If it is proven to be true, then we take it as a compliment.
Of course that is true.
He just likes to play the blanket denial game, thinking that it is still 1732 where people have no access to reliable information.
Saying that a horse shit article is literally horse shit is not denial game, You just love to believe by proganda outlet of Saudi regime, well no problem, but spare us of believing that amount of crap please. This article is proven to be written solely based on hate from very first paragraph.
Yet you don't bother to offer a single example. I've already demonstrated to the PDF leadership in the Bibi speech thread why your opinions shouldn't be respected. It appears you're keen to double-down on your goofiness.
Example? Here you are, just a small part of the BS:
So many accusations based on hatred.
Part of the article:
Iran supports al-Qaeda
Not only is Iran responsible for sponsoring Shiite terrorist groups, but Sunni ones too.
You know you are reading a horse shit when A Saudi propaganda outlet talks about supporting Al-Qaeda.
USATODAY.com - Official: 15 of 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were Saudi
Wikileaks: Saudis 'chief funders of al-Qaeda' - Telegraph
Another part:
Assaib ahl al Haqq, a Shiite paramilitary terrorist group responsible for dozens of atrocious attacks and murdering of both Iraqis and Americans.
Yes they did kill Americans and rightly so, because they invaded Iraq based on lies. But killing Iraqis? Dozens of attacks? Except allegations from ISIS sympathizers which is quickly picked up by piss activists and other useless organizations in UN, there is basically no proof that they have killed many Iraqi civilians.
Another horse shit in the article:
What is noteworthy, is that whilst in the past Tehran plotted and implemented most of its terror activities in secret (apart from a few obvious examples such as the 1983 Beirut attack on U.S. Marines); the Islamic Republic seems so at ease today that, as noted by renowned media columnist Diana Moukalled recently, it went public with documenting the appearances of Iranian General Qassim Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force.
So sending a commander to fight ISIS is terrorism? Of course that's expected from a Saudi terrorist sympathizer, because they sympathize with 'innocent and oppressed ISIS militants' fighting evil Iranians. When I say this article seems to have been written by an secret ISIS terrorist, I mean it.
Are you going to trust Al-Arabiya? That's your choice, but for many, it's simply the mouthpiece propaganda source of Saudi regime and they don't even hide it which is a good thing.
