What's new

PK 45; Abbottabad voters to choose between ‘change’ and ‘dynasty’

Meray bhai main aap se 35 puncture wali us conversation ke baat kar raha hoon jo Imran nay media se promise ke the....woh conversation kahan hay....koe proof to lee aao...media main he le aao.....but woh proof to le kar aao kahin se?


Nanhay munnay bubblu bubblu bachay hain....abhi baray hongay to sanskari ho jain gay.... :)


jab full gear mayn ho gi pmln ki qurbani ki tehreeq tab pcb kay future chairman to be ki conversation b aa jaey gi

shaid us say pehlay b agar Sethi ko jaldi suna hay tu supreme court mayn chala jaey wahan b suna dayn gay burden is on pti
 
jab full gear mayn ho gi pmln ki qurbani ki tehreeq tab pcb kay future chairman to be ki conversation b aa jaey gi

shaid us say pehlay b agar Sethi ko jaldi suna hay tu supreme court mayn chala jaey wahan b suna dayn gay burden is on pti
Bhai main nay aapsay koe quantum physics ka sawal nahi pocha....Ek line ka jawab likhnay main kaya ja raha hay....
 
Bhai main nay aapsay koe quantum physics ka sawal nahi pocha....Ek line ka jawab likhnay main kaya ja raha hay....


jis ka jawab mayn nay day dia jis pay ilzam hay wo courts mayn nae gaya pata hayn kay ganda ho jae ga (aur b ziada) aur tujay masla para hay
 
jis ka jawab mayn nay day dia jis pay ilzam hay wo courts mayn nae gaya aur tujay masla para hay
Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....
 
It means
1-Ya to Imran ko pata tha key yeh sab jhut hay
2- Ya phir ghairat par parliament ke membership ghalib aagye...
bro im not asking about imran ..im asking what u think???? bro that means that all the pml n members who took oath in musharraf time know the Musharraf won fair and clear??? he was a legitimate president??? are u saying that

recently i have noticed that u never said a word against pml n .. even when u condem u say it with if and buts .. im asking what u think and u r trying to come upwith ajeeb o gareeb logic .. u are syaing imran should have iggitated and protested and burned down things instead of coming to parliament??
 
PML-N has won by a good margin. In the end it was not a close race. 28,187 votes for PML-N vs. 21,385 for PTI.

IK needs to take another look at his political stances. Apparently it is not working as well as it was hoped.

In the long term, we should vote against dynasty. But voters in that constituency have other concerns.

Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....
Reprehensible language brother. I've given negative rating on this in the past. I hope you understand. I hope for better from you. People my age remember Tahira Syed quite well.
 
bro im not asking about imran ..im asking what u think???? bro that means that all the pml n members who took oath in musharraf time know the Musharraf won fair and clear??? he was a legitimate president??? are u saying that

recently i have noticed that u never said a word against pml n .. even when u condem u say it with if and buts .. im asking what u think and u r trying to come upwith ajeeb o gareeb logic .. u are syaing imran should have iggitated and protested and burned down things instead of coming to parliament??
I gave you two plausible explanations...which one would you take out of them, I leave it to you....
I never say anything about anyone unless provoked to extreme extent...
 
I gave you two plausible explanations...which one would you take out of them, I leave it to you....
I never say anything about anyone unless provoked to extreme extent...
i didnt see any answer .. but anyways leave it hee
 
Reprehensible language brother. I've given negative rating on this in the past. I hope you understand. I hope for better from you. People my age remember Tahira Syed quite well.
I just turned his argument on himself....Its not a comment but a question.....

i didnt see any answer .. but anyways leave it hee
Both are the answers, choose which one suits you..
 
Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....


idhar tu proof aya howa hay 35 puncture ka tab hi stay liay hayn pmln nay

hum tu courts mayn hayn aur patwari stay pay

halankay jawad s khawaja jesay nokar Iftikhar ch chor kar b gaya hay phir b pmln walay dartay hayn

5 saal stay pay patwari hakomat ko stay nae karnay dayn gay
 
Last edited:
idhar tu proof aya howa hay 35 puncture ka tab hi stay liay hayn pmln nay

hum tu courts mayn hayn aur patwari stay pay

halankay jawad s khawaja jesay nokar Iftikhar ch chor kar b gaya hay phir b pmln walay dartay hayn

5 saal stay pay patwari hakomat ko stay nae karnay dayn gay
That's what I am asking....where is that proof?....Why doesn't PTI present that proof in the media if she doesn't trust courts etc....
At one time you're saying that its the responsibility of accused to prove it wrong and at the same time contradicting with your earlier stance by saying that the proof exists......
 
That's what I am asking....where is that proof?....Why doesn't PTI present that proof in the media if she doesn't trust courts etc....
At one time you're saying that its the responsibility of accused to prove it wrong and at the same time contradicting with your earlier stance by saying that the proof exists......


proof exists in the form of white paper,videos,bogus votes etc etc presented in courts,tribunals and EC that is why recount or thumb verification was ordered as i told you earlier

but like a deeth patwari you keep on insisting .that is not curable
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom