NHUDA
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 312
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
lot of people with from Kashmir will not like that even with due respect not thinkable solution.
Got Any other Options .. ??
Realistic Ones !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lot of people with from Kashmir will not like that even with due respect not thinkable solution.
controversy is a good way of advertisement.
yep my first post 7 options available for both point of vies as per personal opinion chenab formula is the best suited one.Got Any other Options .. ??
Realistic Ones !
Well well my friend .. read post 183
leave it bro he is just trolling lot of members banned today may be multi IDAlso a good way to be shown the door.
Controversies should be through cogent arguments .
yep my first post 7 options available for both point of vies as per personal opinion chenab formula is the best suited one.
this is answered in my First Post .. Post # 31 ... Have a Sector wise Referendum ... One For Gilgit , one for Baltistan , Jammu, AJK, Kashmir Valley, ladakh ... Result will be thr for everyone to see & act ...
govts can then sell this idea to thr Masses too !
yep my first post 7 options available for both point of vies as per personal opinion chenab formula is the best suited one.
I m NOT an official Foreign Ambassador of Pakistan so what i proposed is not a "Pakistan Ploy" .... U could have said in the start same like every second indian saving time for both of us .... instead of merry go round ..
<< Harri Singh Sign the Document to us .... Kashmir Bharat ka Atoot angh hai ... till then status quo .... >>
Awain time zaya howa !!!
Just so u know ... Thr is Nothing in the "Plains of Ladakh" which Pakistan "Wants" ... We already Have Deosai, The second-highest plateau after Tibet .. i have Been thr Myself & it is nothing but a tourist Destination (despite being strategic Location) ...
(NO Pakistan is not dependent on Ladakh for control of Siachin & Karakoram Pass (Althoug india is dependent on Ladakh but by My proposed option Ladakh Remains with India & doesnot change the ground situation)
What I (in my personal capacity Want) is end of a 70ish Year old Issue ... & i propose what i believe is a Manageable solution rather thtn the current stubborn one !
U don't like it ... U don't have to .... Although i was expecting a proper response dissecting it or presenting a counter option .. but i guess i asked for too much !
See nothing gonna happen until something magical or very bad happen, if india give Kashmir its beneficial for them they never talk seriously for Azad Kashmir caz they know they are wrong they just annexed Kashmir. If our stance remain strong they will sure come to table.Bhai India won't be giving the Whole region (Almost) & wholesome Access to China on a Platter (including Askai Chin to China) ....We both know its Not realistic .. not happening even if we conduct a war over it !
In both cases, I loses territory held by it, while Pak gains territory or at the very least holds onto it's current areas. In effect, only India makes territorial compromises, while Pak merrily walks away with all the benefit without making any tangible concession.
Now explain why on Earth would India agree to that?
I m NOT an official Foreign Ambassador of Pakistan so what i proposed is not a "Pakistan Ploy" .... U could have said in the start same like every second indian saving time for both of us .... instead of merry go round ..
<< Harri Singh Sign the Document to us .... Kashmir Bharat ka Atoot angh hai ... till then status quo .... >>
Awain time zaya howa !!!
Just so u know ... Thr is Nothing in the "Plains of Ladakh" which Pakistan "Wants" ... We already Have Deosai, The second-highest plateau after Tibet .. i have Been thr Myself & it is nothing but a tourist Destination (despite being strategic Location) ...
(NO Pakistan is not dependent on Ladakh for control of Siachin & Karakoram Pass (Althoug india is dependent on Ladakh but by My proposed option Ladakh Remains with India & doesnot change the ground situation)
What I (in my personal capacity Want) is end of a 70ish Year old Issue ... & i propose what i believe is a Manageable solution rather thtn the current stubborn one !
U don't like it ... U don't have to .... Although i was expecting a proper response dissecting it or presenting a counter option .. but i guess i asked for too much !
Allow me to use simple mathematics to explain why your suggestions are flawed.
For India, Territory held today, I = J+K+Siachin+Ladakh
For Pak, P = AJK+GB
For China, C = Aksai+z(ceded territory)
Now by your suggestion, the outcome is either K goes Pak or independent. What happens then is:
I = J+Ladakh
P= AJK+GB+K+Siachin
C = Aksai+z
or
I = J+Ladakh
P=AJK+GB+Siachin
C=Aksai+z
K
In both cases, I loses territory held by it, while Pak gains territory or at the very least holds onto it's current areas. In effect, only India makes territorial compromises, while Pak merrily walks away with all the benefit without making any tangible concession.
Now explain why on Earth would India agree to that?
Convert LOC to IB and rest in peace.
Or else demand for P-O-K will rise and Pakistan might lose even what is in its control as of now.
@Icarus @Slav DefencePakistan should join Kashmir & become part of India.