What's new

PM Narendra Modi to launch India's biggest labour overhaul in decades

Quibbler

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
779
Reaction score
-19
Country
India
Location
India
NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is preparing to launch India's biggest
overhaul of labour laws since independence in a bid to create millions of manufacturing
jobs.

Three officials at the labour ministry told Reuters that the ministry was drafting a bill
for the upcoming parliamentary session that proposes to loosen strict hire-and-fire rules
and make it tougher for workers to form unions.

The changes, if approved by Parliament, will be the biggest economic reform since 1991.
Rajiv Biswas, Asia-Pacific chief economist at IHS Global Insight, said Modi has little option
but to push ahead with the measures.

"Without these reforms, the economy would stagnate, and frustrated investors would look
elsewhere," he said.
"You cannot make political opposition an excuse for not taking tough decisions."
Since taking office in May last year, Modi has taken a series of incremental steps to make
labour laws less onerous for businesses.

BJP governments in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh have taken some steps in this area.
Encouraged by a successful and peaceful implementation of the measures in those states,
the labour ministry now intends to replicate them at the national level, one of the ministry
officials said.

Manish Sabharwal, one of the brains behind Rajasthan's labour reforms and co-founder of
recruitment firm Teamlease, said the Centre would have been better off without attempting
these changes.
"Let states carry out these changes and save your political energy for other policy reforms,"
he said.

EASIER FIRING
As part of the proposed revamp, a factory employing fewer than 300 workers would be
allowed to lay off workers without government permission. Currently, factories employing 100
workers or more need approval for layoffs.
But they will have to pay three times the current severance package, the labour ministry
officials said.
Companies have long been demanding an increase in the ceiling as governments rarely
grant such permissions for layoffs, making it difficult to respond to business downturns and
encouraging them to stay small.

"It will facilitate ease of doing business while ensuring safety, health and social security of
every worker," a senior labour ministry official involved in the deliberations said.
The official said the bill was expected to be finalised in the next three or four weeks, and
would then be sent to cabinet for approval.
The planned changes would also make it tougher for employees to form unions or go on
strike, but would make all employees eligible for minimum wage.
The World Bank says India has one of the most rigid labour markets in the world. That in turn
has been a drag on manufacturing, which accounts for only 16 percent of India's $2 trillion
economy, compared with 32 percent of China's.
Some 84 percent of India's manufacturers employed fewer than 50 workers in 2009,
compared with 25 per cent in China, according to a study published by consultancy firm
McKinsey & Co. last year. Economists cite current labour rules as the biggest constraint on Modi's 'Make in India' ambition.

Just 8 per cent of manufacturing workers in India are in formal employment, the rest are short-term contractors who enjoy minimal social security benefits. It will take deft political management to ensure a speedy passage for the bill. Opposition parties have blocked Modi's land bill in parliament, calling it "anti-farmer". The labour reforms, which are being opposed by labour unions, could also end up being labelled as "pro-corporates".
An official in Modi's office didn't rule out holding off the bill due to short-term political
considerations.
"They may introduce it, but the progress would be very slow," said Kilbinder Dosanjh, a
director at the Eurasia Group consultancy
 
. .
If it goes through, Indian economy growth can beat the estimates by a fair margin. ;)

Three officials at the labour ministry told Reuters that the ministry was drafting a bill
for the upcoming parliamentary session that proposes to loosen strict hire-and-fire rules
and make it tougher for workers to form unions.

Everything else is Jalebi, he's doing this only to help his crony capitalist friend.
 
.
Three officials at the labour ministry told Reuters that the ministry was drafting a bill
for the upcoming parliamentary session that proposes to loosen strict hire-and-fire rules
and make it tougher for workers to form unions.

Everything else is Jalebi, he's doing this only to help his crony capitalist friend.

I support the notion of disbanding any worker's unions, coming from North Bengal, where poor tea garden labors dies of starvation, because it is much profitable for the tea garden owners to shut down their industries to sell their land for real estate, than deal with pesky labor unions.

India tried 60 years of crony socialism, now Indians should try crony capitalism for a decade.
 
.
Three officials at the labour ministry told Reuters that the ministry was drafting a bill
for the upcoming parliamentary session that proposes to loosen strict hire-and-fire rules
and make it tougher for workers to form unions.

Everything else is Jalebi, he's doing this only to help his crony capitalist friend.

I would reccomend you to do a bit of research on indian labour laws .

an extract from wiki to give an idea

Some of India's most controversial labour laws concern the procedures for dismissal contained in the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. A workmen who has been employed for over a year can only be dismissed if permission is sought from and granted by the appropriate government office.[26] Additionally, before dismissal, valid reasons must be given, and there is a wait of at least two months for government permission, before a lawful termination can take effect. ( Extremely rare to get permission - Read Labour law reccomendation by ficci deatilin this) Redundancy pay must be given, set at 15 days' average pay for each complete year of continuous service. An employee who has worked for 4 years in addition to various notices and due process, must be paid a minimum of the employee's wage equivalent to 60 days before retrenchment, if the government grants the employer a permission to lay off.

A permanent worker can be terminated only for proven misconduct or for habitual absence.[27] The Industrial Disputes Act (1947) requires companies employing more than 100 workers to seek government approval before they can fire employees or close down.[5] In practice, permissions for firing employees are seldom granted.[5] Indian laws require a company to get permission for dismissing workers with plant closing, even if it is necessary for economic reasons. The government may grant or deny permission for closing, even if the company is losing money on the operation.[28]

The dismissed worker has a right to appeal, even if the government has granted the dismissal application. Indian labour regulations provide for a number of appeal and adjudicating authorities – conciliation officers, conciliation boards, courts of inquiry, labour courts, industrial tribunals and the national industrial tribunal – under the Industrial Disputes Act.[29] These involve complex procedures. Beyond these labour appeal and adjucating procedures, the case can proceed to respective State High Court or finally the Supreme Court of India.

An awesome example
  • Bharat Forge Co Ltd v Uttam Manohar Nakate [2005] INSC 45, a worker found sleeping for the fourth time in 1983. Bharat Forge initiated disciplinary proceedings under the Industrial Employment Act (1946). After five months of proceedings, the worker was found guilty and dismissed. The worker appealed to the labour court, pleading that his dismissal was unfair under Indian Labour laws. The labour court sided with the worker, directed he be reinstated, with 50% back wages. The case went through several rounds of appeal and up through India's court system. After 22 years, the Supreme Court of India upheld his dismissal in 2005

For people who wish to get a bit deeper i reccomend reading this . http://www.ficci.com/SEdocument/20301/FICCI-NOTE-ON-LABOUR-POLICY-REFORMS.pdf
 
.
I support the notion of disbanding any worker's unions, coming from North Bengal, where poor tea garden labors dies of starvation, because it is much profitable for the tea garden owners to shut down their industries to sell their land for real estate, than deal with pesky labor unions.

India tried 60 years of crony socialism, now Indians should try crony capitalism for a decade.

Oh yeah, then why doesn't modi disband a union called the 'Bharat Mazdoor sangh which happens to be the biggest union in the country? He can do it overnight- it belongs to the BJP. This is selective BS. He'll stoke industrial unrest in places where he wants to and conveniently use it for other purposes elsewhere. And before you give homilies, even 'developed' countries like US and UK have the right to form unions. Modi has not magic wand that he is better than them. Like land acquisition act, this one is also gonna be rigged for big industry and consequently this will also end up in the same kind of mess. Another year lost in his insane and stupid efforts to profiteer for his friends.

And @Skull and Bones , lemme also tell you a new mega wave of Industrial unrest is gonna come in Bengal led by the BJP and BMS. With the commies down on their knees, modi wants to topple mamta. Best way to do it? Bring the state to a grinding halt using his stooge unions. If you're looking for a savior from him, you've got that up the wrong way.
 
.
And @Skull and Bones , lemme also tell you a new mega wave of Industrial unrest is gonna come in Bengal led by the BJP and BMS. With the commies down on their knees, modi wants to topple mamta. Best way to do it? Bring the state to a grinding halt using his stooge unions. If you're looking for a savior from him, you've got that up the wrong way.

Epic fail, there are no industries in Bengal. :lol:

There was Sharada industries, and now Chutiyapanti industries, headed by Shrimati Mamata.
 
.
Epic fail, there are no industries in Bengal. :lol:

There was Sharada industries, and now Chutiyapanti industries, headed by Shrimati Mamata.

Facetious and droll. Who do you think is now going to 'organize' everyone from farmer to worker to the average man on the road to a 'cause for justice'. It's gonna be the BJP. He just did what he's always done, taken a crap piece of legislation and called it something fancy like 'drive manufacturing' and you fell for it. And like I said, absolutely no intention of touching BMS. What he'll do is prevent people from joining any other union while keeping BMS as the only option.
 
.
Facetious and droll. Who do you think is now going to 'organize' everyone from farmer to worker to the average man on the road to a 'cause for justice'. It's gonna be the BJP. He just did what he's always done, taken a crap piece of legislation and called it something fancy like 'drive manufacturing' and you fell for it. And like I said, absolutely no intention of touching BMS. What he'll do is prevent people from joining any other union while keeping BMS as the only option.

So, if they disband BMS, will you support their legislation?
 
. .
NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi is preparing to launch India's biggest
overhaul of labour laws since independence in a bid to create millions of manufacturing
jobs.

Three officials at the labour ministry told Reuters that the ministry was drafting a bill
for the upcoming parliamentary session that proposes to loosen strict hire-and-fire rules
and make it tougher for workers to form unions.

The changes, if approved by Parliament, will be the biggest economic reform since 1991.
Rajiv Biswas, Asia-Pacific chief economist at IHS Global Insight, said Modi has little option
but to push ahead with the measures.

"Without these reforms, the economy would stagnate, and frustrated investors would look
elsewhere," he said.
"You cannot make political opposition an excuse for not taking tough decisions."
Since taking office in May last year, Modi has taken a series of incremental steps to make
labour laws less onerous for businesses.

BJP governments in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh have taken some steps in this area.
Encouraged by a successful and peaceful implementation of the measures in those states,
the labour ministry now intends to replicate them at the national level, one of the ministry
officials said.

Manish Sabharwal, one of the brains behind Rajasthan's labour reforms and co-founder of
recruitment firm Teamlease, said the Centre would have been better off without attempting
these changes.
"Let states carry out these changes and save your political energy for other policy reforms,"
he said.

EASIER FIRING
As part of the proposed revamp, a factory employing fewer than 300 workers would be
allowed to lay off workers without government permission. Currently, factories employing 100
workers or more need approval for layoffs.
But they will have to pay three times the current severance package, the labour ministry
officials said.
Companies have long been demanding an increase in the ceiling as governments rarely
grant such permissions for layoffs, making it difficult to respond to business downturns and
encouraging them to stay small.

"It will facilitate ease of doing business while ensuring safety, health and social security of
every worker," a senior labour ministry official involved in the deliberations said.
The official said the bill was expected to be finalised in the next three or four weeks, and
would then be sent to cabinet for approval.
The planned changes would also make it tougher for employees to form unions or go on
strike, but would make all employees eligible for minimum wage.
The World Bank says India has one of the most rigid labour markets in the world. That in turn
has been a drag on manufacturing, which accounts for only 16 percent of India's $2 trillion
economy, compared with 32 percent of China's.
Some 84 percent of India's manufacturers employed fewer than 50 workers in 2009,
compared with 25 per cent in China, according to a study published by consultancy firm
McKinsey & Co. last year. Economists cite current labour rules as the biggest constraint on Modi's 'Make in India' ambition.

Just 8 per cent of manufacturing workers in India are in formal employment, the rest are short-term contractors who enjoy minimal social security benefits. It will take deft political management to ensure a speedy passage for the bill. Opposition parties have blocked Modi's land bill in parliament, calling it "anti-farmer". The labour reforms, which are being opposed by labour unions, could also end up being labelled as "pro-corporates".
An official in Modi's office didn't rule out holding off the bill due to short-term political
considerations.
"They may introduce it, but the progress would be very slow," said Kilbinder Dosanjh, a
director at the Eurasia Group consultancy

Kindly provide link for source.
 
. .
Oh yeah, then why doesn't modi disband a union called the 'Bharat Mazdoor sangh which happens to be the biggest union in the country? He can do it overnight- it belongs to the BJP. This is selective BS. He'll stoke industrial unrest in places where he wants to and conveniently use it for other purposes elsewhere. And before you give homilies, even 'developed' countries like US and UK have the right to form unions. Modi has not magic wand that he is better than them. Like land acquisition act, this one is also gonna be rigged for big industry and consequently this will also end up in the same kind of mess. Another year lost in his insane and stupid efforts to profiteer for his friends.

And @Skull and Bones , lemme also tell you a new mega wave of Industrial unrest is gonna come in Bengal led by the BJP and BMS. With the commies down on their knees, modi wants to topple mamta. Best way to do it? Bring the state to a grinding halt using his stooge unions. If you're looking for a savior from him, you've got that up the wrong way.
Do you know how he plans to make it tough to form Unions?

Please, allow me to tell you.

It mandates that atleast 30% of the Employees of the firm must agree to join before it is officially accepted as a Union. That means it will limit the number of unions in a factory - because right now, Union politics is causing a lot of trouble. Any 6 people together can form a union - so there are many places with hundreds of unions in one factory!! The unions compete with each other for members by promising outrageous things and then demand them from the factory and strike when not given that.

It doesn't stop you from forming Unions, it prevents facetious and competitive Unionization which does nothing for genuine worker rights and instead does everything to prevent factories from running smoothly and smothers employement.

This kind of thing if left to continue will ensure we are never able to ramp up our manufacturing to global levels.

Please don't oppose good GoI initiatives for the sake of it even if you do oppose the BJP.
 
.
Do you know how he plans to make it tough to form Unions?

Please, allow me to tell you.

It mandates that atleast 30% of the Employees of the firm must agree to join before it is officially accepted as a Union. That means it will limit the number of unions in a factory - because right now, Union politics is causing a lot of trouble. Any 6 people together can form a union - so there are many places with hundreds of unions in one factory!! The unions compete with each other for members by promising outrageous things and then demand them from the factory and strike when not given that.

It doesn't stop you from forming Unions, it prevents facetious and competitive Unionization which does nothing for genuine worker rights and instead does everything to prevent factories from running smoothly and smothers employement.

This kind of thing if left to continue will ensure we are never able to ramp up our manufacturing to global levels.

Please don't oppose good GoI initiatives for the sake of it even if you do oppose the BJP.

Exactly
 
.
ANother Land bill in making. Why not let states decide among themselves. States with improved labour laws will get industries. Others can keep legacy laws.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom