PM Imran Khan’s fiery response to Shehbaz Sharif during joint Parliament session | 6 August 2019

[Hex0maniac]

Where?No sane person wants a war...I am repeating india hasnt done anything which necessiates pakistan to wage a war...you people are just making a mountain out of a mole hill..

What India did is without a doubt a Mutually Assured Destruction path. you have your path to follow and we have ours.

 

[shahbaz baig]

Who is carrying out ethnic cleansing man? Dont be blinded by emotions...no indian will go to kashmir and settle there just because it is made a UT...nobody loves to live in a hostile environment.
This article is repealed to bring prosperity to the valley by allowing outside investments and businesses ( so that militancy can be contained) and also keeping the internal security in view.
We have 28 states without any articles like 370..is there any case of any ethnicity being wiped off by any other community? That doesnt happen.another point to be noted is kashmir is not a place with lots of job opportunities...it doesnt offer much for anyone to go and settle there.
You may not think of what international community think ..but a PM of a country cant think like you especially when his economy is in doldrums and he is going around the world for help ..

Are you really naive?? Warmonger Hindus those hate Muslims from their core heart they are now free to move & invest in Kashmir to further suppress kashmiris.

Now my question is that will Indian Muslims be allowed to migrate in Kashmir ? you will defiantly say that any Indian can migrate and invest in J&K and once again I am gonna say that you are naive. Because your deep state has devil ideology regarding indian minorities especially Muslims. Your deep state has already designed the policy to make sure that no Muslim investors migrate there.

 

[313ghazi]

Regarding one and two, this has been the stated position of Pakistan. Currently India is in denial mode and they will go against it.
Regarding 3 you can say it but are you in a position to follow it through. The answer probably is No. I am sorry to have to say this but you just cannot say something like that on a public forum. This woud be considered state sponsored terrorism and blackmail. The Indians qill just use it as an excuse to divert the attention away from the Kashmir situation. In many ways you will play right into their hands and their current standing means you will lose whatever little support you have internationally.
My own thinking is that for the moment till such time India actually attacks Pakistan itself( and I hate myself for saying this as it is my Muslim brothers that are suffering in Kashmir) we need to keep all of our paws including the ISIones which you have suggested near us. The way to play this is to malign India 9n international Fora and internationally by sending delegations and put joint statements out. Take it to UN AND IF POSSIBLE to international court of Justice. This would give us moral victory and keep our hands clean till such time that India in its desperation attacks Pakistan which we should be preparing for
The struggle of the Kashmiri people needs to remain an insidious struggle in response to occupying forces brhtality and this should be emphasizes on all possible fora. The struggle needs to come from the Kashmiri people. Their blood and sweat is what will gain them victory not the support overt or covert from the outside world.
As mentioned before this is a very painful situation as most Pakistanis feel helpless in front of this naked aggression from India.
A

I disagree with your assesment of part 3. Are we in a place to follow through on it? We've never had overwhelming military force in any of the wars we've fought. We're in a better place than many of the past wars, but again, the promise is what is important right now.

How could anyone consider point 3 blackmail or state sponsored terrorism? How can 1 state telling another to NOT carry out ethnic cleansing or forced widespread demographic change be a negative thing? There is historic precedence for such remarks.

US vs ISIS (Yazidi case), US vs Syria (chemical weapons), Turkey vs Syria (ethnic Turks in Syria) Britain vs Germany (defence pact with Poland) etc etc. People draw red lines all the time in defence of civillian populations.

wrt UN, it's all good and proper but will lead to nothing. Look at Israel vs Palestine. The world knows the Palestinians are being abused, but nobody acts. Who will act against the Indians? Nobody.

If Pakistan considers Kashmir it's territory, then it should consider it's people it's population and support them as such.

 

[Wrath]

The third point is lit

Completely honestly.

I wanted to hear 3 things;

1. That India should revoke the changes it made to the legal status of Kashmir.
2. That India should remove the forces it has occupying Kashmir.
3. That any attempt to ethnically cleanse the Kashmiri population or forcibly change the demographic of Kashmir would lead to military intervention from Pakistan.

I don't want him to go to war, I want him to state point 3 and stand by it.

I also want him to give the ISI the go head to fund proxy wars in India and support Kashmiri freedom fighters with arms, money and training. Of course this part I would like done completely privately and for all I know is already happening, though I suspect not.

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

کشمیر مزمت نہیں
بھارت کی مرمت مانگتا ہے

 

[MastanKhan]

 

[Dubious]

1. That India should revoke the changes it made to the legal status of Kashmir.

We have Lodhi at UNSC

And some Indian took the case to Indian SC

2. That India should remove the forces it has occupying Kashmir.

They have not listened to anyone till date.
.heck they don't even allow UN to come and watch...

3. That any attempt to ethnically cleanse the Kashmiri population or forcibly change the demographic of Kashmir would lead to military intervention from Pakistan

Our army already expressed that..army is with government