PM Shehbaz says IMF doesn't trust Pakistan's govt

[Jango]

PTI's only "budget" was so called dividend from Non-Financial holdings of GoP.

Please show a source.

Even FATF doesn't trust Pakistan despite completing all the progress points.

Please enlighten us how you reached this conclusion.

 

[El Observer]

 

[Jango]

(BTW, the title of the thread has been changed in violation of PDF rules, if anyone is still interested in apply the rules fairly. Or not. )

It is literally the headline image of the story from DAWN, and also on their Facebook page.

The thread title (as it is now) was the original title of the DAWN story as well, and only edited later on for the URL. Please see the attached tweet below:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1539943719017000960

Image also attached for reference. Please see the short headline. This is often done by website blog sections so that it helps with the SEO and page rankings.

 

[maithil]

Why will IMF trust this govt headed by money laundering PM ? No one does. He went to all friendly states for begging dollars and all of them rebuffed him.

 

[SBD-3]

Please show a source.



Please enlighten us how you reached this conclusion.

It's in their statement of June .
"FATF made the initial determination that Pakistan has substantially completed its two action plans, covering 34 items, and warrants an on-site visit to verify that the implementation of Pakistan’s AML/CFT reforms has begun and is being sustained, and that the necessary political commitment remains in place to sustain implementation and improvement in the future Link"

It's in their statement of June .
"FATF made the initial determination that Pakistan has substantially completed its two action plans, covering 34 items, and warrants an on-site visit to verify that the implementation of Pakistan’s AML/CFT reforms has begun and is being sustained, and that the necessary political commitment remains in place to sustain implementation and improvement in the future Link"

Shaukat Tareen's "plan" to fund the subsidy
"“The IMF should not worry about it as neither we will take any loan nor increase our fiscal budget to manage the subsidy, but the required money would be managed by diverting dividends from shareholdings in state owned companies (SOEs), cutting development funds from Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), and additional revenues collected during current fiscal year, while some of the funds would be diverted from Ehsaas Programme,” he said while address a press conference here."
Link
Link 2

 

[ghazi52]

,.,.,

 

[shayyman]

These statements are exclusively custom cut out for breed of blind, deaf, and dumb creatures called Patwaris who will take his word like that of a holy book.

 

[waz]

In the UK we say “never trust a Tory”
In Pakistan it’s “never trust a Patwari” @waz @Azadkashmir

Bro minor correction in the UK we say never trust a conservative, Labour or Liberal. They are all in it for themselves.
But yes no one should trust Donkeyleauge.

 

[VCheng]

Image also attached for reference. Please see the short headline. This is often done by website blog sections so that it helps with the SEO and page rankings.

Thank you for the explanation, it is appreciated. However, the link should be changed to be consistent with the rule.

 

[Wood]

Yes, it is very possible that IMF would loose trust in Pakistan because of Imran Khan's fuel subsidy. Shahbaz has merely vocalized what everyone knew already. Some are more willing to admit to this than others

 

[Jango]

Thank you for the explanation, it is appreciated. However, the link should be changed to be consistent with the rule.

So a link which is on the official twitter handle of the newspaper does not represent an actual headline?

 

[SabzShaheen]

Bro minor correction in the UK we say never trust a conservative, Labour or Liberal. They are all in it for themselves.
But yes no one should trust Donkeyleauge.

Looking forward to seeing Labour get punished for taking working-class and Muslim vote for granted. Sadly it will be at the gain of Lib Dems but these Tories have to get the boot. Considering Scotland at this point

 

[VCheng]

So a link which is on the official twitter handle of the newspaper does not represent an actual headline?

If I click on the link quoted:

PM Shehbaz says IMF doesn't trust Pakistan due to PTI govt reneging on agreement

Says agreement with the lender "few days" away but warns that things wouldn't improve overnight even when deal is signed.

www.dawn.com

 

[Shakuni Mama]

Yes, it is very possible that IMF would loose trust in Pakistan because of Imran Khan's fuel subsidy. Shahbaz has merely vocalized what everyone knew already. Some are more willing to admit to this than others

He did slashed it for a reason when he knew that he is going to thrown away.10 Rs that too in a day is a big thing.He did it intentionally to make it difficult for upcoming government. Peer bolte hai bhaisahab yahan peerni bolti hai.

P.S- Don't ban me..It is known in Punjab that people go to peer.

If I click on the link quoted:

PM Shehbaz says IMF doesn't trust Pakistan due to PTI govt reneging on agreement

Says agreement with the lender "few days" away but warns that things wouldn't improve overnight even when deal is signed.

www.dawn.com

View attachment 856206

@Jango must be looking at some other geo link..Kuch sharam hoi hai kuch haya hoti hai @Norwegian .

 

[Jango]

If I click on the link quoted:

PM Shehbaz says IMF doesn't trust Pakistan due to PTI govt reneging on agreement

Says agreement with the lender "few days" away but warns that things wouldn't improve overnight even when deal is signed.

www.dawn.com

View attachment 856206

"The thread title (as it is now) was the original title of the DAWN story as well, and only edited later on for the URL."

Or do you expect moderators to constantly keep an eye out on every thread created until the end of the time, and whenever the original link changes a slight bit we go and alter the thread title?

As it stands, the thread title did not violate any rule, neither was the thread title concocted by the OP himself. It actually was the headline of the DAWN article and the link title and article header and image title at the time the article was published...how is that a violation then?

Trust me, I have no love for Norwegian, ask him how many warning I have given him the past few weeks or whatever, but you are just clutching at straws here and beating a dead horse.