PLA Navy Carrier/Fighters..

[Always Neutral]

China has no habit to publicize its defense procurements, so don't expect any news link. Believe or not, as your wish.

Dear MX,

It will be to hard even for the Chinese Govt. to conceal the building of a AC. The reason i asked you the LOA was because if you are right then the drydock or slipway must be big enough to accomodate it.

Regards

 

[mxiong]

Good for China. Any details on the LOA etc ?

Regards

People believe it will be a medium-sized (50k~60K tons), conventional-powered AC w/ steam catapults.

 

[Always Neutral]

People believe it will be a medium-sized (50k~60K tons), conventional-powered AC w/ steam catapults.

I wonder where China will get its steam catapault tech from ?

Regards

 

[mxiong]

I wonder where China will get its steam catapault tech from ?

Regards

French+indigenous.

 

[Always Neutral]

French+indigenous.

If I am not mistaken even the French get it from the US.

Aircraft catapult - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regards

 

[Myth_buster_1]

From you or Dr Carlo Kopp?

if you know they are not my words then why are you trying to be a smart @ss making a sarcastic remark?
i posted the link in my previous post..

 

[ARSENAL6]

Dear MX,

It will be to hard even for the Chinese Govt. to conceal the building of a AC. The reason i asked you the LOA was because if you are right then the drydock or slipway must be big enough to accomodate it.

Regards

Hard to conceal ?

Y'know there are canopies and structure to hide large vessles

 

[Jliu]

if you know they are not my words then why are you trying to be a smart @ss making a sarcastic remark?
i posted the link in my previous post..

Oh dear...I see you have copy/pasted straight from the earliest post. In other reputable defence forums that I know of you can by kicked out for attempting that kind of stunt.

Now if you refer to your post #18, all those are 'speculations' from a known "Blue Team" hyping the China Threat. Now I quite appreciate their work as it gives us ammunition to get better funding and hardware from the politicians but for the purpose of analysis and debate it is a total load of rubbish.

 

[Jliu]

As if these nay-sayers knew what they were talking about...they are from neither University of National Defense nor Academy of Military Science, and they don't know half of PLA's anti-access arsenal in West Pacific.

"Anti Access Arsenal?"

Don't make me laugh. The USN+allies can penetrate the PLAN's "first island chain" any time we want anytime including parking subsurface assets outside your naval bases. Even the Pakistanis have done it given the level of PLAN ASW competancy.

Case Study-Hainan Island Nov 2007

On another note, when posting in WAB, I see you have been kicked out for posting rubbish as usual.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Oh dear...I see you have copy/pasted straight from the earliest post. In other reputable defence forums that I know of you can by kicked out for attempting that kind of stunt.

Now if you refer to your post #18, all those are 'speculations' from a known "Blue Team" hyping the China Threat. Now I quite appreciate their work as it gives us ammunition to get better funding and hardware from the politicians but for the purpose of analysis and debate it is a total load of rubbish.

the Chinese have done it before and will do it again, J-11 will be upgraded to Su-33 and possibly PN may be the first customer!

 

[gpit]

"Anti Access Arsenal?"

...

I believe XM is referring to the following:

Washington Times - Admiral pursues Chinese answers, ties

...

"We are concerned about development of long-range cruise and ballistic missiles. We're concerned about anti-satellite technology, execution thereof. We're concerned about area-denial weapons," Adm. Timothy Keating told reporters.

...

Area-denial arms are what the Pentagon calls weapons used to attack U.S. aircraft carriers and ships. They include ballistic and cruise missiles with precision-guided warheads for strikes against carriers and other warships that would defend Taiwan in any conflict, the Pentagon has said.
...

-------

Area denial arms are there. As to the capability and effectiveness, nobody knows until tested in real conflicts, which I'm sure will be bad enough for everyone...

 

[mxiong]

"Anti Access Arsenal?"

Don't make me laugh. The USN+allies can penetrate the PLAN's "first island chain" any time we want anytime including parking subsurface assets outside your naval bases. Even the Pakistanis have done it given the level of PLAN ASW competancy.

Case Study-Hainan Island Nov 2007

On another note, when posting in WAB, I see you have been kicked out for posting rubbish as usual.

Just curious, has US offered Australia nuclear umbrella which makes you so horny to bump your chest?

 

[Always Neutral]

Just curious, has US offered Australia nuclear umbrella which makes you so horny to bump your chest?

Why are you planning to Nuke Australia ?

Regards

 

[Always Neutral]

China develops flying aircraft carrier | The Register

China develops flying aircraft carrier

 

[mxiong]

Why are you planning to Nuke Australia ?

Regards

What's there to nuke except kangaroos? Nah, just remind him that Aussies are in no position to look down upon PLA, especially Chinese Aussies.