KRAIT
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 16,971
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
Well there may be other women way better looking than them. For that one can give the argument that Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder.That was precisely my point. This list is just as meaningless as the Hollywood magazines talking about "sexiest man/woman alive" and other stuff. It's all about carefully choreographed publicity campaigns, and to increase magazine sales.
Point is the women who are known to many people. The list is simply meant to rank few women in terms of so called traditional definition of Beauty of majority of the people and their opinion.
According to your argument all these beauty contest are meaningless.
Kindly note that there are other things that are taken into consideration in these contest. This contest is based on votes of the people. A next door neighbor of mine won't make the list as may be only 100 people will know her but Priyanka is known among millions.
Similarly in beauty contest, its just not the looks of woman, its about her presences of mind, style, the way she carries herself and many other points.
May be we shouldn't argue over these poll as these polls are simply based on average people's opinion. Its like who is the leader of the establishment. There may be people way better than Obama or Romney, in terms of character, brain, judgement etc. but point is who attracts the most people and whom people think is favorable as a leader. Its all about people's opinion and discretion.
There has been many beautiful women in our times and past. The term most beautiful and sexiest is all comparative as defined by English language and as common sense.
So I personally thing that it shouldn't be an issue if Priyanka is more beautiful than Aishwarya, its all about who has more number of people supporting them. A woman can't claim that she is most beautiful.