What's new

PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding
Home / Today's Paper / Top Story / PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding
By Ansar Abbasi
October 02, 2016
Print : Top Story
  • 0
  • 0
l_154333_065547_print.jpg



ISLAMABAD: Following the Uri attack, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was asked by the US and the UK to condemn the attack as well as the killing of 18 Indian soldiers but he flatly refused to do so.

Instead, both the influential western capitals were made speechless when countered with the question over the silence of world conscience, including that of London and Washington, with respect to the killing of more than 100 Kashmiris and injuries to thousands more during the recent months in Indian-held Kashmir (IHK) by the Indian forces.

Sources told The News that at the sidelines meetings with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during the recent UN General Assembly session, the Pakistani premier was asked by US Secretary of State John Kerry and UK Prime Minister Theresa May to condemn the Uri attack and the killing of Indian soldiers. The PM, however, refused to do so.

These sources said that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said how Pakistan could do this while India had no regret over its atrocities and brutalities whereas the world, including the influential western capitals, had turned a blind eye to the killing of more than 100 Kashmiris. Pakistan also said that as a result of Indian state terrorism, thousands of Kashmiris had been wounded, including more than 500 who had lost their eyesight because of pellets fired by the Indian forces.

Pakistan categorically rejected the Indian allegations of Islamabad’s involvement in the Uri attack. Pakistan though offered full cooperation to probe the matter as it believed that the Uri attack was either an Indian false flag operation carried out to malign Pakistan and divert the world attention from Kashmir or it was a retaliatory attack by the oppressed Kashmiris, who are facing the worst form of brutalities from the Indian state terrorism.

Pakistan considers the Kashmiris’ struggle for their right to self-determination as legitimate and thus offers moral and diplomatic support to their cause.

The timing of the Uri attack, just two days before Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s address at the UNGA session, had raised many eyebrows and created the suspicion about the possible involvement of India.

Uri is a town in the Baramulla district in the IHK where India through its military had unleashed barbaric and atrocious acts of violence against Kashmiris seeking Azaadi (freedom) from Indian oppression. Only during the recent months, more than 110 Kashmiris had been martyred, over 500 were blinded and thousands were injured but not a single word of regret and remorse had been offered by the Modi government.

Instead of doing what the US and the UK were expecting from it, the PM in his UNGA speech focused on Indian atrocities in IHK. He said, “This indigenous uprising of the Kashmiris has been met, as usual, with brutal repression by India’s occupation force of over half a million soldiers. Over a hundred Kashmiris have been killed, hundreds, including children and infants, have been blinded by shotgun pellets and over six thousand unarmed civilians have been injured over the past two months.”

The PM had added that these Indian brutalities would not suppress the spirit of the Kashmiris; it would only intensify their anger and fortify their determination to see India end its occupation of Kashmir.

“Pakistan fully supports the demand of the Kashmiri people for self-determination, as promised to them by several Security Council resolutions. Their struggle is a legitimate one for liberation from alien occupation,” the premier said.

On behalf of the Kashmiri people, on behalf of the mothers, wives, sisters, and fathers of the innocent Kashmiri children, women and men who have been killed, blinded and injured, on behalf of the Pakistani nation, the prime minister had also demanded an independent inquiry into the extra-judicial killings, and a UN fact-finding mission to investigate the brutalities perpetrated by the Indian occupying forces, so that those guilty of these atrocities might be punished.

“With such a clear stance on Kashmir, expecting from the Pakistani premier to condemn the Uri attack and killing of Indian soldiers is really unfair and irrational,” a source said.
 
.
PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding
Home / Today's Paper / Top Story / PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding
By Ansar Abbasi
October 02, 2016
Print : Top Story
  • 0
  • 0
l_154333_065547_print.jpg



ISLAMABAD: Following the Uri attack, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was asked by the US and the UK to condemn the attack as well as the killing of 18 Indian soldiers but he flatly refused to do so.

Instead, both the influential western capitals were made speechless when countered with the question over the silence of world conscience, including that of London and Washington, with respect to the killing of more than 100 Kashmiris and injuries to thousands more during the recent months in Indian-held Kashmir (IHK) by the Indian forces.

Sources told The News that at the sidelines meetings with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during the recent UN General Assembly session, the Pakistani premier was asked by US Secretary of State John Kerry and UK Prime Minister Theresa May to condemn the Uri attack and the killing of Indian soldiers. The PM, however, refused to do so.

These sources said that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif said how Pakistan could do this while India had no regret over its atrocities and brutalities whereas the world, including the influential western capitals, had turned a blind eye to the killing of more than 100 Kashmiris. Pakistan also said that as a result of Indian state terrorism, thousands of Kashmiris had been wounded, including more than 500 who had lost their eyesight because of pellets fired by the Indian forces.

Pakistan categorically rejected the Indian allegations of Islamabad’s involvement in the Uri attack. Pakistan though offered full cooperation to probe the matter as it believed that the Uri attack was either an Indian false flag operation carried out to malign Pakistan and divert the world attention from Kashmir or it was a retaliatory attack by the oppressed Kashmiris, who are facing the worst form of brutalities from the Indian state terrorism.

Pakistan considers the Kashmiris’ struggle for their right to self-determination as legitimate and thus offers moral and diplomatic support to their cause.

The timing of the Uri attack, just two days before Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s address at the UNGA session, had raised many eyebrows and created the suspicion about the possible involvement of India.

Uri is a town in the Baramulla district in the IHK where India through its military had unleashed barbaric and atrocious acts of violence against Kashmiris seeking Azaadi (freedom) from Indian oppression. Only during the recent months, more than 110 Kashmiris had been martyred, over 500 were blinded and thousands were injured but not a single word of regret and remorse had been offered by the Modi government.

Instead of doing what the US and the UK were expecting from it, the PM in his UNGA speech focused on Indian atrocities in IHK. He said, “This indigenous uprising of the Kashmiris has been met, as usual, with brutal repression by India’s occupation force of over half a million soldiers. Over a hundred Kashmiris have been killed, hundreds, including children and infants, have been blinded by shotgun pellets and over six thousand unarmed civilians have been injured over the past two months.”

The PM had added that these Indian brutalities would not suppress the spirit of the Kashmiris; it would only intensify their anger and fortify their determination to see India end its occupation of Kashmir.

“Pakistan fully supports the demand of the Kashmiri people for self-determination, as promised to them by several Security Council resolutions. Their struggle is a legitimate one for liberation from alien occupation,” the premier said.

On behalf of the Kashmiri people, on behalf of the mothers, wives, sisters, and fathers of the innocent Kashmiri children, women and men who have been killed, blinded and injured, on behalf of the Pakistani nation, the prime minister had also demanded an independent inquiry into the extra-judicial killings, and a UN fact-finding mission to investigate the brutalities perpetrated by the Indian occupying forces, so that those guilty of these atrocities might be punished.

“With such a clear stance on Kashmir, expecting from the Pakistani premier to condemn the Uri attack and killing of Indian soldiers is really unfair and irrational,” a source said.
too many sources as always,without the actual source,now you decide the credibility.
 
. .
I think we already condemned attack , but we didn't take responsibility of attack cause we didn't attack
 
.
Resisting the west which is pro India will be a major feat for Pakistan. It will set up a precedent that we can defy the United States, the same United States which is an evil country which did nothing about India's Smiling Budha nuclear tests while launching sanctions on Pakistans 98 test which was in response. US also supported India's unwarranted aggression in Siachen and demanded our forces to withdraw during Kargil which was in response to Siachen. US now dares to demand an apology from us when India has a history of wrongly blaming Pakistan like it did with Samjhauta.
 
. .
off topic, but can any of you guys answer me on this issue

masood azhar

he is a guy released against release of passengers in a flight hijack- IC814

still Pak needs evidence to nail him ?



now please dont tell, that hijack never happened
its only a story put by India etc
 
.
Why should we condemn the Uri Attack when they kill innocent men, women and children of Kashmir. FREE KASHMIR!
Yes Uri stack was. A retaliation of freedom fighters don't **** up the cause with Indian world stupid mentality

Indians are worst people look what they do to salman Khan who gave sensible reply but those war mingors take him apart this is a highly of their hatred to Islam and muslims
 
.
Resisting the west which is pro India will be a major feat for Pakistan. It will set up a precedent that we can defy the United States, the same United States which is an evil country which did nothing about India's Smiling Budha nuclear tests while launching sanctions on Pakistans 98 test which was in response. US also supported India's unwarranted aggression in Siachen and demanded our forces to withdraw during Kargil which was in response to Siachen. US now dares to demand an apology from us when India has a history of wrongly blaming Pakistan like it did with Samjhauta.

As long as Pakistan has countries like China behind it then resisting the West is possible.

Good on Pakistan for standing up to bullying by US/UK on Kashmir. If India vacated Kashmir then the whole of S Asia would be a much better place.
 
.
off topic, but can any of you guys answer me on this issue

masood azhar

he is a guy released against release of passengers in a flight hijack- IC814

still Pak needs evidence to nail him ?



now please dont tell, that hijack never happened
its only a story put by India etc
Give me evidence of surgical strike because that surely didn't happen.
If it did occur (which it didn't because no evidence has been presented) that means India violated Pakistani Air Space which is seen as an act of war. It would of been the start of a bloody war to free Kashmir. Do you know the difference between a surgical strike and border skirmishes? I think not.
 
Last edited:
.
If he would ... "empire" would kick him out.
Btw that's a mature move by him that he resented his "bf" to make his awaam happy..
 
.
Ok even If I accept they did not happen, as per your convenience.

how do you answer about Masood Azhar bhai?

@Lahore_PAF

@Super Falcon

ok even if Uri was done by kashmiris.
how did they have grenades, ak47, military equipents with them ?

In India you cant buy these things off the shelf like Pakistan illegal gun markets

dont u see Pak envolvement there, in arming the militia ??

salman khan

what have we done to him ?
are u serious ?
we have made him biggest superstar
we are a democracy, where everybody has right to expres, even if they think salman is speaking incorrect.
 
. .
Ok even If I accept they did not happen, as per your convenience.

how do you answer about Masood Azhar bhai?

@Lahore_PAF
I am not that informed about this case but I will tell you my prospective to what I know. To my understanding the aircraft was hijacked and was brought to Lahore; where Pakistani ATC denied the aircraft to land because Pakistan didn't want/have anything to do with the hijacking. When the aircraft started to descend to get in line with Lahore Airport ATC was forced to give clearance for landing. To my understanding no negotiation took place in Pakistan, nor no exchange of passengers for fuel or anything like that. Simply Pakistan gave them fuel to get them out of Pakistani airspace.

The only reason the aircraft landed in Lahore was due to extremely low fuel after the aircraft declared an emergency.

Ok even If I accept they did not happen, as per your convenience.

how do you answer about Masood Azhar bhai?

@Lahore_PAF

@Super Falcon

ok even if Uri was done by kashmiris.
how did they have grenades, ak47, military equipents with them ?

In India you cant buy these things off the shelf like Pakistan illegal gun markets

dont u see Pak envolvement there, in arming the militia ??

salman khan

what have we done to him ?
are u serious ?
we have made him biggest superstar
we are a democracy, where everybody has right to expres, even if they think salman is speaking incorrect.

No, I don't see Pakistani involvement, let me explain:
Kashmir is located between Pakistan and India. And India also has a black market (which includes illegal gun markets). You and me can't smuggle weapons from Azad Kashmir to IOK but the locals and planners must be able to, they know the area off by heart, they know where there are gaps.
Spose Pakistan was involved, what were Indian forces doing? Were they sleeping? Come on... There was a red alert, the Kashmiris want FREEDOM and will not stop at any cost. I'm sorry but Indian forces failed baldy there.
 
.
@Lahore_PAF

bhai u are correct with facts .

Afterwards this flight landed in Afghanistan- kandahar
there terrorists negotiated for the passengers lifes against masood azhar(he was in Indian jail)

this Masood azhar then gets released and goes on to becone leader of Jaish e Mohd

Masood Azhar openly lives in bhawalpur - Pakistan and helps the kashmiri terrorists

Now shouldnt Pak return Masood Azhar, whole world knows he was released in exchange of passengers lifes in IC814 hijack
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom