President Trump launches military strike against the Al-Assad regime

[BHarwana]

I wouldn't be surprised if this was a coordinated attack from all sides.

The News here is not USA launched missiles on Syrian Air base. Only six soldiers were killed and one helicopter was destroyed with 60 tomahawks This happens every day in Syria.

The News is some one just gave Iran cruise missile technology. lol

 

[maximuswarrior]

Go trump Go!!!

LOL where is the American flag?

You Americans are a laughable bunch. I can only laugh at such patriotism.

 

[bobo6661]

ISIS Used Chemical Arms at Least 52 Times in Syria and Iraq, Report Says

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/world/middleeast/isis-chemical-weapons-syria-iraq-mosul.html?_r=0


Who is giving ISIS Chemical weapons?

Mayby Assad or Russia, Iran could to ... Or wait it was Mossad Ofcorse its all the Jews fault !!!!! Case closed

 

[BHarwana]

can u post the video here??

They are showing the video on BBC TV if it is posted online will publish it here but tune on BBC and they are showing it after every 15 minutes.

Mayby Assad or Russia, Iran could to ... Or wait it was Mossad Ofcorse its all the Jews fault !!!!!

Are there any doubts in MOSSAD or Israel not being involved?

 

[Luffy 500]

Who is innocent in this war? No one. Secondly you don't mention isis and those quarterbacking them? are they the saints in all of this? Is this a conspiracy?

The syrian people are innocent. The syrian rebel forces defending syrian people are innocent. The turkish people being host to 3 million syrians are innocent and 1 million syrian refugees scattered throughout the world are innocent.

Why should I bother mention ISIS? WTF does this rag tag group of loons got to do with criminality of assad? I mean does the existence of this dubious group justify assad's crimes? Seriously? If anything ISIS bastards aided assad regime's survival in syria. it opened the door for foreign powers to intervene in syria and gave ample room for conspiracy theory paddlers and sectarian mentality people to defend a low life like assad. And does ISIS's heinous crimes even compare to assad regime genocide in syria? Assad is responsible for 1 million syrian deaths. This bastard gassed and barrel bombed 1 day old infants and here you are defending assad with this western narrative of Assad VS ISIS. There is NO false dichotomy of assad VS isis. Both are evil to the core and survive off each other. If there was NO assad there would have been no isis. Hezb'saytans and Putin on the the other hand are milking the existence of isis to the fullest.

 

[ashok321]

Trump weighed three options on Syrian strike: Aides:

 

[R Wing]

true assad is nice person, his father was nice person too and his son would be nice person too
father killed just 100,000 people, son doubled the figure, i dont know whether much people would be left for assad son

Who said Assad is a nice person? Assad is far from perfect but a.) what gives the US the right to intervene and b.) the alternatives are a bunch of terrorists. There are no perfect options in international relations --- just sensible ones and picking the "less of the evils."

Which part of my post are you replying to?

If you disagree with any specific statement I made, please share --- and let's discuss it.

 

[yavar]

لحظات اولیه حمله موشکی آمریکا به سوریه

آمریکا به پایگاه هوایی ارتش سوریه حمله کرد
ساعتی پس از شروع جوسازی رسانه‌ای آمریکایی‌ها در خصوص حمله نظامی به دولت قانونی سوریه، ارتش آمریکا با موشک به یک پایگاه هوایی ارتش سوریه حمله کرد.
http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13960118000056

impact images of U.S navy Tomahawk cruise missile strike on Syria Shayrat airfield
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/04/07/517025/Syria-US-air-base-attack

 

[ziaulislam]

Who said Assad is a nice person? Assad is far from perfect but a.) what gives the US the right to intervene and b.) the alternatives are a bunch of terrorists. There are no perfect options in international relations --- just sensible ones and picking the "less of the evils."

Which part of my post are you replying to?

If you disagree with any specific statement I made, please share --- and let's discuss it.

not necessary, alternatives are there
the reason why terrsit gained foot in iraq and by extension in syria was iraqi shia regime

 

[LeGenD]

You point is good enough but flowed..next time try to avoid getting personal, because you do sound like a fanboy more than others here..The point is Russia has bases in Syria and its troops are all over the place alongside the Syrian army..You kill Russians they will kill you.. it already happened in Syria after the US killed some Russian troops "by mistake", the Russians responded by killing US special forces "by mistake too" or you are not aware of these ground realities..

You tend to mistake propaganda for facts so I am not surprised that you have harbored an inflated sense of Russian power in the region and holistically.

We all saw how much spine Russia had when Turkey shot down its fighter jet near the border. Yes, Russia responded by imposing economic sanctions on Turkey and now the two are best buddies again. However, US is a different beast in comparison.

Only reality you need to understand is that Russia does not have military parity with the US and its forces in Syria will be doomed, should the two decide to exchange blows.

You do realize that the ongoing civil war started in Syria in 2011, and Russia waited 3 straight years to make its move due to fear of American intervention and demise of Assad-led regime in Syria (Libya-style?). Russia stepped-up its game in Syria when American policy on Syria became clear to the world at large, that Assad-led regime won't be toppled.

The only reason Assad-led regime has survived so far in Syria is due to American restraint. However, this might change in the near future. Should US decide to get rid of Syrian regime, no power in the world can stop them. Mark my words.

Please also keep in mind that US have imposed heavy economic sanctions on Russia since 2014 (due to Russian intervention in Ukraine) and Russian economy has suffered a great deal as a consequence (drop from 6th spot to 13th spot in global economic rankings). In this manner, US has ensured that Russia won't find the prospect of a direct military clash with US very encouraging.

Yes, we can expect both the US and Russia to exercise restraint against each other in Syria and/or in another region but Russia has no power over American moves outside its borders. Reality is a bit different from Fanboy fantasies thrown around this forum. I hope you can grasp them.

I am not the fanboy here; I like to call spade a spade.

 

[BHarwana]

Polish diplomats were aware of US plans to strike Syria military base: spokesman
07.04.2017 11:23
Polish diplomats were aware of US plans to launch a strike at a Syrian military base from which Washington says a deadly chemical weapons attack was launched earlier this week, according to a Polish government spokesman.

http://www.thenews.pl/1/10/Artykul/...plans-to-strike-Syria-military-base-spokesman

 

[KAL-EL]

Mayby Assad or Russia, Iran could to ... Or wait it was Mossad Ofcorse its all the Jews fault !!!!! Case closed

The Jews don't even need missiles, they could have just struck that Airfield with a giant Sharknado full of Zionist sharks.

 

[ashok321]

 

[BHarwana]

You tend to mistake propaganda for facts so I am not surprised that you have harbored an inflated sense of Russian power in the region and holistically.

We all saw how much spine Russia had when Turkey shot down its fighter jet near the border. Yes, Russia responded by imposing economic sanctions on Turkey and now the two are best buddies again. However, US is a different beast in comparison.

Only reality you need to understand is that Russia does not have military parity with the US and its forces in Syria will be doomed, should the two decide to exchange blows.

You do realize that the ongoing civil war started in Syria in 2011, and Russia waited 3 straight years to make its move due to fear of American intervention and demise of Assad-led regime in Syria (Libya-style?). Russia stepped-up its game in Syria when American policy on Syria became clear to the world at large, that Assad-led regime won't be toppled.

The only reason Assad-led regime has survived so far in Syria is due to American restraint. However, this might change in the near future. Should US decide to get rid of Syrian regime, no power in the world can stop them. Mark my words.

Please also keep in mind that US have imposed heavy economic sanctions on Russia since 2014 (due to its intervention in Ukraine) and Russian economy has suffered a great deal due to them. In this manner, US has ensured that Russia won't find the prospect of a direct military clash with US very encouraging.

Yes, we can expect both the US and Russia to exercise restraint against each other but Russia has no power over American moves outside its borders. Reality is a bit different from Fanboy fantasies thrown around this forum. I hope you can grasp them.

I am not the fanboy here; I like to call spade a spade.

Every one know Tomahawks are not good when using them against Airfields. Why has USA not used jets to bomb the Airfield or the Tomahawks with Cluster munition warheads. USA is afraid of Russian and Irani retaliation.

 

[yavar]

US informed Russia ahead of Syria strike: officia



U.S targeted empty base ,

proof

سوریه قبل از حمله آمریکا هواپیماهای خود را خارج کرده بود

https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/...ز-حمله-آمریکا-هواپیماهای-خود-را-خارج-کرده-بود

It's not clear when the US contacted them. The US could've contacted Russia when it was too late and the Syrians wouldn't have had enough time to move their aircraft.