What's new

Policies of France’s leading presidential candidates

Vergennes

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
8,576
Reaction score
61
Country
France
Location
France
http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3203571e-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43

The five candidates for the French presidency, from left: Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Benoit Hamon, Emmanuel Macron, François Fillon and Marine Le Pen © Illustrations by Bijou Karman


France’s presidential election campaign has been overshadowed by allegations of corruption and bouts of political infighting. But behind the sound and fury, there are big policy differences between the main contestants who are offering radically different visions for their country.

The “traditional” party candidates on the centre-right and centre-left are quite hardline by recent standards.

François Fillon, for the Republicans, portrays himself as a French Thatcherite with conservative Catholic values.

Benoît Hamon, for the socialists, has ideas for addressing the “myth of infinite economic growth”. The two “insurgent” candidates in many ways defy left-right categorisation.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen is running on a populist, anti-immigration platform but has spurned economic liberalism in favour of the protective state.

Emmanuel Macron, the independent centrist, borrows from the left on issues of social protection but his pro-business platform falls well to the right of socialist orthodoxy.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the far-left anti-austerity candidate, claims to be true to France’s revolutionary tradition.

Here is where the runners and riders stand on the main issues:

Budget

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F7bc47d2e-0b20-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Ms Le Pen — a fierce critic of austerity — has pledged to cut taxes for households and increase welfare benefits for the working class. Those measures would be paid for, she says, by savings from reduced immigration and withdrawal from the EU. She has also said she would get France’s central bank to print more money to bring down the country’s debt.

In contrast, Mr Fillon has proposed cutting spending — €100bn in savings over five years — and slashing half a million public sector jobs. But he would also lower taxes for businesses and individuals, partly funded by an increase in VAT but also by higher borrowing temporarily.

Mr Macron advocates a Nordic-style economic model for France, mixing more moderate spending cuts of €60bn over five years with a €50bn stimulus package over the same period, lower taxes and an extension of the welfare state. He says he could still keep France’s deficit below the EU’s 3 per cent limit and would cut 50,000 state jobs.

Mr Hamon and Mr Mélenchon would both loosen the government’s purse strings considerably. Mr Hamon wants to roll out a monthly basic income of €750 a month to all citizens and bolster public services — hiring more teachers and medical staff. He would increase public spending by €71bn a year by 2022, funded by higher taxes on business and the wealthy. He has also proposed taxing robots.

Mr Mélenchon would increase spending by more than €250bn a year and raise public sector wages, financed through higher taxes and taking on more debt.

Europe

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F39e5becc-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Ms Le Pen’s promise to ditch the euro if she wins the election — together with her threat of a referendum on a “Frexit” from the EU if she is unable to renegotiate its rules on border-free travel and budget contributions — has already worried investors.

Mr Fillon is calling for more integration but on an intergovernmental basis, such as the creation of a eurozone government of national leaders operating outside the Brussels institutions, and the renegotiation of the Schengen agreement on borderless travel.

Greater co-operation within the EU — on fiscal, environmental and social regulation — is a central pillar of Mr Macron’s agenda. “We need to believe in Europe, love Europe, breathe Europe,” he told a recent campaign rally.

Mr Hamon has urged a similar approach, even calling for a European minimum wage.
But leftist Mr Mélenchon wants a complete renegotiation of European treaties. Failing that, his “plan B” would be to quit the EU altogether.

Immigration

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3af40c7e-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Nativism and “national preference” lie at the heart of Ms Le Pen’s campaign. Not only has she pledged to introduce a quota to cut immigration by 80 per cent to 10,000 people a year, she has also promised an extra tax on employers hiring foreigners and making it harder to acquire French citizenship.

Mr Fillon, too, wants to reduce immigration “to a strict minimum” by adopting annual immigration quotas in parliament and restricting immigrants’ rights to benefits.

Mr Macron, who has praised Chancellor Angela Merkel’s open-door refugee policy that “saved our collective dignity”, is promising to prioritise dealing with asylum requests within six months. France should welcome refugees in need of “protection”, but “other” asylum seekers should be returned to their home country immediately, he says.

Mr Hamon has called on France to accept more refugees and says asylum seekers need greater opportunities to integrate; free French lessons and the right to work after three months feature in his plan.

Mr Mélenchon is less enthusiastic about immigration than his leftwing credentials would suggest, claiming the focus should be on tackling its causes rather than opening France up to refugees.

Labour reform


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3c091b7c-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43


With French unemployment just under 10 per cent, the labour market has become a politically charged issue in the campaign. Strict labour laws, including the flagship 35-hour work week policy, are disliked by many employers but fiercely defended by the unions.

Ms Le Pen intends to maintain the 35-hour week and lower the retirement age but make overtime tax-free.

Mr Fillon has more drastic plans to tackle labour market rigidity, with pledges to introduce a 39-hour week for public sector workers, scrap the limit altogether for the private sector, raise the retirement age and make the firing process easier.

Mr Macron has backed away from the confrontation he provoked when, as economy minister, he suggested scrapping the 35-hour rule; instead, he plans to protect it but introduce flexibility around overtime. He has vowed to leave the retirement age and pensions untouched but would give companies the freedom to negotiate specific deals on working hours and pay.

Both Mr Hamon — who quit the French government in 2014 in protest against its pro-business labour reforms — and Mr Mélenchon have proposed a 32-hour work week. The latter would lower the retirement age from 62 to 60.

Trade


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3d101ce6-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43


As president, Ms Le Pen would reject international trade agreements in favour of “intelligent protectionism” benefiting French companies. Her anti-globalisation push would include a 3 per cent tax on imports and directing public procurement towards French companies.

Mr Fillon’s pro-business stance suggests he would be broadly open to free trade, though he has not outlined any detailed positions.

Mr Macron calls for deeper European co-operation and integration to create a “protective Europe”. This includes, for example, creating an EU mechanism to control foreign takeovers of important industries. He is the only candidate who openly supports trade deals such as the EU-Canada trade deal, Ceta. Such agreements are a bête noire for the leftist candidates.

Mr Hamon and Mr Mélenchon have vowed to pull France out of trade agreements such as Ceta. The latter is running on a platform of what he calls “equitable protectionism” — which includes measures to boost French farming and favour goods produced in France.

Pro-Europe candidate Mr Hamon argues that, like Mr Mélenchon, he is protectionist “but from a European perspective”.

Security and defence


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F7ce98348-0b20-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Many of the candidates have proposed increased spending on defence and policing as part of the fight against terror following attacks over the past two years.

Ms Le Pen wants to quit Nato, almost double the defence budget to 3 per cent of GDP from its current 1.8 per cent level, and reintroduce military service. Controversially, she supports closer relations between France and Russia, arguing that Moscow is critical to defeating Isis in the Middle East.

Mr Fillon has outlined a plan to raise spending on defence, security and justice by €12bn a year and create thousands more prison places. He has also called for a rapprochement with Russia on Syria — and, in the past, has signalled a willingness to negotiate with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

Mr Macron would increase defence spending to 2 per cent, add 10,000 police officers and restore a networks of field agents to combat Islamist terror. He has said his top foreign policy goal is “to kill Isis” and called for greater co-operation with the US to do so.

Like Ms Le Pen, Mr Hamon proposes a defence budget at 3 per cent of GDP and would bulk up the police force.
Mr Mélenchon would pull France out of Nato and boost police numbers.

https://www.ft.com/content/7fa14c80-fdd1-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30

@Philia @LA se Karachi @flamer84
 
Last edited:
. .
http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3203571e-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43

The five candidates for the French presidency, from left: Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Benoit Hamon, Emmanuel Macron, François Fillon and Marine Le Pen © Illustrations by Bijou Karman


France’s presidential election campaign has been overshadowed by allegations of corruption and bouts of political infighting. But behind the sound and fury, there are big policy differences between the main contestants who are offering radically different visions for their country.

The “traditional” party candidates on the centre-right and centre-left are quite hardline by recent standards.

François Fillon, for the Republicans, portrays himself as a French Thatcherite with conservative Catholic values.

Benoît Hamon, for the socialists, has ideas for addressing the “myth of infinite economic growth”. The two “insurgent” candidates in many ways defy left-right categorisation.
Far-right leader Marine Le Pen is running on a populist, anti-immigration platform but has spurned economic liberalism in favour of the protective state.

Emmanuel Macron, the independent centrist, borrows from the left on issues of social protection but his pro-business platform falls well to the right of socialist orthodoxy.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the far-left anti-austerity candidate, claims to be true to France’s revolutionary tradition.

Here is where the runners and riders stand on the main issues:

Budget

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F7bc47d2e-0b20-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Ms Le Pen — a fierce critic of austerity — has pledged to cut taxes for households and increase welfare benefits for the working class. Those measures would be paid for, she says, by savings from reduced immigration and withdrawal from the EU. She has also said she would get France’s central bank to print more money to bring down the country’s debt.

In contrast, Mr Fillon has proposed cutting spending — €100bn in savings over five years — and slashing half a million public sector jobs. But he would also lower taxes for businesses and individuals, partly funded by an increase in VAT but also by higher borrowing temporarily.

Mr Macron advocates a Nordic-style economic model for France, mixing more moderate spending cuts of €60bn over five years with a €50bn stimulus package over the same period, lower taxes and an extension of the welfare state. He says he could still keep France’s deficit below the EU’s 3 per cent limit and would cut 50,000 state jobs.

Mr Hamon and Mr Mélenchon would both loosen the government’s purse strings considerably. Mr Hamon wants to roll out a monthly basic income of €750 a month to all citizens and bolster public services — hiring more teachers and medical staff. He would increase public spending by €71bn a year by 2022, funded by higher taxes on business and the wealthy. He has also proposed taxing robots.

Mr Mélenchon would increase spending by more than €250bn a year and raise public sector wages, financed through higher taxes and taking on more debt.

Europe

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F39e5becc-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Ms Le Pen’s promise to ditch the euro if she wins the election — together with her threat of a referendum on a “Frexit” from the EU if she is unable to renegotiate its rules on border-free travel and budget contributions — has already worried investors.

Mr Fillon is calling for more integration but on an intergovernmental basis, such as the creation of a eurozone government of national leaders operating outside the Brussels institutions, and the renegotiation of the Schengen agreement on borderless travel.

Greater co-operation within the EU — on fiscal, environmental and social regulation — is a central pillar of Mr Macron’s agenda. “We need to believe in Europe, love Europe, breathe Europe,” he told a recent campaign rally.

Mr Hamon has urged a similar approach, even calling for a European minimum wage.
But leftist Mr Mélenchon wants a complete renegotiation of European treaties. Failing that, his “plan B” would be to quit the EU altogether.

Immigration

http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3af40c7e-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Nativism and “national preference” lie at the heart of Ms Le Pen’s campaign. Not only has she pledged to introduce a quota to cut immigration by 80 per cent to 10,000 people a year, she has also promised an extra tax on employers hiring foreigners and making it harder to acquire French citizenship.

Mr Fillon, too, wants to reduce immigration “to a strict minimum” by adopting annual immigration quotas in parliament and restricting immigrants’ rights to benefits.

Mr Macron, who has praised Chancellor Angela Merkel’s open-door refugee policy that “saved our collective dignity”, is promising to prioritise dealing with asylum requests within six months. France should welcome refugees in need of “protection”, but “other” asylum seekers should be returned to their home country immediately, he says.

Mr Hamon has called on France to accept more refugees and says asylum seekers need greater opportunities to integrate; free French lessons and the right to work after three months feature in his plan.

Mr Mélenchon is less enthusiastic about immigration than his leftwing credentials would suggest, claiming the focus should be on tackling its causes rather than opening France up to refugees.

Labour reform


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3c091b7c-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43


With French unemployment just under 10 per cent, the labour market has become a politically charged issue in the campaign. Strict labour laws, including the flagship 35-hour work week policy, are disliked by many employers but fiercely defended by the unions.

Ms Le Pen intends to maintain the 35-hour week and lower the retirement age but make overtime tax-free.

Mr Fillon has more drastic plans to tackle labour market rigidity, with pledges to introduce a 39-hour week for public sector workers, scrap the limit altogether for the private sector, raise the retirement age and make the firing process easier.

Mr Macron has backed away from the confrontation he provoked when, as economy minister, he suggested scrapping the 35-hour rule; instead, he plans to protect it but introduce flexibility around overtime. He has vowed to leave the retirement age and pensions untouched but would give companies the freedom to negotiate specific deals on working hours and pay.

Both Mr Hamon — who quit the French government in 2014 in protest against its pro-business labour reforms — and Mr Mélenchon have proposed a 32-hour work week. The latter would lower the retirement age from 62 to 60.

Trade


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3d101ce6-0b16-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43


As president, Ms Le Pen would reject international trade agreements in favour of “intelligent protectionism” benefiting French companies. Her anti-globalisation push would include a 3 per cent tax on imports and directing public procurement towards French companies.

Mr Fillon’s pro-business stance suggests he would be broadly open to free trade, though he has not outlined any detailed positions.

Mr Macron calls for deeper European co-operation and integration to create a “protective Europe”. This includes, for example, creating an EU mechanism to control foreign takeovers of important industries. He is the only candidate who openly supports trade deals such as the EU-Canada trade deal, Ceta. Such agreements are a bête noire for the leftist candidates.

Mr Hamon and Mr Mélenchon have vowed to pull France out of trade agreements such as Ceta. The latter is running on a platform of what he calls “equitable protectionism” — which includes measures to boost French farming and favour goods produced in France.

Pro-Europe candidate Mr Hamon argues that, like Mr Mélenchon, he is protectionist “but from a European perspective”.

Security and defence


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com%2F7ce98348-0b20-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43



Many of the candidates have proposed increased spending on defence and policing as part of the fight against terror following attacks over the past two years.

Ms Le Pen wants to quit Nato, almost double the defence budget to 3 per cent of GDP from its current 1.8 per cent level, and reintroduce military service. Controversially, she supports closer relations between France and Russia, arguing that Moscow is critical to defeating Isis in the Middle East.

Mr Fillon has outlined a plan to raise spending on defence, security and justice by €12bn a year and create thousands more prison places. He has also called for a rapprochement with Russia on Syria — and, in the past, has signalled a willingness to negotiate with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

Mr Macron would increase defence spending to 2 per cent, add 10,000 police officers and restore a networks of field agents to combat Islamist terror. He has said his top foreign policy goal is “to kill Isis” and called for greater co-operation with the US to do so.

Like Ms Le Pen, Mr Hamon proposes a defence budget at 3 per cent of GDP and would bulk up the police force.
Mr Mélenchon would pull France out of Nato and boost police numbers.

https://www.ft.com/content/7fa14c80-fdd1-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30

@Philia @LA se Karachi @flamer84


Very nice summary of each of the candidates' political positions. Thanks for sharing.
 
. .
@Vergennes @Taygibay @Louiq XIV Who are you guys voting for / supporting?

I planned to vote for Fillon,as I did in the Right primary,but the fake jobs allegations and the probe opened by the justice really bothers me. I liked his planned policies and his seriousness and cleanliness compared to others. But yeah,it's a slap. After all,it's public money. (Compare people working hard to survive during the month with some paid hundred thousands of €€ to do nothing.)

I could change the candidate I would vote too as I am waiting for more TV debates to learn more about other candidates and their planned policies.

The Socialist candidate (Hamon) is already dead,his supports are jumping from the sinking ship,there's no hope for him. I feel sad anyway for him,Politics is really a b*tch.

The Centrist candidate ? (Macron) Why not ? Not a fan of the guy,but he has a good project imo,balanced,a good conpromise between the extremes from the left and the right.

Marine Le Pen.... (National Front) well. A part from immigration and islam,the rest is empty. I don't know much about her other planned policies nor how she will implement them. During the TV debate last week,yeah,when the subjects of immigration and islam ended,she tried to make herself little and unnoticed... lol.
And she's emboiled in many scandals,such as the EU parliament thing. Not even talking about the 'transparence' of her party.

I won't talk about the other candidates ; either conspiracy theorists (who think EU is a CIA thing) or communists,marxists,trotskysts,lenninist whatsoever.
 
.
I'm a Trotsko-Gaullist so Macron!

Great day Khafee mate and all, Tay.

P.S. Great didactic tool but I like my
tongue in cheek summary better. 8-)
C'est French politics for dummies tes
p'tits graphiques! :whistle:
 
Last edited:
. .
Trotsko-Gaullist ?
ça existe ça ?

I am for a government that ensures a strong autonomous nation.
Once that works, its job should be to allow maximal liberty to all.

You could say republican for short but it's neither the present LR
or equivalent GOP in the US. More like a Convention Republican.

Girondin/Montagnard between Danton and Robespierre in wartime
and from Condorcet right up to Jaurès and beyond if peace allows.

Anything but Thiers in any case!


It ain't easy to explain a position that's result-based and so variable.
When speaking to Yankees, I use Kennedo-Marxist instead :jester:

We'd need a Philosophy of Politics thread for further details :angel:


Vivement le 23, tiens!

Bonjour chez vous, Tay.
 
Last edited:
. .
Why aren't the feminists who rooted for Hilary Clinton excited about the possibility of a woman running France?
 
. . .
Why aren't the feminists who rooted for Hilary Clinton excited about the possibility of a woman running France?

Clinton was Classic Right ( which passes for the Left in America ).
Le Pen is at the helm of a Far Right party that was until recently
reeking with racist and anti-semitic miasmas, founded by her dad.
If anything, that's almost as toxic as the big Duck in Washington.

I wouldn't want Boy George or Kanye West to represent all men,
nor Donald, nor Duterte, etc.

Besides, we have more intelligent women than feminists in France!
:partay:

Good evening mate, Tay.
 
. .
I would've replied to this before, but was a bit busy with a Uni project.

Budget
Ms Le Pen — a fierce critic of austerity — has pledged to cut taxes for households and increase welfare benefits for the working class. Those measures would be paid for, she says, by savings from reduced immigration and withdrawal from the EU. She has also said she would get France’s central bank to print more money to bring down the country’s debt.
Delusional
In contrast, Mr Fillon has proposed cutting spending — €100bn in savings over five years — and slashing half a million public sector jobs. But he would also lower taxes for businesses and individuals, partly funded by an increase in VAT but also by higher borrowing temporarily.
It looks like something that might work
Mr Macron advocates a Nordic-style economic model for France, mixing more moderate spending cuts of €60bn over five years with a €50bn stimulus package over the same period, lower taxes and an extension of the welfare state. He says he could still keep France’s deficit below the EU’s 3 per cent limit and would cut 50,000 state jobs.
This might work too.......
Mr Hamon wants to roll out a monthly basic income of €750 a month to all citizens and bolster public services — hiring more teachers and medical staff. He would increase public spending by €71bn a year by 2022, funded by higher taxes on business and the wealthy. He has also proposed taxing robots.
This guy....:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Mr Mélenchon would increase spending by more than €250bn a year and raise public sector wages, financed through higher taxes and taking on more debt.
:close_tema:

In short about budget I like Mr.Fillon's plan and I think this has the highest chances to work. Macron's plan sounds nice as well. Rest are totally delusional.....I wonder how they sell these ideas to people.


Europe
Ms Le Pen’s promise to ditch the euro if she wins the election — together with her threat of a referendum on a “Frexit” from the EU if she is unable to renegotiate its rules on border-free travel and budget contributions — has already worried investors.
Her main agenda, I guess...............France leaving will surely hurt EU but I'm not sure that it will benefit France either...
Mr Fillon is calling for more integration but on an intergovernmental basis, such as the creation of a eurozone government of national leaders operating outside the Brussels institutions, and the renegotiation of the Schengen agreement on borderless travel.
Rational........I like it...
Greater co-operation within the EU — on fiscal, environmental and social regulation — is a central pillar of Mr Macron’s agenda. “We need to believe in Europe, love Europe, breathe Europe,” he told a recent campaign rally.
Getting overboard but what he says is not necessarily bad.
Mr Hamon has urged a similar approach, even calling for a European minimum wage.
Leftists like the concept of minimum wage...but not necessarily bad either.
Mr Mélenchon wants a complete renegotiation of European treaties. Failing that, his “plan B” would be to quit the EU altogether.
As expected.

On Europe as well I'd agree with Mr. Fillon's approach....sensible and not that hard to do....
Macron and Hamon's policy is not bad either.

Immigration

Nativism and “national preference” lie at the heart of Ms Le Pen’s campaign. Not only has she pledged to introduce a quota to cut immigration by 80 per cent to 10,000 people a year, she has also promised an extra tax on employers hiring foreigners and making it harder to acquire French citizenship.

Mr Fillon, too, wants to reduce immigration “to a strict minimum” by adopting annual immigration quotas in parliament and restricting immigrants’ rights to benefits.

Mr Macron, who has praised Chancellor Angela Merkel’s open-door refugee policy that “saved our collective dignity”, is promising to prioritise dealing with asylum requests within six months. France should welcome refugees in need of “protection”, but “other” asylum seekers should be returned to their home country immediately, he says.

Mr Hamon has called on France to accept more refugees and says asylum seekers need greater opportunities to integrate; free French lessons and the right to work after three months feature in his plan.

Mr Mélenchon is less enthusiastic about immigration than his leftwing credentials would suggest, claiming the focus should be on tackling its causes rather than opening France up to refugees.
I'm not sure where I stand on immigration......that's a hot issue these days. Well I agree with Mr. Melenchon but that's not a policy...
Labour reform

Ms Le Pen intends to maintain the 35-hour week and lower the retirement age but make overtime tax-free.
No radical change here from Lady Le Pen :(
Mr Fillon has more drastic plans to tackle labour market rigidity, with pledges to introduce a 39-hour week for public sector workers, scrap the limit altogether for the private sector, raise the retirement age and make the firing process easier.
Doesn't sound right but works..
Mr Macron has backed away from the confrontation he provoked when, as economy minister, he suggested scrapping the 35-hour rule; instead, he plans to protect it but introduce flexibility around overtime. He has vowed to leave the retirement age and pensions untouched but would give companies the freedom to negotiate specific deals on working hours and pay.
Business as usual...and worded nicely.....Macron looks like a polished guy but does he lack substance?
Both Mr Hamon — who quit the French government in 2014 in protest against its pro-business labour reforms — and Mr Mélenchon have proposed a 32-hour work week. The latter would lower the retirement age from 62 to 60.
Way to hurt your economy :astagh:

Fillon's policy is good for business and good for economy........Macron's one sounds good looks better than other's policies.
Trade

As president, Ms Le Pen would reject international trade agreements in favour of “intelligent protectionism” benefiting French companies. Her anti-globalisation push would include a 3 per cent tax on imports and directing public procurement towards French companies.

Mr Fillon’s pro-business stance suggests he would be broadly open to free trade, though he has not outlined any detailed positions.

Mr Macron calls for deeper European co-operation and integration to create a “protective Europe”. This includes, for example, creating an EU mechanism to control foreign takeovers of important industries. He is the only candidate who openly supports trade deals such as the EU-Canada trade deal, Ceta. Such agreements are a bête noire for the leftist candidates.

Mr Hamon and Mr Mélenchon have vowed to pull France out of trade agreements such as Ceta. The latter is running on a platform of what he calls “equitable protectionism” — which includes measures to boost French farming and favour goods produced in France.

Pro-Europe candidate Mr Hamon argues that, like Mr Mélenchon, he is protectionist “but from a European perspective”.
I don't have much idea about the trade deals and their affects on France. But I personally like Free trade.

Security and defence

Ms Le Pen wants to quit Nato, almost double the defence budget to 3 per cent of GDP from its current 1.8 per cent level, and reintroduce military service. Controversially, she supports closer relations between France and Russia, arguing that Moscow is critical to defeating Isis in the Middle East.

Mr Fillon has outlined a plan to raise spending on defence, security and justice by €12bn a year and create thousands more prison places. He has also called for a rapprochement with Russia on Syria — and, in the past, has signalled a willingness to negotiate with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

Mr Macron would increase defence spending to 2 per cent, add 10,000 police officers and restore a networks of field agents to combat Islamist terror. He has said his top foreign policy goal is “to kill Isis” and called for greater co-operation with the US to do so.

Like Ms Le Pen, Mr Hamon proposes a defence budget at 3 per cent of GDP and would bulk up the police force.
Mr Mélenchon would pull France out of Nato and boost police numbers.

Well, there is only information about the policies of Le Pen, Fillon and Macron....I don't like what Fillon plans to do here. Macron's plan sounds better.....France's main goal should be eliminating the terrorists inside France...why care so much about what happens in ME? Boosting number of police officers will probably make France safer from terrorist attacks at home........... Macron wants greater co-operation with USA...that's nice and all but what's US's position these days? So much randomness....


If I were allowed to vote...........I'd have a hard time choosing between Fillon and Macron...policy wise Fillon wins hands down but voting for a guy with scandal is something that would give me some bad feelings..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom