Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
This borders cynicism.
Real 'change' is almost always gradual. Appearing not to but still 'significant'. Some of make it sound like Pakistan is the same country now which it was in 1947 when they were using thorns from trees as paperclips.
It remains to be seen what will be 'impact' of Imran Khan. But he has a track-record of tenacity. Of enforcing discipline. Of personal (at least financial) integrity. Of taking up the heat with constant 'Taliban Khan' label but not budging from his stance.
Until barely a few weeks ago I too was skeptical. I have been a PPP supporter since about mid-80's. But I'd wager that Imran Khan is very likely to curtail corruption, improve efficiency, recover stolen moneys, cut down terrorism within five years of his rule. These alone will go a long way in reducing dependence on foreign so-called 'aid'.
Let he be very well protected! He is the biggest obstacle to the enemies of Pakistan since Zulfi Bhutto.
that maybe a problem later, it might give oxygen to establishment without coming in front with their own players. as you said real change is gradual, so how exactly can it be ensured that he would not be just used to bring back money and correct malfunctioning of the system and then continue with the same old practises ? and on the other hand with intellectual corruption prevailing in intelligentsia, even a more vigilant society may not be able to continue with the "gradual change".
just my fears. Transformation phase seems to be tricky !