What's new

PM Modi recalls 1971 Bangladesh War; names & shames Pakistan amid aggression at LOC

Modi recalls 1971 because none of its "No evidence surgical strikes" or "Balakot Operation" got them a micro-gram of success. Why recall 49 years old incident when had Kargil in 1999 and couple of "no evidence surgical strikes" in 2016 and 2019?

Modi's own hesitation to mention any of their claimed successes prove that their legs tremble and they sweat when speaking about any of them.

"Rafael hotay to result kuch aor hota" :lol:
 
.
And you had Nixon. And China. And SEATO. And CENTO. How did it work out? Dearie..

American papers show Nixon bailed you out. And Nixon tried his best to save what was then East Pakistan. Read the real ones.
And 19 years later it costed soviet union dearly when we broke it and it ran away from Afghanistan with a tail between legs. India lost its main ally and Bharat mata was like a depressed Mistress who lost her sugar daddy.
Why is this Indian trying to look like a cowboy?
Because in 3500 BC lord brahma was worlds first cow boy .
#vediclogic
 
.
Yawn. And you had support of USA. SEATO.CENTO. Now didn't deny that not a single Soviet troop was ever needed to assuage your crestfallen ego. I

Actually we didn't since then we distanced ourselves from those organizations realising that those paper pacts are not worth having round your neck. While India was given real helped by Russians. Get your facts right.
 
.
Actually invading with 12.7× more troops than we had. Also, we were lightly armed in bangladesh. indians and bangladeshis were not.
Security of your East always was in your west it seems
 
.
A lot of water has passed under the bridge since 1971. Any attempt to repeat this scenario won't work. Both of us have changed with time. This time around both of us will go down together. Let's hope that day never comes.
 
.
Hehe, History wont be distorted. Pakistan is exposing them again and again on Rape culture trained by Indian Mukhti bahni and their own troops... Sorry Terrorist Modi, Pakistan will be your demise.
Pakistani troops indeed were responsible for atrocities against women but not all Pakistani troops raped women and the amount of rape which is 200000 is an exaggeration.

Troops of the Baloch and Pathan units were less brutal and did not usually rape bengali women. But the Punjabis were ferocious to the core.

Even in Bangladesh many people in the villages refers the Pakistan army as Punjabi troops because the Punjabis were mostly responsible for all the atrocities against Bengalis.

Having said that Pathans and Balochis were no saints, but they were less brutal and usually did not rape bengali women.
 
.
Pakistani troops indeed were responsible for atrocities against women but not all Pakistani troops raped women and the amount of rape which is 200000 is an exaggeration.

Troops of the Baloch and Pathan units were less brutal and did not usually rape bengali women. But the Punjabis were ferocious to the core.

Even in Bangladesh many people in the villages refers the Pakistan army as Punjabi troops because the Punjabis were mostly responsible for all the atrocities against Bengalis.

Having said that Pathans and Balochis were no saints, but they were less brutal and usually did not rape bengali women.

Ok pajeet
 
.
Pakistani troops indeed were responsible for atrocities against women but not all Pakistani troops raped women and the amount of rape which is 200000 is an exaggeration.

Troops of the Baloch and Pathan units were less brutal and did not usually rape bengali women. But the Punjabis were ferocious to the core.

Even in Bangladesh many people in the villages refers the Pakistan army as Punjabi troops because the Punjabis were mostly responsible for all the atrocities against Bengalis.

Having said that Pathans and Balochis were no saints, but they were less brutal and usually did not rape bengali women.

nice try, you cant change the truth through lies and propaganda.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom