1. Yes , yet it is completely irrelevant.The questions of whether it was a coup or revolution have completely overshadowed the issues that lead to Morsi's ouster and the answer to said question was always completely irrelevant .
No, it's a question of the legitimacy of that action. The ousting of an elected president by the military is a CRIME in international law. And if it wasn't for
OUR money, aka "Roz" in Sissawi's jargon, the Sissi and his military stooges, would've been long gone.
Because of that main issue, Egypt is isolated from the civilised world, and no one wants to associate themselves with its criminal regime.
2. No different than any other force which at times has been involved in extrajudicial murder across the years in and out of revolution at peace or at war. Thre question is has the killing of protesters by the Armed Forces been a a result of policy and orders or as a result of individual breaches of ROE across the board, my money is on the latter, however my opinion on the Interior Ministry is far more cynical .
No, one of the reasons Morsi was ousted was because of the ridiculous premise of:
"Your presidency is invalid when the first drop of blood was shed" Holding the head of state personal responsibility.
So, based on that premise, either invalidate Sisi's rule, or bring back Morsi.
Didn't think so, still a hypocrite.
3. Horrendous, yet that is the Egyptian norm. A norm which may continue for decades irrespective of who is in power.
No it was
NOT the norm under Morsi.
Anti government media and rhetoric
THRIVED. there was a discussion in the Media on all levels.
Just blatant lies.
Stop trying to paint a picture where Morsi's elected government as just as bad as Mubarak's and Sissi's regime.
So in the kindest way I can possibly put it, piss off.
You don't get to tell me that, maybe you're used to it in Egypt, but not here.
