Jzaib
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 16, 2013
- Messages
- 6,574
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
so is that a yes or no??Well if he had rigged the elections, then morally IK shouldn't have been taking oath from the very person....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so is that a yes or no??Well if he had rigged the elections, then morally IK shouldn't have been taking oath from the very person....
Meray bhai main aap se 35 puncture wali us conversation ke baat kar raha hoon jo Imran nay media se promise ke the....woh conversation kahan hay....koe proof to lee aao...media main he le aao.....but woh proof to le kar aao kahin se?
Nanhay munnay bubblu bubblu bachay hain....abhi baray hongay to sanskari ho jain gay....
It meansso is that a yes or no??
Thanks once againCongratulations once again then.
Bhai main nay aapsay koe quantum physics ka sawal nahi pocha....Ek line ka jawab likhnay main kaya ja raha hay....jab full gear mayn ho gi pmln ki qurbani ki tehreeq tab pcb kay future chairman to be ki conversation b aa jaey gi
shaid us say pehlay b agar Sethi ko jaldi suna hay tu supreme court mayn chala jaey wahan b suna dayn gay burden is on pti
Bhai main nay aapsay koe quantum physics ka sawal nahi pocha....Ek line ka jawab likhnay main kaya ja raha hay....
Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....jis ka jawab mayn nay day dia jis pay ilzam hay wo courts mayn nae gaya aur tujay masla para hay
bro im not asking about imran ..im asking what u think???? bro that means that all the pml n members who took oath in musharraf time know the Musharraf won fair and clear??? he was a legitimate president??? are u saying thatIt means
1-Ya to Imran ko pata tha key yeh sab jhut hay
2- Ya phir ghairat par parliament ke membership ghalib aagye...
Reprehensible language brother. I've given negative rating on this in the past. I hope you understand. I hope for better from you. People my age remember Tahira Syed quite well.Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....
I gave you two plausible explanations...which one would you take out of them, I leave it to you....bro im not asking about imran ..im asking what u think???? bro that means that all the pml n members who took oath in musharraf time know the Musharraf won fair and clear??? he was a legitimate president??? are u saying that
recently i have noticed that u never said a word against pml n .. even when u condem u say it with if and buts .. im asking what u think and u r trying to come upwith ajeeb o gareeb logic .. u are syaing imran should have iggitated and protested and burned down things instead of coming to parliament??
i didnt see any answer .. but anyways leave it heeI gave you two plausible explanations...which one would you take out of them, I leave it to you....
I never say anything about anyone unless provoked to extreme extent...
I just turned his argument on himself....Its not a comment but a question.....Reprehensible language brother. I've given negative rating on this in the past. I hope you understand. I hope for better from you. People my age remember Tahira Syed quite well.
Both are the answers, choose which one suits you..i didnt see any answer .. but anyways leave it hee
Yani phir Imran par zani honay ka ilzam laganay walay bhee sahi huay....
That's what I am asking....where is that proof?....Why doesn't PTI present that proof in the media if she doesn't trust courts etc....idhar tu proof aya howa hay 35 puncture ka tab hi stay liay hayn pmln nay
hum tu courts mayn hayn aur patwari stay pay
halankay jawad s khawaja jesay nokar Iftikhar ch chor kar b gaya hay phir b pmln walay dartay hayn
5 saal stay pay patwari hakomat ko stay nae karnay dayn gay
That's what I am asking....where is that proof?....Why doesn't PTI present that proof in the media if she doesn't trust courts etc....
At one time you're saying that its the responsibility of accused to prove it wrong and at the same time contradicting with your earlier stance by saying that the proof exists......