PM Narendra Modi slams Pakistan for waging 'proxy war' against India

[Nitin Goyal]

I never said Pakistan's economy is better than India's, just that both sides depend on international support, to some extent

Cia World Factbook:
Pakistan
Public debt:
54.6% of GDP (2013 est.)

External Debt Pakistan
$52.43 billion (31 December 2013 est.)

India
51.8% of GDP (2013 est.)

note: data cover central government debt, and exclude debt instruments issued (or owned) by government entities other than the treasury; the data include treasury debt held by foreign entities; the data exclude debt issued by subnational entities, as well as intra-governmental debt; intra-governmental debt consists of treasury borrowings from surpluses in the social funds, such as for retirement, medical care, and unemployment; debt instruments for the social funds are not sold at public auctions

External Debt India:
Debt-External
$412.2 billion (31 December 2013 est.)

MUMBAI, JUNE 30:
India’s external debt as of March 31, 2014, showed an increase of $31.2 billion over the year to $440.6 billion, according to the Reserve Bank of India. The increase in total external debt during 2013-14 was primarily on account of the rise in non-resident deposits.

As of March 2014, NRI deposits rose $33 billion to $103.8 billion on the back of the special swap scheme introduced by the RBI for commercial banks during September to November 2013 to mobilise FCNR (B) deposits.

External debt comprises memo items, such as commercial borrowings, NRI deposits, short-term debt as well as multilateral and bilateral debt. The share of government and non-government external debt stood at $81.5 billion ($81.7 billion as of March 2013) and $359.1 billion ($327.8 billion) respectively.

In terms of major components, the share of external commercial borrowings continued to be the highest at 33.3 per cent of total external debt, followed by NRI deposits (23.6 per cent) and short term debt (20.3 per cent).

According to the RBI, the share of short-term debt in the total debt witnessed a decline over the preceding quarter as well as the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Short-term debt at $89.2 billion accounted for 20.3 per cent of the total external debt as of March 2014, as compared to 23.6 per cent as of March 2013. The ratio of short-term debt (original maturity) to foreign exchange reserves declined to 29.3 per cent as of March 2014 from 33.1 per cent as of March 2013.

The valuation gain during 2013-14 amounted to $ 9.4 billion, reflecting the appreciation of the US dollar against the Indian rupee and other major currencies. Thus, excluding the valuation gains, the stock of external debt as of March 2014 would have increased by $40.6 billion instead of $31.2 billion over March 2013.

India's external debt rises to $ 440.6 billion | Business Line

India's foreign exchange reserve is more than 310 billion

 

[Asian.Century]

India itself utilizes this tool of proxy war past 10 years...so it's pot calling the kettle black. coward Modi

 

[Asian.Century]

Ex-Indian Army chief admits sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan.

PM Modi needs to open his eyes first !!!

 

[rockstar08]

Thank you mr Modi .. we were getting so bored because of all political situation in Pakistan ... we thank you from heart for such Comedy
i think he should start a stage show name " Comedy nights with Modi "

 

[Sahasranama]

....

"The whole world will gang up on us" "and take the nukes"
It doesn't work that way dude. It just doesn't.
If India is willing to start a nuclear world war over some stupid delusions, well, God help us.

If pakistan is going to use nuclear blackmail it does not leave the rest of the world with much choice does it ?

I agree that India needs to respond to this proxy war by abrogating the Indus water treaty.

How to react to the cancelling of the Water Treaty is up to pakistan. I suspect, apart from giving empty threats, pakistan can't do much.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

Ex-Indian Army chief admits sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan.

PM Modi needs to open his eyes first !!!

--
is that ultimate proof?
he is in politics now..so now he is POLITICIAN
ganda hai par dhanda hai ye

--
india atleast never did terrorisam attack in pak..
if you so sure why cant you go to uN and ICJ and make india pay for it..
--
if you come with that world image of today of both countir y wil chnage

 

[Sahasranama]

--
is that ultimate proof?
he is in politics now..so now he is POLITICIAN
ganda hai par dhanda hai ye

--
india atleast never did terrorisam attack in pak..
if you so sure why cant you go to uN and ICJ and make india pay for it..
--
if you come with that world image of today of both countir y wil chnage

Its a pakistani source. No Indian source makes this claim. Its just propaganda.

Why go to all this trouble when we can eliminate the threat by a simple act of tearing up the Indus water treaty.

 

[Victory]

Ex-Indian Army chief admits sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan.

PM Modi needs to open his eyes first !!!

TSD was formed just to teach pakistan a lesson for mumbai attacks

Like i said if you will start it, we wont stay behind

 

[pursuit of happiness]

Its a pakistani source. No Indian source makes this claim. Its just propaganda.

Why go to all this trouble when we can eliminate the threat by a simple act of tearing up the Indus water treaty.

--
we can not do it...
we are mature nation...
we dont want anyone right based on international treaty agreed and accepted by both countries..
that why we never did that even in war
Biggest asset of india is being Right despite all odds
somtimes it seen as weakness but long term it pays
---
Indus water ...and pak establishment
we have issue with pak establishment not people.
cuting indus traty hit people hard...
it will give cause to those who want more violence and justification for same...
indus is life line of pak...
think same done by chian for brhamaputra or let say ganga .how will we react ..
--
Finding right aim is more imp than shooting

 

[Sahasranama]

--
we can not do it...
we are mature nation...
we dont want anyone right based on international treaty agreed and accepted by both countries..
that why we never did that even in war
Biggest asset of india is being Right despite all odds
somtimes it seen as weakness but long term it pays
---
Indus water ...and pak establishment
we have issue with pak establishment not people.
cuting indus traty hit people hard...
it will give cause to those who want more violence and justification for same...
indus is life line of pak...
think same done by chian for brhamaputra or let say ganga .how will we react ..
--
Finding right aim is more imp than shooting

1. It is BECAUSE we are a mature nation that we need to abrogate the Indus water treaty.

That is much better than declaring WAR on pakistan.

2. We did not tear up the Indus water treaty earlier because we knew we were stronger than pakistan and we could always end the war in our favour. In those days, War was a much better option than tear up the water treaty. (before Nukes)

3. Our FIRST duty is to protect the "rights" of OUR citizens. ............ protecting the "rights " of pakistani citizens comes a distance second. Get it genius ?

4. pakistani people do not matter in the scheme of things. Not to the Pakistani establishment anyway. For the Indian govt. it is the Indian people who matter. Get it ? And that is the way it should be. We are NOT pakistans "big brother".

5. Lives of Indians are the "lifeline" of India, let us start worrying about saving that "life" & "life line". Spare your tears for pakistani's after you have finished crying for ALL your Dead Indians.

6. China is already damming the Brahmaputra and there is nothing we can do about it. Are we sending TERRORISTS into China ? ..... POOR LOGIC.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

1. It is BECAUSE we are a mature nation that we need to abrogate the Indus water treaty.

That is much better than declaring WAR on pakistan.

2. We did not tear up the Indus water treaty earlier because we knew we were stronger than pakistan and we could always end the war in our favour. In those days, War was a much better option than tear up the water treaty. (before Nukes)

3. Our FIRST duty is to protect the "rights" of OUR citizens. ............ protecting the "rights " of pakistani citizens comes a distance second. Get it genius ?

4. pakistani people do not matter in the scheme of things. Not to the Pakistani establishment anyway. For the Indian govt. it is the Indian people who matter. Get it ? And that is the way it should be. We are NOT pakistans "big brother".

5. Lives of Indians are the "lifeline" of India, let us start worrying about saving that "life" & "life line". Spare your tears for pakistani's after you have finished crying for ALL your Dead Indians.

6. China is already damming the Brahmaputra and there is nothing we can do about it. Are we sending TERRORISTS into China ? ..... POOR LOGIC.

---
1. Mature nation dont act like that..
its for self interest tooo. how anyone then come with international agreement with nation who dont obey it..
see example of maturity ..
Bangladesh wins maritime dispute with India - The Hindu
no one is going for WAR .. atleast not india

2. WAR..
last war was most dangerous wrt to india..
india did not had big economy not diplomatic clout like today nor weapons like today ...no IT/satellite
and pak was assited by USA with their 7th fleet in bay of bengal ..
in all case we cant say we were sure of victory...

3.Citizen
yes.. and its in development of india and people and not war

4.Pak establishemnt and pak people
are 2 diffrent entities
dyanmics of pak is diffrent
like we have some peculiar setting so the pak
pak establsihemnt (not full govt) are against india with few support of public
we have to tackle mischevious guys not others

5. Indian - tears
we are not so weak neither by number nor by character...
better have tear making thing better for india and people..

6. China
shall we send terrorist ? what you think?
will it solve purpose ?
yes china making dam so we made in indus basin..
its run of river not storange in china too...
brahmaputra..also flows in tibet aka china.. they have their right too like we have..
let them go beyond that then we will talk
we dont mind with them till our right are safe
--
if we have right to abrogate indus and stop water so china can do with brahmaputra by same logic
then what we will do..
---
Consclusion...
first dont think from heart ..specialy for pak..have mix of both
india with all weakness have authority and credibility in world because we were and are respobsible
so we got NSG waiveir and nucler deal.. as one of key parameter..

 

[Indrani]

--
we can not do it...
we are mature nation...
we dont want anyone right based on international treaty agreed and accepted by both countries..
that why we never did that even in war
Biggest asset of india is being Right despite all odds
somtimes it seen as weakness but long term it pays
---
Indus water ...and pak establishment
we have issue with pak establishment not people.
cuting indus traty hit people hard...
it will give cause to those who want more violence and justification for same...
indus is life line of pak...
think same done by chian for brhamaputra or let say ganga .how will we react ..
--
Finding right aim is more imp than shooting

No it does not pay. You know Bhisma was proud of the fact that he was Oath bound. His righteousness over his Oath, destroyed his people.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

No it does not pay. You know Bhisma was proud of the fact that he was Oath bound. His righteousness over his Oath, destroyed his people.

--
dear i am weak in Mahabahrat and ramayana...
so cant debate wrt to bhisma
--
time to time priority changes..
that time was
Pran jaye par Vacchan na jayye..
so you can blame bhisma loss of his own men but he kept the OLD tradition alive which was bestowed to them by their predecessors

 

[GURU DUTT]

cant understand your one point, A country that needs to sustain 1.3 billion population in a cramped geography and obviously wants to take it to some good standard of living(cramped in a sense that traditional land/energy connection with resource rich regions are through other countries Pak, China etc though sea energy routes can minimize that thing in future) How can it afford to have that dont care attitude(you are not America sitting across oceans having an amazing pop to resource ratio), if there is a country that needs an ounce of cooperation in the region than its India.

well brother thats the main pakistani frustation and you know why we are good at it .... well cause we have worked hard for it for almost all owr indepentent life (67 years) to achieve it and we dint reach at a stable point(though its still a very very very long way to go .. we are late but not lost) which is not the case with land of the pure

owr hard work and sincearity to make owr lifes better has givin us that confidence not the negetive and revenge full attitude which pakistani quam has exibitted in its last 67 year history

as for dealing with pakistan well the point is pakistan needs us much much more than we do and owr survival is not dependent on pakistans good wishes (rather we want to engage paksiatn so its stops creating more trouble for itself and us so that we can achieve owr goals without much worry of sabotage by pakistan.... in short pakistan onli has just a "neusence value" of a irritating and troublemonger naighbour for most indians) so in short we can carry on at a good pacewithowt trade or relations with pakistan but thats not the case with pakistan and all that is deu to foolish and over zelous policies of pakistani establishment

had pakistan establishment have hadsome sane thinking form day one it would have made good relations withindia and worked hard to develop its educational , medical & industrial infra and worked on getting peacefull trade coridoars from central asia to arabian sea and possibally to india and china and by that it could evry easli had become the most infleuntial nation in asia if not the world ..... but what path did you took and what results you got are just horribally opposite to it and all thats your own fault ...abhi bhi time hai wake up or you will become expendable in very short time .... good luck

baat samajh aa gayee ho to thoko ... thanks

 

[Indrani]

--
dear i am weak in Mahabahrat and ramayana...
so cant debate wrt to bhisma
--
time to time priority changes..
that time was
Pran jaye par Vacchan na jayye..
so you can blame bhisma loss of his own men but he kept the OLD tradition alive which was bestowed to them by their predecessors

He sided with adharma for his Oath so God himself willed his end. Do you want God to will India's end? There will always be conflict between the lesser evil and the greater evil.