What's new

PM Imran Khan to visit Saudi Arab again on May 30

Naah, no need. We're the worst negotiator. At max will get some oil on deferred payments in return.


We joined War of Terror for peanuts and lost around $250b and 80,000 people.

Or May be they don't value our army forces that much? Just consider us like bangladeshi forces? and because they are smart thinking our economy is in bad shape we have to agree whatever they offer.
 
.
you need $$$ to maintain a standing army

I wish kids would play less computer games and read more history books. We're a near bankrupt nation and some people want to play age of empires or command and conquer.
 
.
imran khan going to ksa to secure vote in FATF , if saudi vote this time.
 
. .
"Day ja sakhiya rah e khuda, taira Allah e boota laway ga"
 
.
they do not have a vote smarty pants
ufffffffff haar waqat contradiction ... kabhi khaber poori paar lia karan ..

China is set to secure FATF presidency next year while Saudi Arabia representing the Gulf Cooperation Council is to become a full FATF member. Turkey was the only member that stood by Pakistan despite a strong adverse campaign launched by the US, UK, India and Europe.


"Day ja sakhiya rah e khuda, taira Allah e boota laway ga"
baba ji .......allah khair karsi..
 
.
ufffffffff haar waqat contradiction ... kabhi khaber poori paar lia karan ..

China is set to secure FATF presidency next year while Saudi Arabia representing the Gulf Cooperation Council is to become a full FATF member. Turkey was the only member that stood by Pakistan despite a strong adverse campaign launched by the US, UK, India and Europe.

this wont happen in the next 4 weeks Einstein.
 
.
The Pakistani politicians are a bit slow in the head. The Saudis invited them to Yemen they didn't understand why. Grab some land for yourself mann and release the pressure from your over-growing populations.

Seize some land and try to hold onto via whatever reasons and excuses you can come up with. Your soldiers need training, experience, and trial of weapons. There is minerals in Yemen


a very good idea----------

cant liberate kashmir-------- but

like to grab land of another muslim country---

probably 1 of only real arab country- on which prophet pbuh---- blessed his prayers---


when u follow shaitan ------------ you become one
 
.
Guys, get a flippin life. The country is bankrupt. We don't have any other option than to get help from wherever we can.
 
.
That is the cost of keeping single soldier or private at KSA...Saudis are sucked by these defence billings .... they have no way to go.


05:50 PM ET

One soldier, one year: $850,000 and rising
By Larry Shaughnessy

Keeping one American service member in Afghanistan costs between $850,000 and $1.4 million a year, depending on who you ask. But one matter is clear, that cost is going up.

During a budget hearing today on Capitol Hill, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-North Dakota, asked Department of Defense leaders, "What is the cost per soldier, to maintain a soldier for a year in Afghanistan?" Under Secretary Robert Hale, the Pentagon comptroller, responded "Right now about $850,000 per soldier."

Conrad seemed shocked at the number.

"That kind of takes my breath away, when you tell me it's $850,000," Conrad said

A Pentagon spokesman later said a more accurate figure is $815,000 a year.

Regardless of which number is used Sen. Conrad would be really shocked by the estimate that the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments reached about the same issue.

"The cost per troop in Afghanistan has averaged $1.2 million per troop per year," the center's Todd Harrison wrote in an analysis of last year's Department of Defense budget.

Why the difference? Harrison said the center arrives at its figure by taking "the amount of money spent in Afghanistan for a year and dividing it up by the number of soldiers."

He believes Hale's estimate is lower because the Pentagon removes some costs, like construction, from the Afghanistan spending and divides that lower number by the number of troops.

But one thing is clear, the cost is rising. Hale said the Department of Defense figure was until recently $600,000 a year. And Harrison said the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments' estimate for 2012 is up to $1.4 million.

Harrison said there are two important factors contributing to the increase. There are fewer troops in Afghanistan than in 2011, and the latest Defense budget puts millions into war spending that in previous years were part of the department's base budget.

Hale sees another reason why it's climbing. The major component of the extra costs in Afghanistan are higher operating costs for weapons. When you're in a war you are operating a much higher tempo. "That's a good part that's probably 50% of the budget," he testified.

One thing is clear, the soldier impacts only a small percentage of that cost. A typical army sergeant with four years service makes a base pay of less than $30,000 a year.



Post by: CNN's Larry Shaughnessy
Filed under: AfghanistanDefense SpendingMilitarySecurity Brief

What...850000 for one solier..Man..we can make a battalion with that money..
 
. . .
IK seems to appear more clueless with each passing day. So much for new hope.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom