What's new

PM Imran Khan interview to CNN Farid Zakaria

. . . . .
He should have highlighted India's treatment of Muslims overall not just in Kashmir and in a more eloquent manner, missed opportunity.

He should have asked when was a last time a Muslim in lynched by wild mobs in China with impunity, it's almost a daily occurrence in India. IK should have also played Zakaria's Indian background to tell him that you should know better.
 
.
Dude imagine NS giving this interview with a parchi in his hand 🤣
Besides corruption we forget how big of an embarrassment that 0 personality guy was
View attachment 815293 which parchi to find, which parchi not to find - this is the question..
Ise na he purchi padhty wakt aik mashooor jumla kaha tha

Shair jesa bhaadur janwar bhi

Anday sa nikalta ha :lol:
 
.
Why would someone give an interview the bigot and racists like zakria
He has a large viewership. Get your viewpoint across to as many people as possible. War of narratives. Bombs fell way after.
 
.
What a disgusting piece of yellow journalism. Yanks cut the portion of interview where IK was ripping into India and its RSS ideology.
@That Guy

What happened to mighty free media from western? I thought you brag about how free western media is. So it become selective media? Stop preaching about western value. I hate selective and hypocrite value! :enjoy:
 
.
@That Guy

What happened to mighty free media from western? I thought you brag about how free western media is. So it become selective media? Stop preaching about western value. I hate selective and hypocrite value! :enjoy:
They're free to do whatever they want with the footage. Free media means freedom to take whatever stance you want.

Very different from how china does things. You criticize great leader Winnie the pooh, and you disappear.

You criticize Sleepy Joe, and literally no one cares.

Finally, feel free to reply to my comments, but don't ever tag me again. We're not close enough for you to tag me, and any further attempts to do so will be considered harassment.
 
. . .
That Zakaria is a hateful anti-Pak Indian after all. Our PM took the Indian to task. No doubt about it.


agree zakaria is always hatefull.. however in this interview i didnt see that. He raised issued normally raised by west and didnt really counter any of Imran Khan comments.. some of the stuff was really significant such as calling war on terror a failure... resulting in many more terrorists.
 
.
They're free to do whatever they want with the footage. Free media means freedom to take whatever stance you want.

Very different from how china does things. You criticize great leader Winnie the pooh, and you disappear.

You criticize Sleepy Joe, and literally no one cares.

Finally, feel free to reply to my comments, but don't ever tag me again. We're not close enough for you to tag me, and any further attempts to do so will be considered harassment.
Western free mean free to lie, free to slander, free to manipulate. Thanks for explaining the western free media.

A free and transparent media is never on the agenda of the western. Anybody who really believe free/transparent western media, need to get their head check or they are serving their western master propaganda. :enjoy:

Before you want to accuse me and attack Chinese media. China never promote free media and never claim its free media like some US /western hypocrite who claim their media is free and unbiased but obviously they do as much editing and manipulation to trick reader into what they want you to believe. Presenting the truth is last thing these western media want to do.

A free media scrutinizing it's government. Good.

[Edit] lol, the usual suspects have appeared to attack me once more, and their Pakistani slaves are once again there to defend their honor.
 
.
He stumbled when asked about the Uighurs.
Zakaria's could have asked him about being a champion against islamophobia everywhere except in China. But this interview suited imran well , no pushback.
And suited India well too.
The more he defends the Taliban, the more he plays into our hands.
He obviously has no idea about entrenched attitudes. A ordinary American sees a man defending the Taliban, their attitudes harden.
And his saying that the Taliban are in charge so work with them, is a very weak argument.
A smart interviewer could ask him to do the same in India's case.
A intelligent leader totally skirts contentious issues when speaking to the public. It's not a debating contest.
And blaming the Americans for the drone attacks , is counter productive. They relate them to 9-11.
About India he assumes that others don't have access to the country. Obvious propaganda never flys.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom