What's new

President Trump announces decision on Iran deal LIVE

. . .
Withdrawn from JCPOA with economic sanctions applied. And until the Iranian mullahs sufficiently capitulate to U.S. demands the U.S. will seek to defeat their aims everywhere and pursue people-empowering regime change in Iran itself.

I especially liked the bit when Trump said if HE were the ruling mullahs he'd probably negotiate the same way they currently are doing. Obviously he expects his new approach to yield successful results - he cited progress on North Korea as an example.
 
. .
Withdrawn from JCPOA with economic sanctions applied. And until the Iranian mullahs sufficiently capitulate to U.S. demands the U.S. will seek to defeat their aims everywhere and pursue people-empowering regime change in Iran itself.

I especially liked the bit when Trump said if HE were the ruling mullahs he'd probably negotiate the same way they currently are doing. Obviously he expects his new approach to yield successful results - he cited progress on North Korea as an example.
They are called the iranian government and not the mullah just how you don't like calling your state the zionist entity
 
. .
They are called the iranian government and not the mullah just how you don't like calling your state the zionist entity
It's not the same situation. When the State of Israel was formed the Zionists built their own new government. When the Shah fled and the other opposition groups were purged the mullahs then controlled an already-existing government structure and personnel, though they did add institutions of their own. So it's not difficult to envision a future with the ruling mullahs gone but most of the Iranian government pretty much intact.
 
.
It's not the same situation. When the State of Israel was formed the Zionists built their own new government. When the Shah fled and the other opposition groups were purged the mullahs then controlled an already-existing government structure and personnel, though they did add institutions of their own. So it's not difficult to envision a future with the ruling mullahs gone but most of the Iranian government pretty much intact.

technically israel isn't a legitimate state so it IS the same thing.
 
.
It's not the same situation. When the State of Israel was formed the Zionists built their own new government. When the Shah fled and the other opposition groups were purged the mullahs then controlled an already-existing government structure and personnel, though they did add institutions of their own. So it's not difficult to envision a future with the ruling mullahs gone but most of the Iranian government pretty much intact.
I don't care but call the things in their right name
 
. . .
Now iran back to work and start making your nukes
okgK21zG0E66sCoP26OZ5QPVBLWVJVUmoOFxSDhiSK7hgXKGEglf-gBhPNlk3J16M8j4je6XOuvq0oqZn0G11twiiJC2-Y0Trs5hmBLnSe61xxPk61DnhopvWlCeGnq6nQRnKzgeZZl2Wbpirm3SS7cGOIc252CNEQxHU4paJkQt2laF=w495-h297-nc

You diserve it you won US lose:argh:
 
.
Well looks like Chabahar wont be much use at all.
 
.
What specifically about Trump's approach towards Iran is different from the pre-Obama US approach to Iran?
Pre-Obama? In 2007 the G.W. Bush administration determined Iran halted its nuclear arms program in 2003 and that Iran enriching uranium to weapons-grade levels could not occur until 2014 or so. But before the 2007 determination Bush warned that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons would have "serious consequences": link. So I'm not sure if Bush was president today that his approach to the JCPOA would be much different, though I imagine it would be more multilateral.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom