Post Graduate Talib was forced to pick up gun: Mother

[SarthakGanguly]

the license permits only when you start going nuts and violent

This is open to interpretation.

Why was Persia invaded? Or Egypt?

 

[nair]

Stone pelting???? It was ok till you pick up the gun..... You enjoyed your terrorist status for 3 years, now time has come that RR fix your desired appointment......

 

[Salik]

The fact is that he isn't first nor last, as long as elders and text books keep telling kids that Kashmir is disputed and India is occupier the cycle will continue, last 60 and next 60 years. Till there's formal policy and opinion change in the masses. What can India do in this regard lets see.

Some other points:
1. I read that UN wanted to conduct plebiscite in Kashmir under Indian force's supervision after Pakistan withdrew her forces. Why don't the UN deploy internation force to conduct the plebiscite.

2. If there's policy change in the UN regarding Kashmir, why doesn't UN highlight it and pave the way to convert LoC into IB. If she wants to remain indifferent that isn't ground reality.

 

[doppelganger]

Good job @Geralt

as they say ... satark

 

[HAIDER]

Give reason to live.....it happens when take away there right to live, to explore and touch new horizon. Keep army and applying Draconian law in Kashmir ....a reason to split away...its already...

 

[Shamain]

What did u expect from IA. He was a terrorist. Army is doing her job.

The only terrorist in the region is terrorist Indian Army which will be flushed out by ppl of IOK. Soon.

Massive celebrations by indians on Talib shah, a single martyr's death, show their deep fear of people of J and K ,cowardice and deep fear. Poor indians.

 

[I.R.A]

This is open to interpretation.

Why was Persia invaded? Or Egypt?

Those were not against civilians, emperors and kings used to rule at those times. And rules of engagement were clearly communicated and violations if any punished

• The process would start with invasion as the last option, that too after letting know the other party about it
• No harm to children, women, elderly and unarmed and ones who surrender
• No harm and damage to places of worship
• No killing of Priests, Rabbis etc
• No attacks on public property
• No burning down of trees etc.

And if you see these places as Muslim majority today it is not because invaders came in huge numbers and killed everyone there or forced them to convert, people saw and decided.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Those were not against civilians, emperors and kings used to rule at those times. And rules of engagement were clearly communicated and violations if any punished

• The process would start with invasion as the last option, that too after letting know the other party about it
• No harm to children, women, elderly and unarmed and ones who surrender
• No harm and damage to places of worship
• No killing of Priests, Rabbis etc
• No attacks on public property
• No burning down of trees etc.

And if you see these places as Muslim majority today it is not because invaders came in huge numbers and killed everyone there or forced them to convert, people saw and decided.

So the part of fighting only for defense is a lie. Offensive campaigns were fair game.

And the Persians and Egyptians accepted the divine light of Islam leaving their parent faiths they followed for hundreds of years in a few decades.

 

[HariPrasad]

No, not yet.

Studying?

 

[doppelganger]

Studying?

Yup.

 

[HariPrasad]

kaisay chukayin gy yeh qarza hum.

By following his foot steps.You are well come to IOK.

Yup.

Very nice. Good luck.

 

[I.R.A]

So the part of fighting only for defense is a lie. Offensive campaigns were fair game.

And the Persians and Egyptians accepted the divine light of Islam leaving their parent faiths they followed for hundreds of years in a few decades.

Offensive campaigns when (after what)?

And there are examples of today's people who embrace Islam and become better Muslims then us, without being shown a gun or a bomb. So?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Offensive campaigns when (after what)?

And there are examples of today's people who embrace Islam and become better Muslims then us, without being shown a gun or a bomb. So?

What was the pretext for the invasion of Persia for example?

There is a difference between individual conversions and mass conversions. The latest mass conversions are happening in Syria now.

 

[baajey]

Either we wipe out each and every Kashmiri or let them live in peace n dignity.
Blaming the Pakistani interference seems like playing lawn tennis. The ball is the "blame" n the two players are India n Pakistan .
Fucking pathetic.

 

[doppelganger]

Either we wipe out each and every Kashmiri or let them live in peace n dignity.
Blaming the Pakistani interference seems like playing lawn tennis. The ball is the "blame" n the two players are India n Pakistan .
Fucking pathetic.

We cannot wipe them out en masse.

We do not need to or want to wipe them out en masse.

Not even the Sri Lankans could wipe the Tamils out. And they had an ongoing quarter century war there.