What's new

PM Imran Khan addresses to nation about new map of Pakistan

You are thinking of Modi here. Like he sealed his lips ever since Galwan defeat, he has kept his mouth firmly shut.
He has not uttered China's name once.

Pakistan on the other hand gave China its claimed territory other side of Mount Goodwin.

Why it has left it open because the issue of Ladakh should be negotiated once Kashmir is liberated. It would go according to the claims and historical data.

And according to the plebiscite. The plebiscite is the entire essence and basis of that agreement.
 
.
Why is Pakistan not asking for the rest of Punjab?

Werent muslim majority states supposed to join Pakistan- in that case India/Brits screwed Pakistan by partitioning punjab/bengal when combined they were both muslim majority and should have gone to Pakistan....
 
.
And according to the plebiscite. The plebiscite is the entire essence and basis of that agreement.

I wish. I don't think India would ever agree to it.
Pakistan made a terrible mistake that it accepted bilateral agreement to settle Kashmir.
It should have never accepted it at later stages. That was Indian's dirty scheme. Our retarded politicians and bureaucrats fall for it, or due to their corruption, either way, bad decision.

Pakistan should have not accepted the ceasefire when Nahro went running to the UN.
Same way it did at the time of Kargil. BS Indians tells about Kargil is what it is BS.
 
. . .
Lol... this open ended map seems like a joke.

Pakistani government seems confused, there confusion stems from, not wanting to anger the Chinese, by claiming an area Jammu and Kashmir which either China is claiming now or might claim in future...such that they could not even include eastern boundary of erst while state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Just shows how much Pakistani care about Kashmirs, that they would happily give away a part of their state to China as long as Pakistan also get some.

Its like.. bhaad mein jayein Kashmiri and their land..China ke sath mil baant ke khanyenge Kashmir ko.

Indeed a very much confusion.... yesterday they changed highway name to Srinagar highway and feel putting signboards on highway showing Srinagar 300 kms will actually allow them to drive their cars there to Srinagar... Now they have changed the map.... wow Imran has shown what couldn't be achieved by all Pak leaderships in last 70 years he has easily done it by changing highway names and country maps....
 
. .
Lol... this open ended map seems like a joke.

Pakistani government seems confused, there confusion stems from, not wanting to anger the Chinese, by claiming an area Jammu and Kashmir which either China is claiming now or might claim in future...such that they could not even include eastern boundary of erst while state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Just shows how much Pakistani care about Kashmirs, that they would happily give away a part of their state to China as long as Pakistan also get some.

Its like.. bhaad mein jayein Kashmiri and their land..China ke sath mil baant ke khanyenge Kashmir ko.


This has been explained by FM Quershi, if you bothered listening to his presentation. @7:25
 
. .
Is a plebescite with 1947 religio-ethno demographics possible today?
Yes - despite all the talk about the exodus of Hindu Pandits, the biggest (negative) demographic impact was in fact on the Muslims. The Mahrajah, his forces and associated groups murdered around 200,000 Muslims in 1947, with hundreds of thousands more forced to leave.

Estimate the demographic impact of that exodus and genocide of Muslims by looking at Muslim birth rates and the increase in the Muslim population had those people not been massacred and forced to leave. The Pandit exodus doesn't even come close.
 
. . . .
Just shows how much Pakistani care about Kashmirs, that they would happily give away a part of their state to China as long as Pakistan also get some.

Its like.. bhaad mein jayein Kashmiri and their land..China ke sath mil baant ke khanyenge Kashmir ko.
No, it shows that Pakistan wants to engage in talks with China after the dispute is resolved in accordance with UNSC Resolutions (assuming the plebiscite goes in Pakistan's favor) and negotiate the final border.

Please refrain from putting your bhakt spin on something so patently obvious.
 
.
Yes - despite all the talk about the exodus of Hindu Pandits, the biggest (negative) demographic impact was in fact on the Muslims. The Mahrajah, his forces and associated groups murdered around 200,000 Muslims in 1947, with hundreds of thousands more forced to leave.

Estimate the demographic impact of that exodus and genocide of Muslims by looking at Muslim birth rates and the increase in the Muslim population had those people not been massacred and forced to leave. The Pandit exodus doesn't even come close.

Is the above highlighted a verifiable objective truth?

Also, even if we were to assume it is, the number of Hindus expelled from the Kashmir Valley is about 500k (Estimates vary from 300k - 700k, but everyone agrees it's at least 300k).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-36525694

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_20

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/cont...rt00001;jsessionid=1vpe8w17ibkn0.x-ic-live-02

Is the difference in birth rates significantly different between Muslims and Hindus who speak the same language, have the same ethnicity, have the same cultural values and the only difference is the religion?

Because in UP and Bihar (One of the less developed states like Kashmir) in India the birth rates of Hindus and Muslims seem to be comparable.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom