What's new

Possibility of funding given to BNP in 1991 for elections

is it me or did anyone read the word "alleged" & not "proven" so where did the ISI admit to supporting the north East insurgencies ? giving 50 crore to BNP is not supporting insurgencies in North east, even RAW support awami league those are political parties of Bangladesh so from where does North East Indian insurgencies comes to the picture ? because as far as i know begum Khaleda Zia is the former prime minister & the current opposition leader of Bangladesh & not north east India


Terrorist camp in Bangladesh during BNP rule is known to every one ... but thanks to current gov all those baster$ destroyed
 
Okay. So according to some newspaper, Inter-Services-Intelligence has been sponsoring terrorism in India. We are now caught red-handed. Damn. What now? This is a moment of joy for you all, and what are you going to do, celebrate on our work being unveiled? Or actually do something. I don't think that is likely.

Anyways, for those who are jumping up and down, time to learn some English.

al·leged   
adjective
doubtful; suspect; supposed:

Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) has admitted to meddling in India's Northeast and funding the right-wing Bangladesh National Party (BNP) during the 1991 general elections in that country.
The admission came from no less than former ISI chief Asad Durrani during a Pakistan Supreme Court hearing on the spy agency's mandate on Wednesday.
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary grilled the former spy agency chief on ISI's funding for politicians both within and outside Pakistan.
Recently a UAE-based daily had alleged that ISI paid Rs 50 crore to BNP chairperson and former PM Khaleda Zia ahead of the 1991 elections in which the BNP won and formed the government.
There are allegations that the ISI has been active in Bangladesh whenever the BNP has been in power (1991-96) and later during 2001-06.
The spy agency was also alleged to have launched a campaign from Bangladesh to destabilise the Northeast by patronising and providing logistic support, including funds, to the insurgent groups operating from Bangladesh.
The ISI is alleged to have supported a network in Bangladesh, which includes the hardline Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI), the BNP and Northeast rebel groups during the BNP's rule.

I highlighted somethings that you will find interesting! Enjoy!
 
Okay. So according to some newspaper, Inter-Services-Intelligence has been sponsoring terrorism in India. We are now caught red-handed. Damn. What now? This is a moment of joy for you all, and what are you going to do, celebrate on our work being unveiled? Or actually do something. I don't think that is likely.

Do any one have doubt about it??

Even your own ex president admit it in public
 
Do any one have doubt about it??

Even your own ex president admit it in public

A female member of Mukhti Bahni admitted all the war-crimes they committed alongside Indian Army in 1971, written in her book.
She said that, the crimes in East Pakistan were committed by the gorillas of Mukhti Bahni and Indian Army, some of them dressed in Pakistani uniforms, and portraited the crimes towards Pakistan Army, to further destabilize East Pakistan.


Why don't you accept her words, who has been in this work, but accept the work of our ex-president. President of Pakistan doesn't have complete knowledge of what is happening inside ISI.

Plus, give a link for your claim.
 
A female member of Mukhti Bahni admitted all the war-crimes they committed alongside Indian Army in 1971, written in her book.
She said that, the crimes in East Pakistan were committed by the gorillas of Mukhti Bahni and Indian Army, some of them dressed in Pakistani uniforms, and portraited the crimes towards Pakistan Army, to further destabilize East Pakistan.


Why don't you accept her words, who has been in this work, but accept the work of our ex-president. President of Pakistan doesn't have complete knowledge of what is happening inside ISI.

WTF :rofl: ... President dnt have knowledge what happening inside ISI
Formally he was your army chief

And who is more credible a xyz lady of ex president ??

Plus, give a link for your claim.

BBC News - Musharraf admits Kashmir militants trained in Pakistan
 
so you dont have problem if RAW support Balochistan freedom fighters rite?? no more whining plz.. :agree::cheers:
Which you're already doing using Afghan Soil but don't come here crying/whining/bitching when something like this happens.By the way the news only confirm that according to Affidavit the payment was given to Hasina and then Daily Mail made it's own conclusion that this money was used for funding north eastern insurgency..Bullsh!t.
2008 Indian embassy bombing in Kabul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
You call them militants, we call them freedom fighters.
They need support to fight for their rights and land, which is occupied by Indians since 1947, and we give them.

They why dnt you call TTP freedom fighters ???

Both kashmiri militant and TTP are in same category its upto you what you want to say them
 
They why dnt you call TTP freedom fighters ???

Both kashmiri militant and TTP are in same category its upto you what you want to say them

That is not the topic over here, but alright.
What do TTP want? Their rule and their power over Pakistan. (That is what they claim).
They target their attacks all over the country, aiming at public places and merely everyone, whereas the Kashmiri freedom fighters just target the occupying forces.
 
What's new here? Most of the Pakistani leaders will start speaking the truth once they are out of office. They are just too chicken to do it when in office.
 
You call them militants, we call them freedom fighters.
They need support to fight for their rights and land, which is occupied by Indians since 1947, and we give them.

And we allegedly do the same for Balochistan.. Tit for Tat.. Enjoy :)
 
And we allegedly do the same for Balochistan.. Tit for Tat.. Enjoy :)
But you are failing terribly aren't you?
In Kashmir, Pakistan accepts to help the freedom fighters who are fighting for their rights, against the Indian Army/Police/Force.
But in Balochistan, you are making terrorists who hardly represent 15% of the Balochis and who don't want so called 'freedom'.
The terrorists target randomly, especially the weak and helpless in fear of retaliation and spread their terrorism.

Too much for 'counter-measures' and failure. Forcing people to seek 'Independence' which they already have. Our Army and ISI has learnt from the 1971, and will not allow anything similar from Saffron forces.
 
That is not the topic over here, but alright.
What do TTP want? Their rule and their power over Pakistan. (That is what they claim).
They target their attacks all over the country, aiming at public places and merely everyone, whereas the Kashmiri freedom fighters just target the occupying forces.

Dnt fool your self........... LeT is Pakistan based terrorist organisation responsible for hundreds of death across India


And we all know you have two definition of terrorism.. good and bad

If any terror group not harming Pakistan so good aka Taliban, LeT
and if killing Pakistani people so bad aka TTP

But you are failing terribly aren't you?
In Kashmir, Pakistan accepts to help the freedom fighters who are fighting for their rights, against the Indian Army/Police/Force.
But in Balochistan, you are making terrorists who hardly represent 15% of the Balochis and who don't want so called 'freedom'.
The terrorists target randomly, especially the weak and helpless in fear of retaliation and spread their terrorism.

Too much for 'counter-measures' and failure. Forcing people to seek 'Independence' which they already have. Our Army and ISI has learnt from the 1971, and will not allow anything similar from Saffron forces.

where you found this figure of 15% ???
 
Dnt fool your self........... LeT is Pakistan based terrorist organisation responsible for hundreds of death across India


And we all know you have two definition of terrorism.. good and bad

If any terror group not harming Pakistan so good aka Taliban, LeT
and if killing Pakistani people so bad aka TTP
Whatever makes you feel good. We are least bothered about what you have to say.
where you found this figure of 15% ???
Out of multi-dozens, only 2-3 major tribes are in favor of partition from Pakistan.
The rest are pro-Pakistan. And I assume that those tribes must be sponsored by your RAW as post number 41 says.
 
No, 1971 was a revenge for sending intruders to kashmir in 1947,1965 ,Balochistan is the payback for supporting Khalistan and still pending....:enjoy::triniti:

Are you trying say that assisting Sindhdesh formation is the payback for Mumbai attacks?
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom