coerced testimony that Gaddafi bombed the PanAm plane. Google is your friend.

There are also many conspiracy thoerist sites in Google, seems like Google is indeed a good friend to you.

The money didn't go to the US, smarty, it went to compensate the victims' families.

I never claimed it but you when you said US forced Libya to pay compensation or they would invade them (for whatever reason).

Don't you think it's clever to kill hundreds of people and someone else has to pay for it?

Did you read this theory in one of those ''special truth saying'' websites or just invented it not to look clueless?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom